James wrote:

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...343.story?coll
=la-opinion-rightrail

Yes James, Naomi Oreskes is of the opinion that Benny Peiser and Richard
Lindzen are liars, paid liars at that. It's a very widely held opinion.

In fact, may believe that you are a paid liar as well.

http://cosmic.lifeform.org

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...
James wrote:

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...


http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...343.story?coll
=la-opinion-rightrail

Yes James, Naomi Oreskes is of the opinion that Benny Peiser and Richard
Lindzen are liars, paid liars at that. It's a very widely held opinion.

In fact, may believe that you are a paid liar as well.


I wish. I should get something for exchanging replies with imbecilic,
know-it-all, enviro robots. It's tough to deprogram them. Instead of dynamic
memory, they have the more expensive static kind. Just tell me where to sign
up.

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...nion-rightrail

Since this study, the National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy
of Sciences has embraced the Milankovitch Cycle model.


...orbital variations remain the most thoroughly examined mechanism of
climatic change on time scales of tens of thousands of years and are by far
the clearest case of a direct effect of changing insolation on the lower
atmosphere of Earth (National Research Council, 1982).
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...kovitch_3.html

SBC Yahoo wrote:

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...nion-rightrail

Since this study, the National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy
of Sciences has embraced the Milankovitch Cycle model.

It was a history of science study, not a climate science study.

...orbital variations remain the most thoroughly examined mechanism of
climatic change on time scales of tens of thousands of years and are by far
the clearest case of a direct effect of changing insolation on the lower
atmosphere of Earth (National Research Council, 1982).
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...kovitch_3.html

Thank you so much for sharing. None of us we aware of this remarkable
result. So apparently changes over tens of thousands of years in orbital
geometry are responsible for the multidecadal changes in climate we have
been observing. That's just remarkable.

Thank you so much for sharing this important new result. Now, can anyone
explain to me why I am continuing to respond to this obvious idiot?

http://cosmic.lifeform.org

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...
SBC Yahoo wrote:

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...


http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...343.story?coll
=la-opinion-rightrail

Since this study, the National Research Council of the U.S. National
Academy
of Sciences has embraced the Milankovitch Cycle model.

It was a history of science study, not a climate science study.

...orbital variations remain the most thoroughly examined mechanism of
climatic change on time scales of tens of thousands of years and are by
far
the clearest case of a direct effect of changing insolation on the lower
atmosphere of Earth (National Research Council, 1982).

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...milankovitch_3.
html

Thank you so much for sharing. None of us we aware of this remarkable
result. So apparently changes over tens of thousands of years in orbital
geometry are responsible for the multidecadal changes in climate we have
been observing. That's just remarkable.

Thank you so much for sharing this important new result. Now, can anyone
explain to me why I am continuing to respond to this obvious idiot?

Birds of a feather?

In article ,
"SBC Yahoo" wrote:

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...3.story?coll=l
a-opinion-rightrail

Since this study, the National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy
of Sciences has embraced the Milankovitch Cycle model.


...orbital variations remain the most thoroughly examined mechanism of
climatic change on time scales of tens of thousands of years and are by far
the clearest case of a direct effect of changing insolation on the lower
atmosphere of Earth (National Research Council, 1982).

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...ankovitch_3.ht
ml

Nowhere do they say anything but CO2 is causing the current warming.

"James" wrote in message
...

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...
SBC Yahoo wrote:

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...


http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...343.story?coll
=la-opinion-rightrail

Since this study, the National Research Council of the U.S. National
Academy
of Sciences has embraced the Milankovitch Cycle model.

It was a history of science study, not a climate science study.

...orbital variations remain the most thoroughly examined mechanism
of
climatic change on time scales of tens of thousands of years and are by
far
the clearest case of a direct effect of changing insolation on the
lower
atmosphere of Earth (National Research Council, 1982).

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...milankovitch_3.
html

Thank you so much for sharing. None of us we aware of this remarkable
result. So apparently changes over tens of thousands of years in orbital
geometry are responsible for the multidecadal changes in climate we have
been observing. That's just remarkable.


Only possible if you understand physics. Obviously not in your case, nor any
other tree hugging moron.

Thank you so much for sharing this important new result. Now, can anyone
explain to me why I am continuing to respond to this obvious idiot?

Birds of a feather?

SBC Yahoo wrote:
"James" wrote in message
...
"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...
SBC Yahoo wrote:

"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...343.story?coll
=la-opinion-rightrail
Since this study, the National Research Council of the U.S. National
Academy
of Sciences has embraced the Milankovitch Cycle model.
It was a history of science study, not a climate science study.

...orbital variations remain the most thoroughly examined mechanism
of
climatic change on time scales of tens of thousands of years and are by
far
the clearest case of a direct effect of changing insolation on the
lower
atmosphere of Earth (National Research Council, 1982).

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...milankovitch_3.
html
Thank you so much for sharing. None of us we aware of this remarkable
result. So apparently changes over tens of thousands of years in orbital
geometry are responsible for the multidecadal changes in climate we have
been observing. That's just remarkable.


Only possible if you understand physics. Obviously not in your case, nor any
other tree hugging moron.

And you perfectly understand how the cosmos operates, because you are
not a tree hugging moron. Got it. Thanks!

http://cosmic.lifeform.org

Lloyd Parker wrote:
In article ,
"SBC Yahoo" wrote:
"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...3.story?coll=l
a-opinion-rightrail
Since this study, the National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy
of Sciences has embraced the Milankovitch Cycle model.


...orbital variations remain the most thoroughly examined mechanism of
climatic change on time scales of tens of thousands of years and are by far
the clearest case of a direct effect of changing insolation on the lower
atmosphere of Earth (National Research Council, 1982).

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...ankovitch_3.ht
ml
Nowhere do they say anything but CO2 is causing the current warming.
and, of course, every one knows that CO2 can not cause the current warming.
gresham

In article , SBC Yahoo wrote:
Only possible if you understand physics. Obviously not in your case, nor any
other tree hugging moron.

Hi Attila,
You seem to think that being of an environmentally-friendly disposition
renders it impossible for one to understand physics.
Bzzzt - wrong answer! In this universe it's not an impossibility. It
might be very inconvenient for you in your universe, but here it's not a
forbidden state. Just a second while I redirect your messages along the 'i'
axis to get them back into your universe.
sound of 'i' axis redirection : PLONK

--
Aidan Karley, FGS
Aberdeen, Scotland
Written at Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:35 +0100, but posted later.