sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 25th 07, 12:07 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
Default Can mercury thermometers be bought?

I remember several years ago, on one of the local weather broadcasts,
a reporting station was out of service because of a defective
thermocouple. I seem to recall, also, mutterings as to whether a
thermocouple could be correctly calibrarted.

David Ames


  #2   Report Post  
Old February 25th 07, 06:00 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 86
Default Can mercury thermometers be bought?

On 25 Feb 2007 04:07:26 -0800, "David Ames"
wrote:

I remember several years ago, on one of the local weather broadcasts,
a reporting station was out of service because of a defective
thermocouple. I seem to recall, also, mutterings as to whether a
thermocouple could be correctly calibrarted.


Thermistors, what about those?

They seem accurate enough by using the known properties of
expansion/contraction rates relative to known temps.

Mercury seems outdated but then again some people considered walking
outdated. Personally I find walking to be boring.


  #3   Report Post  
Old February 25th 07, 09:17 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: May 2006
Posts: 11
Default Can mercury thermometers be bought?

Bob Brown . writes:

On 25 Feb 2007 04:07:26 -0800, "David Ames"
wrote:


I remember several years ago, on one of the local weather broadcasts,
a reporting station was out of service because of a defective
thermocouple. I seem to recall, also, mutterings as to whether a
thermocouple could be correctly calibrarted.


Thermocouples use the principle that a circuit with two dissimilar
metals will create a voltage that is proportional to the difference in
temperature between the two junctions. There are many standard
combinations of metals; one common one is copper-constantan, which
produces a voltage of about 40 micro-volts per Celcius degree of
difference.

To clarify: by taking one copper wire and one constantan wire and
joining them at both ends (this creates two junctions where copper and
constantan meet), you create a circuit. If you put the two junctions/ends
at different temperatures, a voltage is created. The exact voltage
difference is temperature-dependent itself, but the properties of standard
thermocouple materials are well known, and manufacturers will guarantee
how closely their wire will meet the industry standards.

Thermocouple are *great* for measuring temperature *differences*, but
knowing the difference between the two junctions tells you nothing about
what their actual temperatures are. To use a thermocouple to get an
accurate absolute temperature reading, you need to place one junction (the
"reference" junction) somewhere where you can measure its temperature can
be measured or controlled independently. A common option used as an
example is an ice-water bath (0C), and thermocouple voltage specifications
are often expressed on this basis. Ice-water baths are not particularly
practical for most people, though, so you usually put the reference
junction into somthing else and measure the temperature of that by some
other means.

You need a good volt-meter to read the thermocouple, and a good
independent measurement of reference temperature, but I've had no problems
measuring temperatures to within a few hundredths of a degree with
thermocouples, and better results just cost more money.

Thermocouples do not typically degrade over time, and
interchangeability is not an issue (due to manufacturing standards).
Accuracy is limited by the volt-meter and the reference temperature
measurement.

Thermistors, what about those?


A thermistor is a semi-conductor with a high (and negative) resistance
vs. temperature sensitivity. Again, there are a fairly wide variety of
standard sensitivities available, as well as a range of
"interchangeablities" - which means how closely do any two thermistors in
a batch have the same resistance at the same temperature. +/-20%
thermistors are pennies each, but aren't good for temperature measurement
unless you individually-calibrate them and prepare a
temperature-vs-resistance curve for each. For dollars to tens-of-dollars
each, you can get thermistors that are interchangeable to the equivalent
of 0.1C or 0.2C, which is good enough for many purposes without individual
calibration. With calibration, 0.01C is easy.

Thermistors may be used to determine reference temperatures for
thermocouple measurements.

Thermistors can degrade (and thus shift calibration) over time, so
periodic checks or calibrations are a Good Idea.

They seem accurate enough by using the known properties of
expansion/contraction rates relative to known temps.


Even better are platinum resistance sensors. Very stable, very
accurate. Very common in a lot of the automated meteorological station
sensors.

Mercury seems outdated but then again some people considered walking
outdated. Personally I find walking to be boring.


Mercury-in-glass may still be a common type of reference transfer - I
worked in a lab that had a mercury thermometer that measured from -5 to
0C, in graduations of 0.01C. It also came with a chart of corrections
between what it read and what the true temperature was, so you really
could trust it to within 0.01C. You had to make absolutely sure you
immersed it to the line engraved on it (and no further), though, as
immersing it more or less affected its calibration.


  #4   Report Post  
Old February 25th 07, 10:19 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2006
Posts: 55
Default Can mercury thermometers be bought?

On 25 Feb 2007 04:07:26 -0800, "David Ames"
wrote:

I remember several years ago, on one of the local weather broadcasts,
a reporting station was out of service because of a defective
thermocouple. I seem to recall, also, mutterings as to whether a
thermocouple could be correctly calibrarted.

David Ames



To respond to the subject, check froogle, they list many.

difficult to automate readings from a mercury thermometer, I would
think.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Magic Seaweed surfing weather site bought as part of £7m deal Scott W[_2_] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 2 May 16th 15 09:12 AM
Around the world, thermometers point to 2010 as being hottest year since 1850 (It is NOT thermometers, it is adjusted temperatures that point to 2010 as being hottest year since 1850) Sapient Fridge sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 December 11th 10 01:58 PM
Mercury thermometers/barometers John Dann uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 7 May 8th 07 12:58 AM
Weather on Mercury Col uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 13 August 5th 04 10:51 AM
What's the mercury up to? Wijke Ruiter uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 2 August 12th 03 12:40 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017