sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 10:35 AM posted to sci.environment,alt.global-warming,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2007
Posts: 9
Default U.S. Record Temperatures, 26 March 2007

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:44:16 -0400, Bob Brown . wrote:

So, you don't believe that there have been ice ages?


Yes, but I don't believe 20K years ago it was "a mile thick",
especially anywhere NEAR populated areas of today.


There were no humans in North or South America
20,000 years ago if lack of bones is an indication.

Since then, there are bones to show the migration
of Asians across the land bridge at that time into Alaska
and down the West Coast to become the descendants
of most western American Indians.

So without humans, your objection on the basis
of population centers seems weak.

And I am not convinced man is causing warming
with CO2 emissions.

Joe Fischer

  #2   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 01:35 PM posted to sci.environment,alt.global-warming,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2005
Posts: 68
Default U.S. Record Temperatures, 26 March 2007

In article , Bob Brown . wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:27:57 -0000, (Robert Grumbine)
wrote:

In article , Bob Brown . wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:56:14 -0500, Joe Fischer
wrote:

I am sure that 20,000 years a ago, where I am,
the temperature was 50 degrees colder, because
ice was a mile thick here, so I am sure it is warmer
now, but I have not seen any evidence that there
is an "upward trend".

Do you live on the Pole?

20K years ago a mile, or so, thick of ice? Hmmm , sounds like crazy
talk to me.


So, you don't believe that there have been ice ages?


Yes, but I don't believe 20K years ago it was "a mile thick",
especially anywhere NEAR populated areas of today.


Look up the CLIMAP reconstruction or any other more recent
version. Then identify the location of Chicago, Detroit, and
Toronto.

Perhaps quicker: How old do you think the earth is?


According to science, about 5 BILLION years.


4.55

Disappointed I didn't say 6,000?


Actually, you didn't answer. Question wasn't what science
had to say, but what _you_ thought was the case.

--
Robert Grumbine
http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links.
Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much
evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they
would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NOAA Global update for March 2016: a huge record for March and thewarmest month on record for any month (again). Dawlish uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 2 April 19th 16 06:19 PM
U.S. Record Temperatures, 11 June 2007 Eric Swanson sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 June 13th 07 10:33 PM
U.S. Record Temperatures, 8 June 2007 Eric Swanson sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 June 11th 07 02:27 AM
U.S. Record Temperatures, 7 June 2007 Eric Swanson sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 June 9th 07 10:28 PM
U.S. Record Temperatures, 8 June 2007 Eric Swanson sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 June 9th 07 08:48 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017