Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The below is an example of GIGO and the absurdity of modeling climate.
If we are to believe the press release, the albedo effect of planting more trees will increase earth temperatures by 2F, or even 6F at certain lattitudes. Comment: this proves that even nature can "globally warm" the earth. If there were no humans, then more trees would exist and these would raise earth tempratures by 2-6F. So what are we so worried about? But for man, the earth would already be 2-6F hotter. Then the press release makes the claim "But after several decades, carbon dioxide would begin diffusing from the ocean into the atmosphere, diminishing the cooling effect and warming the Earth in the long term." Comment: if this is not a typo (and it might be) this presumes that the ocean is saturated with CO2 and this CO2 will diffuse into the atmosphere once atmospheric CO2 is removed. This, if true, shows that even if we magically removed all CO2 from the atmosphere, the partial pressures would be such that the atmosphere would fill up again with the same concentration of CO2. Like trying to bail out a sinking oceanliner with a bucket. Conclusion: indeed, as Main Street and Wall Street have implicitly agreed, as has Europe and Japan who signed the Kyoto Treaty and are not even meeting it have implicitly agreed, the best strategy for combating GW is a "wait and see" attitude, to see how things actually play out, rather than depending on bogus and contrdictory "computer simulations" from some geek's basement. RL http://www.carnegieinstitution.org/n...s_0512_05.html Monday December 5, 2005 Carnegie Contact: Dr. Ken Caldeira; Or (650) 704-7212 For images see http://www.carnegieinstitution.org/temperateforests/ Study: Temperate Forests Could Worsen Global Warming STANFORD, CA - Growing a forest might sound like a good idea to combat global warming, since trees draw carbon dioxide from the air and release cool water from their leaves. But they also absorb sunlight, warming the air in the process. According to a new study from the Carnegie Institution's Department of Global Ecology and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, planting forests at certain latitudes could make the Earth warmer. Carnegie's Ken Caldeira will present the work at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting in San Francisco on December 7, 2005. The researchers used complex climate modeling software to simulate changes in forest cover and then examined the effects on global climate. Their results were surprising. "We were hoping to find that growing forests in the United States would help slow global warming," Caldeira said. "But if we are not careful, growing forests could make global warming even worse." The researchers found that while tropical forests help keep Earth cool by evaporating a great deal of water, northern forests tend to warm the Earth because they absorb a lot of sunlight without losing much moisture. In one simulation, the researchers covered much of the northern hemisphere (above 20° latitude) with forests and saw a jump in surface air temperature of more than 6° F. Covering the entire planet's land mass with trees led to a more modest increase of about 2° F. When the scientists restricted the simulation to middle latitudes such as the continental United States, the picture was not quite so clear. At first, cooling due to the uptake of carbon dioxide would offset warming from sunlight absorption. But after several decades, carbon dioxide would begin diffusing from the ocean into the atmosphere, diminishing the cooling effect and warming the Earth in the long term. Caldeira warns against planting forests on abandoned croplands as a strategy to combat global warming, which some have recommended. But he also recognizes the importance of forests. "I like forests. They provide good habitats for plants and animals, and tropical forests are good for climate, so we should be particularly careful to preserve them," Caldeira commented. "But in terms of climate change, we should focus our efforts on things that can really make a difference, like improving efficiency and developing new sources of clean energy." The study, authored by Seran Gibbard,* Ken Caldeira, Govindasamy Bala,* Thomas J. Phillips,* and Michael Wickett,* will be published online under the title "Climate effects of global land cover change" in the journal Geophysical Research Letters on December 8, 2005. Photo caption: |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
An example and a good explanation of why it is necessary to changepast climate data. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
FIFTY YEARS OF NOTHING - a LOT more than 50 years, and a lot morethan nothing. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Flawed GFS model continues. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
The Dragon Option (North Korea) is now online | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Desktop GCM | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |