Roger Coppocks much quoted 150 year experiment
which said to demonstrate the greenhouse gas
properties of CO2 is flawed.
Roger says that there has no need to investigate it.
However THERE IS.
The warming effect of CO2 is due to its better heat conductivity.
This can be demonstrated very simply.
If the warming was due to a greenhouse effect then CO2
would cool more slowly than air when placed in cool air
IT COOLS FASTER.
If the greenhouse effect existed then Methane would warm
faster than Air or CO2 when exposed to sunlight
IT WARMS MORE SLOWLY.
The school children who write up their notes on experiments
are being bamboozled.
They are being taught LIES.
As the Jesuits used to say.
"Catch them young and they will stay faithful"

"chemist" wrote
Roger Coppocks much quoted 150 year experiment
which said to demonstrate the greenhouse gas
properties of CO2 is flawed.

So says the science illiterate who think's it's impossible for mirrors to
reflect light.

Ahahahahahahahah....


"chemist" wrote
Roger says that there has no need to investigate it.
However THERE IS.

The spectra of N2 was determed a long time ago, and has been repeatedly
confirmed in science since that point. There is no need to investigate it,
because it's checked every day all aroun the world, as scientists use the
data on the spectra of N2 to identify the chemistry of distant stars,
galaxies, dust clouds, etc.

Astronomers must be particularly interested in the spectra of N2 because
the star light they gather from distant stars must pass through a large
amount of the stuff before reaching the telescope mirror and being reflected
into the spectrascope.


"chemist" wrote
The warming effect of CO2 is due to its better heat conductivity.

Heat conductivity doesn't cause heating. You are dumber than dirt.

"chemist" wrote
They are being taught LIES.

So says the scientifically illiterate old man that dishonestly calls
itself a chemist.