Greenhouse gases hit new high
By Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent, Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:16pm
ET,

OSLO (Reuters) - Greenhouse gases widely blamed for causing global
warming have jumped to record highs in the atmosphere, apparently
stoked by rising emissions from Asian industry, a researcher said on
Friday.

"Levels are at a new high," said Kim Holmen, research director of the
Norwegian Polar Institute which oversees the Zeppelin measuring
station on the Arctic archipelago of Svalbard about 1,200 km (750
miles) from the North Pole.

He told Reuters that concentrations of carbon dioxide, the main
greenhouse gas emitted largely by burning fossil fuels in power
plants, factories and cars, had risen to 390 parts per million (ppm)
from 388 a year ago.

Levels have hit peaks almost every year in recent decades, bolstering
theories of warming, and are far above 270 ppm before the Industrial
Revolution of the 18th century. [ . . . ]

http://today.reuters.com/news/articl...-C1-topNews-10

back to the density thing.
As the relative density of gases changes over a period of time in the
"closed system"
our atmosphere and density of particulates also changes and there is
no reason to assume that these growth rates will follow any other than
either log e or exponential
where are we along the curve?

The oxygen is depleted as C+O2CO2 and there is no mechanism for
replenishment.

Large fast living animals and insects will die as the level cannot sustain
their lifes.

Cows, Birds are exaomples are we are next on the list.

It might only be months away when the oxygen level will be so low that human
life will not be supportable.

Man, clever enough to burn the stuff but not wise enough to leave it their,
we live in a closed room and our candle is going out.

Remember the bell jar of air over a water trough with a burnig candle and
the candle goes out - thats us - man the fool.


"davee" wrote in message
ups.com...
back to the density thing.
As the relative density of gases changes over a period of time in the
"closed system"
our atmosphere and density of particulates also changes and there is
no reason to assume that these growth rates will follow any other than
either log e or exponential
where are we along the curve?

"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
oups.com...
Greenhouse gases hit new high
By Alister Doyle, Environment
Greenhouse gases widely blamed for causing Al Gore
to flail his arms have jumped to record highs because
"Roger Coppock" is farting too much

On 17 Feb 2007 00:11:26 -0800, "Roger Coppock"
wrote:

Greenhouse gases hit new high
By Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent, Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:16pm
ET,

OSLO (Reuters) - Greenhouse gases widely blamed for causing global
warming have jumped to record highs in the atmosphere, apparently
stoked by rising emissions from Asian industry, a researcher said on
Friday.

"Levels are at a new high," said Kim Holmen, research director of the
Norwegian Polar Institute which oversees the Zeppelin measuring
station on the Arctic archipelago of Svalbard about 1,200 km (750
miles) from the North Pole.

He told Reuters that concentrations of carbon dioxide, the main
greenhouse gas emitted largely by burning fossil fuels in power
plants, factories and cars, had risen to 390 parts per million (ppm)
from 388 a year ago.

Levels have hit peaks almost every year in recent decades, bolstering
theories of warming, and are far above 270 ppm before the Industrial
Revolution of the 18th century. [ . . . ]

New high? What was the amount 4 or 5 Billion years ago compared to
now?

Why does everyone cherry pick data?
1801-1811
1833-1901
1920-1992
1999-2000
2001-2007
All these "dates" seem choosen to fit the idea of increasing
greenhouse gases.

Try using a 5 Billion year model, see how those numbers work.
Might see a graph with a solid line going horizontal, but this
wouldn't be what people are wanting to see.

People tend to think data is wrong when it's something they didn't
want or expect to see.

5 Billion years, get crackin

Me wrote:

The oxygen is depleted as C+O2CO2 and there is
no mechanism for replenishment.

Large fast living animals and insects will die
as the level cannot sustain their lifes.

Cows, Birds are exaomples are we are next on the
list.

It might only be months away when the oxygen
level will be so low that human life will not be
supportable.

Man, clever enough to burn the stuff but not
wise enough to leave it their, we live in a
closed room and our candle is going out.

Remember the bell jar of air over a water trough
with a burnig candle and the candle goes out -
thats us - man the fool.


"davee" wrote in
message

Is there any data on the concentration of oxygen
and nitrogen in the atmosphere over time and in
comparison to CO2?

Bob Brown wrote:

5 Billion years, get crackin

Another ****ing idiot.

--
Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :
http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html

On Feb 17, 3:11 am, "Roger Coppock" wrote:
Greenhouse gases hit new high

... had risen to 390 parts per million (ppm) from 388 a year ago.

From an incredibly insignificant amount to
an incredibly insignificant amount.

-------------------------------------------------------
Another bamboozled chump.

Doomsday grifters have run their scam a long time and they've never
lacked for chumps to bamboozle.
----------------------------------------------
http://www.saveportland.com/Climate/index.html
--------------------------------------------------
Kary Mullis, Nobel, Chemistry:

"The global warmers ... predict that global warming is coming, and
our emissions are to blame. They do that to keep us worried about our
role in the whole thing. If we aren't worried and guilty, we might not
pay their salaries. It's that simple."
-----------------------------------------------

"The continued rapid cooling if the earth since World War II is
also in accord with increased global air pollution associated with
industrialism, urbanization, and exploding population..."

- Reid Bryson, longtime eco-deep-thinker, 1971.

"There are ominous signs that the earth's weather patterns have
begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a
drastic decline in food production - with serious political
implications for just about ever nation on earth."

- Peter Gynne, Newsweek, 1975

"The facts have emerged, in recent years and months, from research
into past ice ages. They imply that the threat of a new ice age must
now stand alongside nuclear war as the likely source of wholesale
death
and misery for mankind"

- Nigel Calder, former editor of the New Scientist, 1975.

On Feb 17, 3:11 am, "Roger Coppock" wrote:
Greenhouse gases hit new high

... had risen to 390 parts per million (ppm) from 388 a year ago.

From an incredibly insignificant amount
to an incredibly insignificant amount.

----------------
Another bamboozled chump.

Doomsday grifters have run their scam a long time and they've never
lacked for chumps to bamboozle.
----------------------------------------------
http://www.saveportland.com/Climate/index.html
--------------------------------------------------
Kary Mullis, Nobel, Chemistry:

"The global warmers ... predict that global warming is coming, and
our emissions are to blame. They do that to keep us worried about our
role in the whole thing. If we aren't worried and guilty, we might not
pay their salaries. It's that simple."
-----------------------------------------------

"The continued rapid cooling if the earth since World War II is
also in accord with increased global air pollution associated with
industrialism, urbanization, and exploding population..."

- Reid Bryson, longtime eco-deep-thinker, 1971.

"There are ominous signs that the earth's weather patterns have
begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a
drastic decline in food production - with serious political
implications for just about ever nation on earth."

- Peter Gynne, Newsweek, 1975

"The facts have emerged, in recent years and months, from research
into past ice ages. They imply that the threat of a new ice age must
now stand alongside nuclear war as the likely source of wholesale
death
and misery for mankind"

- Nigel Calder, former editor of the New Scientist, 1975.

"Me" wrote in message
o.uk...
The oxygen is depleted as C+O2CO2 and there is no mechanism for
replenishment.

Plants bozo.

R