Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 26, 4:41 pm, Rodney Blackall
wrote: In article .com, wrote: I said nothing that Stefan Boltzman is wrong, dishonest little prick. This is the same means you do science. Twisting the truth for the effect you enjoy more. It is grenhouse theory which does not respect Boltzman Stefan. This equation specifies a quantity of energy that passes through the plane of a sq centimeter in 1 sec. Your use of this in a simple means of denoting and influx of energy to area of radiative area is absolutely false. I thought Stephan Boltzman (and most other e-m radiation laws) relate to "black bodies". I have not learned of ANY gases that act as black bodies. I have noticed that the theoretical physics of the anti carbon religion of your country is completely invested with the **** poor theoretical physics to support your superstition/religion. This redefinition of blackbody to suit the false thermodynamics you use is a principle symptom of your psychological disesase. The term blackbody merely means no reflected radiation in the emission spectra. The sun therefore is the perfect blackbody. It is completely gaseous. Here is the suns spectra. Notice this gaseous body radiates at 5700K and obeys Planck's Law. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/im...unspectrum.htm If one graphs the wavelength intensities, it gives a false picture of relative energies. Of course this is the intent of your false theory. To make it look like the radiation of the sun is only in high frequencies. Therefore you can say cute little words like 'longwave radiation', and say that atmospheric restriction of radiation does not apply to incoming solar radiation. This is absolutely false. In almost all infrared frequencies, the incident solar radiation is of higher intensity than the radiation of the earth. It is the need of the fraudulent theory of 'grenhouse gase' to attribute qualitive differences in the radiation of the earth which is therefore affected by CO2. This is false. All electromagntic radiation is composed of photons. The only difference is in their energy which is always in integral multiples of hv. Planck developed the radiation law. In this law, he uses the function hv/kT, to define the probability of the oscillator for radiating energy at a specific frequency. It was Planck's hypothesis that 'each spectral line originates from an electronic oscillator with specific energy hv', The radiation law is based upon the kT in the formula and is developed directly from the gas law and means specifically the mean kinetic energy of the molecules of a gas. The radiation law of Planck would be meaningless if it did not pertain to gases, since at high temperatures only gases exist since complex molecules are dissacociated. Deatherage -- Rodney Blackall (retired meteorologist)(BSc, FRMetS, MRI) Buckingham, ENGLAND Using Acorn SA-RPC, OS 4.02 with ANT INS and Pluto 3.03j |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Monthly review of Global Warming evidence | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Monthly review of Global Warming evidence | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Monthly review of Global Warming evidence | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Monthly review of Global Warming evidence | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Monthly review of Global Warming evidence | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |