thin line of cloud Tuesday attracked the attention of weather
researchers from the National Aeronautics and Space Agency in
Bandung.. Conclusion they are non-meteorological clouds... The
scientists started to study now the "earthquake clouds". The Jakarta
Post newspaper talk about Ronald Karel from Meteoquake andsays "He
devoted mush of his time to study quake clouds.. see www.meteoquake.org

You would be more believable if you could spell. "Attracked"???? OK, lied,
even spelled correctly, your post is laughable at best.

http://www.meteoquake.org/news1.html

Funny how ALL the 'earthquake clouds' are either cirrus (example 1) and or
everyday contrails (examples 2 & 3). You either live in a cave or are
unfamiliar with typical sky features. Hmmm, what a coincidence, cirrus
clouds or airplains flying in the sky before an earthquake. Who would've
thought!? I mean, the cause & effect relationship is clear as day! Nice try.
It's one thing to preach science, it's another to completely embarass
yourself by posting to this newsgroup with out any apparent knowledge in
cloud meteorology.

What's interesting here is that the "height of the base of the cloud" in
every single example is GROSSLY inaccurate and proven by the pictures
themselves. The clouds are listed as100 meters to 1km high, when it's
crystal clear that these clouds MUCH MUCH MUCH higher in altitude.



"ronaldkarel" wrote in message
oups.com...
thin line of cloud Tuesday attracked the attention of weather
researchers from the National Aeronautics and Space Agency in
Bandung.. Conclusion they are non-meteorological clouds... The
scientists started to study now the "earthquake clouds". The Jakarta
Post newspaper talk about Ronald Karel from Meteoquake andsays "He
devoted mush of his time to study quake clouds.. see www.meteoquake.org

wxforecaster wrote:
You would be more believable if you could spell. "Attracked"???? OK, lied,
even spelled correctly, your post is laughable at best.

To have ones posts reduced to ashes by a ****** who has not yet
mastered the art of reading.