On Mar 7, 5:51 pm, "Bawana" wrote:
The peer review process may be subject to bias toward recognized name
institutions as well as toward research that is in accord with the
referee's views.

Different journals have different publication procedures.
When I was an editor of a computer science journal,
the name, institution, and any other information
identifying the author was removed from the article,
before it was sent to the reviewers. I believe this
is still typical practice in science.

On Mar 7, 2:05 am, "Vendicar Decarian"
wrote:
"Bawana" wrote

The peer review process may be subject to bias toward recognized name
institutions as well as toward research that is in accord with the
referee's views.

It is.

There you go, tard.

retarded turds snipped without reading

On Mar 8, 2:19 pm, "Roger Coppock" wrote:
On Mar 7, 5:51 pm, "Bawana" wrote:

The peer review process may be subject to bias toward recognized name
institutions as well as toward research that is in accord with the
referee's views.

Different journals have different publication procedures.
When I was an editor of a computer science journal,
the name, institution, and any other information
identifying the author was removed from the article,
before it was sent to the reviewers. I believe this
is still typical practice in science.