By steady-state+zero-sum I mean that the amount of rainfall over the
entire globe is very much a constant (slight increases due to global
warming) coupled with a zero-sum distribution over the globe.

An example is better than a definition.

If we take a large enough section of the globe, say continental USA
then the rainfall in any given state is well defined by the plants that
live there and have lived there for the past 2,000 years. The tip of
southeast South Dakota has on average about 50 cm (20 inches) of
rainfall a year whereas the east coast has about 100 cm (40 inches) of
rainfall per year. This year the East coast was flooded by rain which
means the Midwest must suffer a drought. What extra rainfall the East
Coast gets is taken away from the rainfall that the Midwest was meant
to receive. This is a combination of steady-state with zero-sum.

Due to Global Warming the amount of rainfall over the entire world is
gradually increasing which is good news, but bad news considering that
the distribution of that total rainfall is now concentrated on the
coasts of continents. Global Warming has the nasty effect of drying out
the interiors of continents. So the Midwest of the USA, if nothing is
done will become arid and desert-like. What used to be farmland of corn
and beans will have to become arid farmland of crops that can take
summers without any rainfall. Perhaps sugar beets replacing corn.

The overall effect of Global Warming is that the the interior of
continents become deserts and too much water is yearly dumped on the
coasts of continents either in the form of hurricanes or monsoon type
weather. Periodic flooding of coasts and interiors turning into
deserts.

There is a solution. An easy solution. We put thistle seeds into the
cargo hull of all airplanes who are thus required to emit those seed in
the apogee of their flightpath. In other words we imitate or mimic the
Pinatuba volcano of 1991. The summer of the year 1992 was the coolest
in living memory. It was a fantastic summer. But also, it was the best
year for the rainfall of the Midwest. It is called the Midwest Flood of
1993.

The sulfur molecules of Pinatuba acted as a cloud seeding and
eventually yielded the rainfall for 1992 and 1993.

Now I do not want the Thistle Seed to create a Midwest Flood. But I do
expect the Thistle Seed to bring more rain to the interior of
continents. Thistle seed does not seed clouds as does volcanic sulfur
molecules.

So I expect the Thistle Seed released by airplanes in the apogee of
their flight to create Cool summers and in addition to bring more
rainfall to the interior of continents.

If we do nothing in the future as we have done nothing so far about the
problem of Global Warming, what will happen is the USA heartland will
become a desert unable to support agriculture. We have had no rain for
2 months here in South Dakota where I live. Almost the entire summer
has been without rain. The reason, as I see it, is because Global
Warming dumped what rain was meant for the MidWest onto states like
Pennsylvania and the East Coast earlier this year. In past history,
that rainfall was designed to fall on the Midwest, but due to Global
Warming, rain has a hard time of falling on the Midwest and is dumped
onto the coasts instead.

The solution is Thistle Seed or some material like thistle seed and for
all airplane flights to emit the seed in the apogee of their
flightpath. The result is cooler summers and the retention of the
rainfall patterns that have been in place for at least 2,000 years now.

If we do nothing, as we have done nothing except make Global Warming
worse, then we end up with destroying the climates of the interior of
continents and dumping yearly rainfall on the coasts of continents.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

wrote:


So I expect the Thistle Seed released by airplanes in the apogee of
their flight to create Cool summers and in addition to bring more
rainfall to the interior of continents.


I do not know where to begin to check to see if thistle seed would have
any of the properties as a nucleating agent in cloud seeding to yield
rain such as silver iodide.

Most of a thistle-seed is just carbon and hydrogen atoms. But it has
one advantage over silver iodide in that the volume and density is in
the favor of thistle-seed. So it may act as a rainfall maker when
distributed into clouds. Here is a opportunity to thus relieve
droughts. In drought areas we shift more of the airplanes into the
drought and release the thistle-seed.

Now I am checking on reflectivity of thistle-seed. I wish I could check
its performance against that of the Pinatuba volcano sulfur emissions
which caused a cool summer of 1992 and 1993 and ample rainfall on
continents. Chemists and material-scientists will have to make the
science comparisons. I can compare the reflectivity of thistle-seed to
that of cotton fiber or paper fiber. I can compare reflectivity of
thistle-seed to that of Cottonwood-tree-seed.


Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Now I called the entire Earth rainmaking a steady-state and also a
zero-sum. So what do I mean by those 2 concepts joined together?

I mean that all the rainfall over the entire globe in a year is like a
machine that has a capacity to deliver only a specific amount of
rainfall. Think of a bucket which has a maximum capacity. So if I fill
the bucket with water that is the maximum.

In the same manner, global rainfall is like a machine with a maximum
capacity. The climates over the globe attest to the maximum capacity.
Our globe as a rain producer can only deliver so much water in the form
of rain in a given year. It is dependent on the Sunlight which
determines this maximum capacity. It is a machine and recycling machine
at that.

So by Steady-State, I mean that the rainfall per year on this planet is
determined like a machine of a maximum capacity and these patterns and
cycles of rainfall have created climates over all of Earth's surface
that although changing are only gradually changing.

And although the Globe is warming due to greenhouse gases, the amount
of yearly rainfall is not increasing.

Now when we include Zero-Sum to that of Steady-State, we have the
present alarming weather crisis around the world. That when the
East-coast of the USA such as Pennsylvania receive a double amount of
rainfall than normal, means that some other region of the globe
experiences horrible drought. So that if Pennsylvania gets twice as
much rain in 2006, means states like South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado
get 1/2 as much yearly rain as they should.

By Steady-State and Zero-Sum, I simply mean that the weather and
climate over the planet Earth is like a machine which is fueled by the
Sun's energy. And thus there are maximum limits as to how much rainfall
the land surface of Earth can receive in any given year. Because the
land can have only a specific amount-- the maximum -- means that if one
region gets twice as much as what its climate of the past then another
region gets only 1/2 as much as its climate of the past.

What Global Warming is doing is destroying the old patterns of weather
and climate. Global Warming is causing more rainfall to occur around
coastal areas and making the interior of continents into desert
climates. Due mostly for the fact that hotter oceans force rainfall to
be concentrated on coasts by hurricanes or by monsoons.

Global Warming destroys the weather and climate machine to deliver
fresh water, rainfall to be more evenly distributed.

Global Cooling would more evenly distribute rainfall. Global Warming
has the tendency to unevenly distribute rainfall.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

wrote:
By steady-state+zero-sum I mean that the amount of rainfall over the
entire globe is very much a constant (slight increases due to global
warming) coupled with a zero-sum distribution over the globe.

Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty has received
$160,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Africa Fighting Malaria has received $30,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
American Council for Capital Formation Center for Policy Research
has received $1,309,523 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
American Council on Science and Health has received $110,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research has
received $1,625,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
American Enterprise Institute-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory
Studies has received $105,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
American Friends of the Institute for Economic Affairs has received
$50,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
American Legislative Exchange Council has received $1,189,700 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
American Spectator Foundation has received $15,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Arizona State University Office of Cimatology has received $49,500
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Aspen Institute has received $61,500 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Atlantic Legal Foundation has received $20,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Atlas Economic Research Foundation has received $680,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Capital Research Center and Greenwatch has received $190,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Cato Institute has received $90,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Center for American and International Law has received $177,450 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Center for Strategic and International Studies has received
$1,112,500 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise has received $230,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Center for the New West has received $5,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change has
received $90,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Centre for the New Europe has received $170,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Chemical Education Foundation has received $80,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Citizens for A Sound Economy and CSE Educational Foundation has
received $380,250 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow has received $472,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Communications Institute has received $125,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Competitive Enterprise Institute has received $2,005,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Congress of Racial Equality has received $250,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Consumer Alert has received $70,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies has received
$75,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment has
received $210,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Fraser Institute has received $120,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Free Enterprise Action Institute has received $50,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Free Enterprise Education Institute has received $80,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Frontiers of Freedom Institute and Foundation has received $857,000
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
George C. Marshall Institute has received $630,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
George Mason University, Law and Economics Center has received
$185,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Harvard Center for Risk Analysis has received $30,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Heartland Institute has received $561,500 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Heritage Foundation has received $555,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, Stanford University
has received $295,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Hudson Institute has received $25,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Independent Institute has received $70,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Institute for Energy Research has received $147,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Institute for Regulatory Science, 9200 Rumsey Road, Suite 205
Columbia, MD 21045 USA
Institute for Senior Studies has received $30,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Institute for the Study of Earth and Man has received $76,500 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
International affiliate of the American Council for Capital
Formation.
International Policy Network - North America has received $295,000
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
International Republican Institute has received $105,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
James Madison Institute has received $5,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Landmark Legal Foundation has received $30,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Lexington Institute has received $10,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Lindenwood University has received $10,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Mackinac Center has received $30,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research has received $175,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Media Institute has received $60,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Media Research Center has received $150,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Mercatus Center, George Mason University has received $80,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Mountain States Legal Foundation has received $2,500 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
National Association of Neighborhoods has received $75,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
National Black Chamber of Commerce has received $150,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
National Center for Policy Analysis has received $390,900 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
National Center for Public Policy Research has received $280,000
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
National Environmental Policy Institute has received $75,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
National Legal Center for the Public Interest has received $215,500
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
National Wilderness Institute has received $10,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
New England Legal Foundation has received $7,500 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Pacific Legal Foundation has received $110,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy has received $370,000
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Property and Environment Research Center, Political Economy Research
Center has received $115,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Reason Foundation has received $381,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Science and Environmental Policy Project has received $20,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Stanford University GCEP has received $100,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Tech Central Science Foundation or Tech Central Station has received
$95,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Texas Public Policy Foundation has received $15,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
The Advancement of Sound Science Center, Inc. has received $40,000
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
The Annapolis Center for Science-Based Public Policy has received
$688,575 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
The Justice Foundation (formerly Texas Justice Foundation) has
received $10,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Washington Legal Foundation has received $185,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public Policy has
received $120,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.

