Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
they only go back 'maybe' 170 years and we call these current temps
'record breaking'? why not remove all information in all history book except that of the last 150 or so years? it would be just as stupid. we could trace our family trees easier, only 150 years to look at. find me a 'record temp' of a city in 2007 and i promise you that temp was shattered many centuries ago before recording keeping. go ahead and act silly. only liberals are buying into this crap anyway and the ones raising the most hell either cant vote, dont vote or aren't old enough to vote. i.e. have fun children |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
100 Year historical records and Paleo-Climate records | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
100 Year historical records and Paleo-Climate records | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
100 Year historical records and Paleo-Climate records | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
100 Year historical records and Paleo-Climate records | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Careful with these records | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |