sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 28th 07, 12:59 AM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2007
Posts: 68
Default Monthly review of Global Warming evidence

On Feb 26, 4:41 pm, Rodney Blackall
wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

I said nothing that Stefan Boltzman is wrong, dishonest little prick.
This is the same means you do science. Twisting the truth for the
effect you enjoy more. It is grenhouse theory which does not respect
Boltzman Stefan. This equation specifies a quantity of energy that
passes through the plane of a sq centimeter in 1 sec. Your use of this
in a simple means of denoting and influx of energy to area of
radiative area is absolutely false.


I thought Stephan Boltzman (and most other e-m radiation laws) relate to
"black bodies". I have not learned of ANY gases that act as black bodies.


I have noticed that the theoretical physics of the anti carbon
religion of your country is completely invested with the **** poor
theoretical physics to support your superstition/religion. This
redefinition of blackbody to suit the false thermodynamics you use is
a principle symptom of your psychological disesase. The term blackbody
merely means no reflected radiation in the emission spectra. The sun
therefore is the perfect blackbody. It is completely gaseous. Here is
the suns spectra. Notice this gaseous body radiates at 5700K and obeys
Planck's Law.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/im...unspectrum.htm

If one graphs the wavelength intensities, it gives a false picture of
relative energies. Of course this is the intent of your false theory.
To make it look like the radiation of the sun is only in high
frequencies. Therefore you can say cute little words like 'longwave
radiation', and say that atmospheric restriction of radiation does not
apply to incoming solar radiation.

This is absolutely false. In almost all infrared frequencies, the
incident solar radiation is of higher intensity than the radiation of
the earth. It is the need of the fraudulent theory of 'grenhouse gase'
to attribute qualitive differences in the radiation of the earth which
is therefore affected by CO2. This is false. All electromagntic
radiation is composed of photons. The only difference is in their
energy which is always in integral multiples of hv.

Planck developed the radiation law. In this law, he uses the function
hv/kT, to define the probability of the oscillator for radiating
energy at a specific frequency. It was Planck's hypothesis that 'each
spectral line originates from an electronic oscillator with specific
energy hv',
The radiation law is based upon the kT in the formula and is developed
directly from the gas law and means specifically the mean kinetic
energy of the molecules of a gas. The radiation law of Planck would be
meaningless if it did not pertain to gases, since at high temperatures
only gases exist since complex molecules are dissacociated.

Deatherage



--
Rodney Blackall (retired meteorologist)(BSc, FRMetS, MRI)
Buckingham, ENGLAND
Using Acorn SA-RPC, OS 4.02 with ANT INS and Pluto 3.03j




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Monthly review of Global Warming evidence Robert Grumbine sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 2 March 1st 07 06:47 PM
Monthly review of Global Warming evidence D Smith sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 February 28th 07 07:47 PM
Monthly review of Global Warming evidence [email protected] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 February 28th 07 07:03 PM
Monthly review of Global Warming evidence raylopez99 sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 7 February 27th 07 03:51 PM
Monthly review of Global Warming evidence Joe Fischer sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 February 26th 07 04:40 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017