Prosecute Richard SCAIFE for Global Warming Coral Bleaching Damages
wrote:
wrote:
By steady-state+zero-sum I mean that the amount of rainfall over the
entire globe is very much a constant (slight increases due to global
warming) coupled with a zero-sum distribution over the globe.

Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty has received
$160,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Africa Fighting Malaria has received $30,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
American Council for Capital Formation Center for Policy Research
has received $1,309,523 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
American Council on Science and Health has received $110,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research has
received $1,625,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
American Enterprise Institute-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory
Studies has received $105,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
American Friends of the Institute for Economic Affairs has received
$50,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
American Legislative Exchange Council has received $1,189,700 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
American Spectator Foundation has received $15,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Arizona State University Office of Cimatology has received $49,500
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Aspen Institute has received $61,500 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Atlantic Legal Foundation has received $20,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Atlas Economic Research Foundation has received $680,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Capital Research Center and Greenwatch has received $190,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Cato Institute has received $90,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Center for American and International Law has received $177,450 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Center for Strategic and International Studies has received
$1,112,500 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise has received $230,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Center for the New West has received $5,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change has
received $90,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Centre for the New Europe has received $170,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Chemical Education Foundation has received $80,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Citizens for A Sound Economy and CSE Educational Foundation has
received $380,250 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow has received $472,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Communications Institute has received $125,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Competitive Enterprise Institute has received $2,005,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Congress of Racial Equality has received $250,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Consumer Alert has received $70,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies has received
$75,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment has
received $210,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Fraser Institute has received $120,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Free Enterprise Action Institute has received $50,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Free Enterprise Education Institute has received $80,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Frontiers of Freedom Institute and Foundation has received $857,000
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
George C. Marshall Institute has received $630,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
George Mason University, Law and Economics Center has received
$185,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Harvard Center for Risk Analysis has received $30,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Heartland Institute has received $561,500 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Heritage Foundation has received $555,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, Stanford University
has received $295,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Hudson Institute has received $25,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Independent Institute has received $70,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Institute for Energy Research has received $147,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Institute for Regulatory Science, 9200 Rumsey Road, Suite 205
Columbia, MD 21045 USA
Institute for Senior Studies has received $30,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Institute for the Study of Earth and Man has received $76,500 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
International affiliate of the American Council for Capital
Formation.
International Policy Network - North America has received $295,000
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
International Republican Institute has received $105,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
James Madison Institute has received $5,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Landmark Legal Foundation has received $30,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Lexington Institute has received $10,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Lindenwood University has received $10,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Mackinac Center has received $30,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research has received $175,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Media Institute has received $60,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Media Research Center has received $150,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Mercatus Center, George Mason University has received $80,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Mountain States Legal Foundation has received $2,500 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
National Association of Neighborhoods has received $75,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
National Black Chamber of Commerce has received $150,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
National Center for Policy Analysis has received $390,900 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
National Center for Public Policy Research has received $280,000
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
National Environmental Policy Institute has received $75,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
National Legal Center for the Public Interest has received $215,500
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
National Wilderness Institute has received $10,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
New England Legal Foundation has received $7,500 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Pacific Legal Foundation has received $110,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy has received $370,000
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Property and Environment Research Center, Political Economy Research
Center has received $115,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Reason Foundation has received $381,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Science and Environmental Policy Project has received $20,000 from
ExxonMobil since 1998.
Stanford University GCEP has received $100,000 from ExxonMobil since
1998.
Tech Central Science Foundation or Tech Central Station has received
$95,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Texas Public Policy Foundation has received $15,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
The Advancement of Sound Science Center, Inc. has received $40,000
from ExxonMobil since 1998.
The Annapolis Center for Science-Based Public Policy has received
$688,575 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
The Justice Foundation (formerly Texas Justice Foundation) has
received $10,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Washington Legal Foundation has received $185,000 from ExxonMobil
since 1998.
Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public Policy has
received $120,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.

