sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 28th 06, 01:14 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jun 2004
Posts: 150
Default Super Typhoon Ioke

Central Pacific super typhoon Ioke is currently predicted by the
JTWC to make a direct hit on Wake Island:

https://metoc.npmoc.navy.mil/jtwc/warnings/wp0106sa.gif

Of course, that's still a couple of days away, so maybe it'll miss.

Interesting long-lived system. It has been monitored since 20060816
when it was at about 10N 143W. It's now at 16N 177E.
https://metoc.npmoc.navy.mil/jtwc/warnings/wp0106.tcw

They were referring to it as "cp0106" until today (20060828) when it
was changed to "wp0106". (But maybe that is just a glitch at the
JTWC. They do seem to have some..., err..., careless staff there.)

Cheers, Phred.

--
LID


  #2   Report Post  
Old August 28th 06, 07:20 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2004
Posts: 3
Default Super Typhoon Ioke

Phred ha scritto:

They were referring to it as "cp0106" until today (20060828) when it
was changed to "wp0106". (But maybe that is just a glitch at the
JTWC. They do seem to have some..., err..., careless staff there.)



Not a glitch. It crossed the date line, and it shifted from central
pacific to western pacific.
  #3   Report Post  
Old August 29th 06, 12:07 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jun 2004
Posts: 150
Default Designating and naming tropical revolving storms [Was: Super Typhoon Ioke]

In article , Alex wrote:
Phred ha scritto:

They were referring to it as "cp0106" until today (20060828) when it
was changed to "wp0106". (But maybe that is just a glitch at the
JTWC. They do seem to have some..., err..., careless staff there.)


Not a glitch. It crossed the date line, and it shifted from central
pacific to western pacific.


Yeah, I thought that might be the case, but it doesn't seem to apply
universally. And I'm still somewhat confused over the designations
"ep", "cp", and "wp". If you can have a "cp" east of the date line;
why not west of it too, if geographically relevant?

In the past 4 years there have been around 70 named "ep" systems; a
bit over 100 "wp"; and bugger all "cp" (at a guess, less than 5 -- and
a couple of them may have been "sh" rather than "cp" anyway according
to the JTWC classification of these things). Which leaves me
wondering... why have a "cp"? Why not just "ep" and "wp"?

A related issue is the naming of these systems. The ones I see
usually retain the first name they get, even if they move into a
different "zone"; but occasionally one will be renamed when it moves
into the area of responsibility of another met service. If there's an
applicable rule covering such things, I'd be interested to read it.

Cheers, Phred.

--
LID



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Not so super 'super' moon... David Allan uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 7 March 20th 11 10:40 AM
Hurricane Ioke Jonathan Stott uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 4 September 1st 06 09:17 PM
CHABA IS NOW A SUPER TYPHOON Louis BREDA uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 9 August 23rd 04 09:51 PM
Super Typhoon "Lupit" Elysium Fossa uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 1 November 30th 03 06:14 PM
Super Typhoon IMBUDO has sights on HONG KONG. Keith \(Southend\) uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 1 July 22nd 03 08:41 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017