On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:07:59 -0600, kT wrote:

beav wrote:

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:45:32 -0500, "VistaKing"
wrote:

"beav" wrote in message
he has several hundred sock puppets working here.its unbelievable.
Beav is quite delusional, as are most AmeriKKKans these days.

Hence the campaign to eradicate the AmeriKKKan state continues.


are you answering your other sock puppet?

why bother with the sock puppet game anyway? is it to offer an
illusion of a crowd supporting the same stances/ideas/weltanschung?


for anyone that spends more than a couple days in this NG, they can
figure out who you are, just from your abusive writing style.
(example ameriKKKans...)

Actually, no, you can't.

The scientific way would be to examine the headers, but that would
almost immediately label you a fool, and we can't have that, can we?

maybe its split personalities!

Or maybe you're wrong about that too, like everything else.


you're right.

headers are another way.

so what's with the sock puppet games?

beav wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:07:59 -0600, kT wrote:

are you answering your other sock puppet?

why bother with the sock puppet game anyway? is it to offer an
illusion of a crowd supporting the same stances/ideas/weltanschung?

for anyone that spends more than a couple days in this NG, they can
figure out who you are, just from your abusive writing style.
(example ameriKKKans...)

Actually, no, you can't.

The scientific way would be to examine the headers, but that would
almost immediately label you a fool, and we can't have that, can we?

maybe its split personalities!

Or maybe you're wrong about that too, like everything else.

you're right.

headers are another way.

Which explains why you haven't bothered to examine them.

so what's with the sock puppet games?

I don't know Beav, why don't you ask Wally.

--
The Tsiolkovsky Group : http://www.lifeform.org

My Planetary BLOB : http://cosmic.lifeform.org

Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :

http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html

On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:55:23 -0600, kT wrote:

beav wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:07:59 -0600, kT wrote:

are you answering your other sock puppet?

why bother with the sock puppet game anyway? is it to offer an
illusion of a crowd supporting the same stances/ideas/weltanschung?

for anyone that spends more than a couple days in this NG, they can
figure out who you are, just from your abusive writing style.
(example ameriKKKans...)

Actually, no, you can't.

The scientific way would be to examine the headers, but that would
almost immediately label you a fool, and we can't have that, can we?

maybe its split personalities!

Or maybe you're wrong about that too, like everything else.

you're right.

headers are another way.

Which explains why you haven't bothered to examine them.

so what's with the sock puppet games?

I don't know Beav, why don't you ask Wally.


good answer.

let me type this slowly. in caps...


W H Y T H E S O C K P U P P E T G A M E S ?


could it be because constantly changing your headers prevents anyone
from simply killfiling you?

beav wrote:

W H Y T H E S O C K P U P P E T G A M E S ?

You still haven't examined any headers, have you.

could it be because constantly changing your headers prevents anyone
from simply killfiling you?

Until you actually examine the headers, you'll never know, but I'm sure
you'll continue to comment on things you know nothing about anyways.

Even a simple forensic examination of writing style is revealing.

You need to revisit basic experimental techniques.

--
The Tsiolkovsky Group : http://www.lifeform.org

My Planetary BLOB : http://cosmic.lifeform.org

Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :

http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html