Who ****ing cares. The retarded moron CEO of AT&T has
received $100,000,000 from Exxon-Mobil since 1998.

wrote:

Who ****ing cares. The retarded moron CEO of AT&T has
received $100,000,000 from Exxon-Mobil since 1998.


KOCH OIL Funding Acton Institute For The Study of Religion and
Liberty = $212,500
KOCH OIL Funding American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy
Research = $50,000
KOCH OIL Funding American Legislative Exchange Council = $393,000
KOCH OIL Funding Americans for Tax Reform Foundation = $20,000
KOCH OIL Funding Aspen Institute = $1,115,000
KOCH OIL Funding Atlantic Legal Foundation = $20,000
KOCH OIL Funding Atlas Economic Research Foundation = $68,500
KOCH OIL Funding Brookings Institution = $829,400
KOCH OIL Funding Cato Institute = $12,999,240
KOCH OIL Funding Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation =
$12,906,712
KOCH OIL Funding Competitive Enterprise Institute = $666,420
KOCH OIL Funding Consumer Alert = $10,000
KOCH OIL Funding Defenders of Property Rights = $55,000
KOCH OIL Funding Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy
Studies = $1,262,200
KOCH OIL Funding Foundation for Research on Economics and the
Environment (FREE) = $1,205,500
KOCH OIL Funding Fraser Institute = $23,221
KOCH OIL Funding Free Enterprise Education Institute = $30,000
KOCH OIL Funding George C. Marshall Institute = $30,000
KOCH OIL Funding George Mason University = $4,753,754
KOCH OIL Funding George Mason University Foundation, Inc. =
$19,194,643
KOCH OIL Funding George Mason University Institute for Humane
Studies = $3,111,457
KOCH OIL Funding Heartland Institute = $77,578
KOCH OIL Funding Heritage Foundation = $1,952,000
KOCH OIL Funding Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace =
$5,000
KOCH OIL Funding Hudson Institute, Inc. = $32,650
KOCH OIL Funding Independent Institute = $160,000
KOCH OIL Funding Institute for Energy Research = $62,000
KOCH OIL Funding Landmark Legal Foundation = $5,000
KOCH OIL Funding Mackinac Center for Public Policy = $5,000
KOCH OIL Funding Manhattan Institute for Policy Research = $575,000
KOCH OIL Funding Media Institute = $80,000
KOCH OIL Funding Media Research Center = $975
KOCH OIL Funding Mercatus Center, George Mason University = $427,000
KOCH OIL Funding National Center for Policy Analysis = $517,000
KOCH OIL Funding National Environmental Policy Institute = $12,500
KOCH OIL Funding Pacific Legal Foundation = $10,000
KOCH OIL Funding Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy =
$1,070,800
KOCH OIL Funding Property and Environment Research Center (PERC) =
$135,000
KOCH OIL Funding Reason Foundation = $2,231,212
KOCH OIL Funding Reason Public Policy Institute = $25,000
KOCH OIL Funding Tech Central Science Foundation = $25,000
KOCH OIL Funding Texas Justice Foundation = $40,000
KOCH OIL Funding Texas Public Policy Foundation = $110,874
KOCH OIL Funding Washington Legal Foundation = $602,500



OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding American Enterprise Institute
for Public Policy Research = $7,022,124
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding American Legislative Exchange
Council = $215,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Americans for Tax Reform
Foundation = $525,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Atlantic Legal Foundation =
$210,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Atlas Economic Research
Foundation = $5,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Brookings Institution =
$1,217,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Capital Legal Foundation =
$150,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Cato Institute = $832,500
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Center for Media and Public
Affairs = $730,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Center for Security Policy =
$261,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Center for Strategic and
International Studies = $2,112,318
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Citizens for a Sound Economy
Foundation = $1,375,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Competitive Enterprise
Institute = $230,300
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Consumer Alert = $28,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Federalist Society for Law and
Public Policy Studies = $4,008,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding for ASCH = $865,500
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Foundation for Research on
Economics and the Environment (FREE) = $484,250
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Fraser Institute = $10,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding George C. Marshall Institute =
$350,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding George Mason University =
$6,665,824
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding George Mason University
Institute for Humane Studies = $797,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Heartland Institute = $40,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Heritage Foundation =
$8,320,835
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Hoover Institution on War,
Revolution and Peace = $5,015,660
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Hudson Institute, Inc. =
$3,034,840
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Independent Institute =
$65,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding John Locke Institute = $15,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Landmark Legal Foundation =
$320,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Manhattan Institute for Policy
Research = $4,899,500
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Media Institute = $148,750
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding National Center for Policy
Analysis = $1,069,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding National Center for Public
Policy Research, Inc = $100,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding National Legal Center for The
Public Interest = $63,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding National Wilderness Institute
=$25,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding New England Legal Foundation =
$75,200
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Pacific Legal Foundation =
$665,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Pacific Research Institute for
Public Policy = $735,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Property and Environment
Research Center (PERC) = $640,775
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Reason Foundation = $276,500
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Southeastern Legal Foundation
= $145,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Washington Legal Foundation =
$2,460,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Funding Weidenbaum Center = $94,650
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Media Research Center = $495,000
OLIN Munitions & Chlorine-DDT Mercatus Center, George Mason
University = $80,000


SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Accuracy in Media, Inc. = $4,075,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Acton Institute For The Study of Religion
and Liberty = $565,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding American Council on Science and Health =
$205,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding American Enterprise Institute for Public
Policy Research = $6,251,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding American Legislative Exchange Council =
$1,545,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Americans for Tax Reform Foundation =
$700,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Atlantic Legal Foundation = $1,530,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Atlas Economic Research Foundation =
$2,325,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Capital Legal Foundation = $425,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Cato Institute = $2,057,500
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Center for Market Processes, Inc =
$100,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Center for Media and Public Affairs =
$1,272,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Center for Security Policy = $4,001,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Center for Strategic and International
Studies = $8,443,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide
and Global Change = $100,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation =
$2,335,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow =
$1,020,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Competitive Enterprise Institute =
$1,800,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Defenders of Property Rights = $1,265,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Federalist Society for Law and Public
Policy Studies = $,980,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Foundation for Research on Economics and
the Environment (FREE) = $1,405,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Fraser Institute = $275,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding George C. Marshall Institute = $2,827,500
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding George Mason University = $1,731,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding George Mason University Foundation, Inc.
= $3,665,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding George Mason University Institute for
Humane Studies = $1,050,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding George Mason University Law and Economics
Center = $860,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Heartland Institute = $335,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Heritage Foundation = $22,296,640
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and
Peace = $9,768,900
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Hudson Institute, Inc. = $3,329,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Landmark Legal Foundation = $6,260,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Mackinac Center for Public Policy =
$100,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Manhattan Institute for Policy Research =
$3,813,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Media Institute = $645,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Media Research Center = $1,652,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Mountain States Legal Foundation =
$280,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding National Center for Policy Analysis =
$2,010,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding National Center for Public Policy
Research = $925,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding National Legal Center for The Public
Interest = $125,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding New England Legal Foundation = $855,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Pacific Legal Foundation = $3,280,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Pacific Research Institute for Public
Policy = $2,472,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Property and Environment Research Center
(PERC) = $2,292,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Reason Foundation = $2,043,500
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Southeastern Legal Foundation =
$1,750,000
SCAIFE OIL FORTUNE Funding Washington Legal Foundation = $3,870,000


