Climatologist suggest Sulpher-Dioxide into troposphere to SOLVE Global
Warming?

It was said on some documentary about GW. He said something about
pumping [sending up rockets all the time] millions of metric tons of
Sulpher-Dioxide into the troposphere to sort of limit the sun from
heating the earth as much. This guy was old, maybe in his 70s, and was
a climatologist.

Is this a hair brain idea or would it WORK?

Couldn't we also find a huge area on earth of sand or plain dirt, bury
many thousands of tons of conventional explosives well underground and
ignite it? Wouldn't this be similar to a super volcano sending many
million metric tons of dust particles into the upper atmosphere and
limit sunlight penetration?

You could pick an area like the dessert southwestern US or some area
in Australia?

Liquid TNT or C4 would be enough. We could continue to dig, maybe 5
miles down and load the pocket with these explosives. Clear the area
for 500-750 Miles and explode the area perhaps leaving crater 10
miles wide and 1/2 mile deep?

Wouldn't that be enough dust particles in the upper atmosphere to
shield the sun enough to prevent future GW?

This might give us an extra 150-200 years to fine tune some ideas to
solve GW issue.

Yes, No, can you explain why this would/wouldn't work?
thanks,
Signed concerned

"Bob Brown" . wrote in message
...
Climatologist suggest Sulpher-Dioxide into troposphere to SOLVE Global
Warming?

It was said on some documentary about GW. He said something about
pumping [sending up rockets all the time] millions of metric tons of
Sulpher-Dioxide into the troposphere to sort of limit the sun from
heating the earth as much. This guy was old, maybe in his 70s, and was
a climatologist.

Is this a hair brain idea or would it WORK?

Couldn't we also find a huge area on earth of sand or plain dirt, bury
many thousands of tons of conventional explosives well underground and
ignite it? Wouldn't this be similar to a super volcano sending many
million metric tons of dust particles into the upper atmosphere and
limit sunlight penetration?

You could pick an area like the dessert southwestern US or some area
in Australia?

Liquid TNT or C4 would be enough. We could continue to dig, maybe 5
miles down and load the pocket with these explosives. Clear the area
for 500-750 Miles and explode the area perhaps leaving crater 10
miles wide and 1/2 mile deep?

Wouldn't that be enough dust particles in the upper atmosphere to
shield the sun enough to prevent future GW?

This might give us an extra 150-200 years to fine tune some ideas to
solve GW issue.

Yes, No, can you explain why this would/wouldn't work?
thanks,
Signed concerned



No, it wont work in the long run.

What we need to do is eliminate 98% of the human population. And I am being
serious.

On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:16:02 GMT, "Rev. Chain Smerker"
wrote:

No, it wont work in the long run.

What we need to do is eliminate 98% of the human population. And I am being
serious.

I believe you're being serious. I said this once and people said I was
crazy. Think about it:98% fewer people means 98% less need for
energy/cars/pollution/etc...

Of course we will all think it's a great idea when the population of
Earth goes over 20 Billion people. Then people will say, "hey,
remember that guy who said...."

Bob Brown . wrote in :

On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:16:02 GMT, "Rev. Chain Smerker"
wrote:

No, it wont work in the long run.

What we need to do is eliminate 98% of the human population. And I am
being serious.

I believe you're being serious. I said this once and people said I was
crazy. Think about it:98% fewer people means 98% less need for
energy/cars/pollution/etc...

Of course we will all think it's a great idea when the population of
Earth goes over 20 Billion people. Then people will say, "hey,
remember that guy who said...."

Do we have some volunteers? Bueller?

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:35:00 GMT, Bob Harrington
wrote:

Bob Brown . wrote in :

On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:16:02 GMT, "Rev. Chain Smerker"
wrote:

No, it wont work in the long run.

What we need to do is eliminate 98% of the human population. And I am
being serious.

I believe you're being serious. I said this once and people said I was
crazy. Think about it:98% fewer people means 98% less need for
energy/cars/pollution/etc...

Of course we will all think it's a great idea when the population of
Earth goes over 20 Billion people. Then people will say, "hey,
remember that guy who said...."

Do we have some volunteers? Bueller?

To save the planet from the evil economic giant known as America, I
would volunteer.

"Bob Brown" . wrote ...
Climatologist suggest Sulpher-Dioxide into troposphere to SOLVE Global
Warming?

It was said on some documentary about GW. He said something about
pumping [sending up rockets all the time] millions of metric tons of
Sulpher-Dioxide into the troposphere to sort of limit the sun from
heating the earth as much. This guy was old, maybe in his 70s, and was
a climatologist.

Is this a hair brain idea or would it WORK?

Recently human beings have big succes in lowering SO2 contents in air. SO2
is friendly for us, for plants and is the main source of nuclei for clouds..
It is the last time to stop this lowering.
S*

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:55:09 +0100, "Szczepan Bialek"
wrote:


"Bob Brown" . wrote ...
Climatologist suggest Sulpher-Dioxide into troposphere to SOLVE Global
Warming?

It was said on some documentary about GW. He said something about
pumping [sending up rockets all the time] millions of metric tons of
Sulpher-Dioxide into the troposphere to sort of limit the sun from
heating the earth as much. This guy was old, maybe in his 70s, and was
a climatologist.

Is this a hair brain idea or would it WORK?

Recently human beings have big succes in lowering SO2 contents in air. SO2
is friendly for us, for plants and is the main source of nuclei for clouds..
It is the last time to stop this lowering.
S*


i like to burn stuff. im a fire bug.

"Bob Brown" . wrote ...
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:55:09 +0100, "Szczepan Bialek"
wrote:


"Bob Brown" . wrote ...
Climatologist suggest Sulpher-Dioxide into troposphere to SOLVE Global
Warming?

It was said on some documentary about GW. He said something about
pumping [sending up rockets all the time] millions of metric tons of
Sulpher-Dioxide into the troposphere to sort of limit the sun from
heating the earth as much. This guy was old, maybe in his 70s, and was
a climatologist.

Is this a hair brain idea or would it WORK?

Recently human beings have big succes in lowering SO2 contents in air.
SO2
is friendly for us, for plants and is the main source of nuclei for
clouds..
It is the last time to stop this lowering.
S*


i like to burn stuff. im a fire bug.

CO2 and SO2 should be in natural proportion in global sense. In some
locations where emission both of them is too high, removing of SO2 from the
smoke is justificated. But this sulfur should be next burned in locations
where it is not harmfull (to restore natural proportion).
S*