sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 12th 07, 12:05 AM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2007
Posts: 7
Default Monster bushfires have generated the power of more than 100 atomic bombs

Australian bushfires' colossal effect
You can watch the bushfires described in the following article "live" via
satellite observation on the following website:
http://satellite.ehabich.info/oz.htm

Scientists: Monster bushfires have generated the power of more than 100
atomic bombs and pumped out millions of tonnes of pollution, greenhouse gas
and toxic clouds: Article Herald Sun:
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...26-661,00.html

Latest Google news:
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ne...nG=Search+News

Erich Habich for
Our Planet Earth From Space
http://opefs.com




  #2   Report Post  
Old January 13th 07, 05:24 AM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default Monster bushfires have generated the power of more than 100 atomic bombs


Erich Habich wrote:
Australian bushfires' colossal effect
You can watch the bushfires described in the following article "live" via
satellite observation on the following website:
http://satellite.ehabich.info/oz.htm

Scientists: Monster bushfires have generated the power of more than 100
atomic bombs and pumped out millions of tonnes of pollution, greenhouse gas
and toxic clouds: Article Herald Sun:
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...26-661,00.html

Latest Google news:
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ne...nG=Search+News

Erich Habich for
Our Planet Earth From Space
http://opefs.com


You have set up an excellent site that makes the best of what is
available world wide. I don't like comparisons of power output that use
nuclear fission as a datum though.

Do you mean that a piece of paper floating in the breeze will be blown
100 times further by such fires than would have been blown by a nuclear
blast?

And do you have a forum, or can one reply to your blog?



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Storms, weather no worse than 100 years ago, we just hear about it more now 7[_3_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 June 3rd 12 11:10 AM
Storms, weather no worse than 100 years ago, we just hear about it more now troppo[_2_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 3 June 3rd 12 08:02 AM
Atomic Bombs Lawrence Jenkins uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 2 February 4th 11 10:50 AM
#5 Probability definition of Reals and AP-adics-- can Earth have rain everywhere simultaneously; Monograph-book: "Foundation of Physics as Atomic theory and Math as Set theory" a_plutonium sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 November 6th 07 06:56 AM
More Water Bombs Falling on Schulin's Head -- Washington Clobbered by WMDs (Weather of Mass Destruction). Prosecute Koch Brothers for Global Warming FLOOD Damages sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 July 5th 06 06:52 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017