White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Acton Institute
For The Study of Religion and Liberty = $166,500
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding American
Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research = $448,800
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Atlas Economic
Research Foundation = $1,524,742
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Cato Institute
= $217,600
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Center for Media
and Public Affairs = $110,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Citizens for a
Sound Economy Foundation = $35,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Competitive
Enterprise Institute = $90,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Defenders of
Property Rights = $7,500
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Federalist
Society for Law and Public Policy Studies = $380,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding George C.
Marshall Institute = $100,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding George Mason
Universit = $980,155
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding George Mason
University (Arlington) = $59,500
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Hoover
Institution on War, Revolution and Peace = $380,474
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Hudson
Institute, Inc. = $71,783
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Independent
Institute = $58,095
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Institute for
Energy Research = $5,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Institute of
Economic Affairs = $542,291
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding John Locke
Institute = $5,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Mackinac Center
for Public Policy = $113,300
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Manhattan
Institute for Policy Research = $315,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding National Center
for Policy Analysis = $35,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding National Center
for Public Policy Research = $25,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding National Legal
Center for The Public Interest = $63,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Pacific Legal
Foundation = $10,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Pacific Research
Institute for Public Policy = $134,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Property and
Environment Research Center (PERC) = $386,000
White Star Oil Fortune (Earhart Foundation) Funding Reason
Foundation = $10,000

--- http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/listorganizations.php
--- http://www.mediatransparency.org/kochaggregate.php
--- http://www.mediatransparency.org/rec...hp?funderID=13
--- http://www.mediatransparency.org/rec...php?funderID=7
--- http://www.mediatransparency.org/scaifeaggregate.php

wrote:
wrote:


So I expect the Thistle Seed released by airplanes in the apogee of
their flight to create Cool summers and in addition to bring more
rainfall to the interior of continents.


I do not know where to begin to check to see if thistle seed would have
any of the properties as a nucleating agent in cloud seeding to yield
rain such as silver iodide.


It certainly is reflective of light as I experimented with some thistle
seed today.
It has almost a wax like white coating. It is mostly white but near the
seed it is brownish white.

I checked to see if water soluble and somewhat insoluble. Perhaps this
is due to the wax like coating.

I tested for rate of fall in still air. It is approx 1 meter per
minute.

Now I used to remember updrafts for balloons and kites. So I wonder if
Earth has natural updraft currents to where we do not need airplanes
emitting in the apogee of their flightpath. If there is a natural
updraft current we simply release the thistle seed there. Perhaps the
poles have updrafts.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Wrong again!
The iodide is finely dispersed, giving many more particles
& surface area per gram than you could get with any seeds.
You might consider quicklime, which is hygroscopic, forms
one of the finest powders known to man on hydration,
and would have some small salutory effect on the acid rain
problem.
It still wouldn't be practical to lift the masses required.
Also be advised that cloud cover has a net HEATING effect
on climate unless you can arrange for your clouds to
dissipate at sunset.
MadDog

wrote:


What Global Warming is doing is destroying the old patterns of weather
and climate. Global Warming is causing more rainfall to occur around
coastal areas and making the interior of continents into desert
climates. Due mostly for the fact that hotter oceans force rainfall to
be concentrated on coasts by hurricanes or by monsoons.

Global Warming destroys the weather and climate machine to deliver
fresh water, rainfall to be more evenly distributed.

Global Cooling would more evenly distribute rainfall. Global Warming
has the tendency to unevenly distribute rainfall.


Here is an interesting experiment that would confer whether rainfall is
approx zero-sum or not zero sum.

We have recorded the rainfall in most cities across continental USA for
the past 100 years. Somewhat accurate recording. Now if we placed all
that data into a computer of each city across the continental USA as a
grid like system and analyze the total amount of rainfall for all of
continental USA in the past 100 years we can discern whether rainfall
is more of a zero-sum or not a zero-sum. There will be discrepancies
due to volcanoes like Pinatuba that create flood years.

But what such a analysis will highlight is whether the abnormally high
rainfall in Pennsylvania in 2006 is balanced by a abnormally low
rainfall in South Dakota and Iowa.

So what I want the computer to tell me is whether rainfall acts more
like a zero sum over 100 years or does not act like a zero sum. And
because the states like Florida and Louisiana in year 2005 received
much more than normal rainfall, meant that states like Colorado,
Nebraska, Wyoming in 2005 must receive drought.

We have the data collected for the past 100 years of every major city
in the USA from the size of cities with a population of 10,000 or more.
What I want the computer to tell me is whether during that 100 years,
the total rainfall over continental USA was a fairly steady constant.
But that the rainfall in city X compared to city Y varied to the point
where the deficit of one was the gain for the other.

I want to know if that 100 year past record can tell us if Rainfall is
a approx Zero-Sum (not including abnormalities such as Pinatuba of
1992).

I want to explain the 5 years of summer droughts in the southeastern
portion of South Dakota. If rainfall is zero-sum, then some other
states got the rain that was designed to fall in South Dakota. But
because of Global Warming, South Dakota and Iowa and Nebraska have a
future to look forward of becoming a arid and desert climate. We are
heading toward a desert type climate of much of what the state of Utah
possesses. And if this trend continues, we can no longer grow corn and
beans in the Midwest but have to switch to sugar beets and eventually
stop farming altogether unless irrigation.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

In article . com,
says...

wrote:


What Global Warming is doing is destroying the old patterns of weather
and climate. Global Warming is causing more rainfall to occur around
coastal areas and making the interior of continents into desert
climates. Due mostly for the fact that hotter oceans force rainfall to
be concentrated on coasts by hurricanes or by monsoons.

Global Warming destroys the weather and climate machine to deliver
fresh water, rainfall to be more evenly distributed.

Global Cooling would more evenly distribute rainfall. Global Warming
has the tendency to unevenly distribute rainfall.


Here is an interesting experiment that would confer whether rainfall is
approx zero-sum or not zero sum.

We have recorded the rainfall in most cities across continental USA for
the past 100 years. Somewhat accurate recording. Now if we placed all
that data into a computer of each city across the continental USA as a
grid like system and analyze the total amount of rainfall for all of
continental USA in the past 100 years we can discern whether rainfall
is more of a zero-sum or not a zero-sum. There will be discrepancies
due to volcanoes like Pinatuba that create flood years.

But what such a analysis will highlight is whether the abnormally high
rainfall in Pennsylvania in 2006 is balanced by a abnormally low
rainfall in South Dakota and Iowa.

So what I want the computer to tell me is whether rainfall acts more
like a zero sum over 100 years or does not act like a zero sum. And
because the states like Florida and Louisiana in year 2005 received
much more than normal rainfall, meant that states like Colorado,
Nebraska, Wyoming in 2005 must receive drought.

We have the data collected for the past 100 years of every major city
in the USA from the size of cities with a population of 10,000 or more.
What I want the computer to tell me is whether during that 100 years,
the total rainfall over continental USA was a fairly steady constant.
But that the rainfall in city X compared to city Y varied to the point
where the deficit of one was the gain for the other.

I want to know if that 100 year past record can tell us if Rainfall is
a approx Zero-Sum (not including abnormalities such as Pinatuba of
1992).

I want to explain the 5 years of summer droughts in the southeastern


The National Climatic Data Center has the national mean annual rainfall:

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/2005/us-
final/Reg110Dv00Elem01_01122005_pg.gif

It looks like it varies from ~24.3 in to 34 in.

You can order any of the data you want from NCDC, including ~50 years of
hourly observations from 2500 stations in the US.

BTW, assuming you're talking about the Philippine volcano, it's
Pinatubo, not Pinatuba.

Harold
--
Harold Brooks