Gresham wrote:
Nowhere do they say anything but CO2 is causing the current warming.
and, of course, every one knows that CO2 can not cause the current warming.
gresham

No, that would be God's just punishment for
the accumulated sin of thong bikini underwear.

SBC Yahoo wrote:

Now when they can say IS, they will be right. The fact that journals do not
publish conflicting arguments, is not so much that they have been rejected,
although many were half baked, but there are several out there that simply
have not been refuted by any evidence, but too many in the scientific
community have jumped on the al gore movie band wagon to stamp out global
warming.

Ah, a Markov process generating antienvironmental posts. The rightwing
is getting sophisticated.

SBC Yahoo wrote:
"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
...
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...nion-rightrail

Since this study, the National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy
of Sciences has embraced the Milankovitch Cycle model.


...orbital variations remain the most thoroughly examined mechanism of
climatic change on time scales of tens of thousands of years and are by far
the clearest case of a direct effect of changing insolation on the lower
atmosphere of Earth (National Research Council, 1982).
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...kovitch_3.html

do you understand the difference between tens of thousands of years,
and tens of years? I know how Bushies are afraid of "fuzzy math" and
all.