| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
July 22nd 06, 06:31 PM
posted to sci.geo.meteorology
|
|||
|
|||
NAM performance
Has anyone noticed a change in local model performance since the switch
to WRF-NMM in models that use NAM for background (I.C, B.C.) fields. Specifically we have noticed more noise in the moisture fields (w, humidity, etc.) This has implications in in local model convective performance and precipitation. Thanks |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| NAM 218 GRIB2 data | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| NAM performance | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
| CMI Weather - Performance Review | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
| CMI Weather - Performance Review | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
| cold weather sensor battery performance | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Linear Mode
