2007 Hurrican activty a BUST [2nd year in a row]

http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/

When will you people FINALLY stfu!???

I guess 20 more years MIGHT convince you global warming is nothing
more than a gigantic TAX scam...

Hold on to your wallet if hillary wins.

Crackles McFarly wrote:

2007 Hurrican activty a BUST [2nd year in a row]

http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/

When will you people FINALLY stfu!???

I guess 20 more years MIGHT convince you global warming is nothing
more than a gigantic TAX scam...

Hold on to your wallet if hillary wins.

Dear CraMFar:

Do you like being led around by your little nose ring? Calculate the
yearly ratio of major hurricanes to total hurricanes over the last 25
years. Do the same for the ratio of super typhoons to total typhoons.
Plot the result. Note that the fraction is increasing, suggesting that, as
Emmanuel predicted, the storms that do exist will be on average larger.

hth

--
Bill Asher

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:41:04 +0000 (UTC), William Asher
sayd the following:

Crackles McFarly wrote:

2007 Hurrican activty a BUST [2nd year in a row]

http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/

When will you people FINALLY stfu!???

I guess 20 more years MIGHT convince you global warming is nothing
more than a gigantic TAX scam...

Hold on to your wallet if hillary wins.

Dear CraMFar:

Do you like being led around by your little nose ring? Calculate the
yearly ratio of major hurricanes to total hurricanes over the last 25
years. Do the same for the ratio of super typhoons to total typhoons.
Plot the result. Note that the fraction is increasing, suggesting that, as
Emmanuel predicted, the storms that do exist will be on average larger.

hth

Dear BillyAss

You're debating science and charts. You're debating the media, why do
you wish to debate people with PhD's?

Why are you so dead-set on "Human Caused Global Warming"?

Please learn to think outside the Liberal toy box.

hth

Crackles McFarly wrote in
:

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:41:04 +0000 (UTC), William Asher
sayd the following:

CraMFar:

BillyAss

CramFar:

Mine is way way more creative. Yours is obvious and, frankly, very
seventh grade, maybe even younger. Want to have a second crack (no pun
intended) at yours? I mean, you are always so happy-go-lucky and now you
seem a little, well, ****ed off.

Anyway, didja do the plots?

How come you guys are all like "do science!" until someone actually asks
you to do science and then you are all like "don't like science?" What
is up with that anyway? I think the issue is that none of you skeptics
really understand any of this climate stuff enough to have a coherent
discussion and stay on topic. Did you even read any of Kerry Emmanuel's
papers on cyclone intensification and figure out for yourself what
precisely the issue is? I suspect that you, like all the other skeptics,
get spoon-fed the issue-du-jour and parrot it faithfully back here.
(Some ****** somewhere claims that decreasing hurricane frequency means
climate isn't warming and you read that and start salivating like a rat
pressing a button for a pellet of food.) Display some deeper
understanding. Explain to me why the increasing likelihood of a storm
becoming a major cyclone is not a symptom of a warming climate.

--
Bill Asher

On 30 Oct 2007 06:34:00 GMT, William Asher sayd the
following:

Explain to me why the increasing likelihood of a storm
becoming a major cyclone is not a symptom of a warming climate.


You're taking ONE weather event and extrapolating that it is a SIGN of
global warming.

BTW, I never said Global Warming wasn't happening. I said MAN didn't
cause it.

Did MAN cause the previous half a dozen Ice Ages via burning fossil
fuels?


Can you not see how silly it is to blame man's activities on something
as complex and powerful as our climate?

I only need to point to the gloom and doom of the Kuwait oil fields on
fire. People suggested it was going to hurt EVERYONE on Earth. The
fires were put out and nothing happened.

Crackles McFarly wrote:

On 30 Oct 2007 06:34:00 GMT, William Asher sayd the
following:

Explain to me why the increasing likelihood of a storm
becoming a major cyclone is not a symptom of a warming climate.


You're taking ONE weather event and extrapolating that it is a SIGN of
global warming.

sigh

Isn't there any of you that can argue rationally, or can follow a logic
train, or that pays attention to scientific details in a debate? Or are
you all like CramFar, FooFoo, BilBo, C-Babe, and RoidRage, who can't
remember what they posted, sidestep issues, get even the most basic facts
completely wrong, can't remember whether they are citing empirical results
or model output, and when pressed resort to invective?

Goddamn you skeptics are all a sorry lot intellectually. It is no wonder
you are getting your asses kicked on the political stage. The only one who
still believes any of you is that idiot Inhofe and maybe the even bigger
idiot Rohrbacher. Even Gingrich, when he isn't banging some woman to whom
he isn't married, thinks you are all full of crap.

Y'all need to educate yourselves and come up with some credible science.

--
Bill Asher

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:55:38 -0400, Crackles McFarly
wrote:

2007 Hurrican activty a BUST [2nd year in a row]

http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/

When will you people FINALLY stfu!???

I guess 20 more years MIGHT convince you global warming is nothing
more than a gigantic TAX scam...

Hold on to your wallet if hillary wins.


Your wallet has already been sucked dry by the current pirates in
Washington. There'll be nothing left by 2009. Cheers.

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:39:49 -0800, David sayd the
following:

Hold on to your wallet if hillary wins.


Your wallet has already been sucked dry by the current pirates in
Washington. There'll be nothing left by 2009. Cheers.


I hope you included both parties. Neither Democrats or Republicans
give a damn about what America needs. They both rob you blind with
fear of Katrina type events or the 9/11 fears.

I'm worried about the 'carbon tax' which WILL happen in America.

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:12:50 -0400, Crackles McFarly
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:39:49 -0800, David sayd the
following:

Hold on to your wallet if hillary wins.


Your wallet has already been sucked dry by the current pirates in
Washington. There'll be nothing left by 2009. Cheers.


I hope you included both parties. Neither Democrats or Republicans
give a damn about what America needs. They both rob you blind with
fear of Katrina type events or the 9/11 fears.

I'm worried about the 'carbon tax' which WILL happen in America.
You're aiming way too low. Think Chile in 1973.

On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:07:05 -0800, David sayd the
following:

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:12:50 -0400, Crackles McFarly
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:39:49 -0800, David sayd the
following:

Hold on to your wallet if hillary wins.


Your wallet has already been sucked dry by the current pirates in
Washington. There'll be nothing left by 2009. Cheers.


I hope you included both parties. Neither Democrats or Republicans
give a damn about what America needs. They both rob you blind with
fear of Katrina type events or the 9/11 fears.

I'm worried about the 'carbon tax' which WILL happen in America.
You're aiming way too low. Think Chile in 1973.

Eventually the carbon tax will exceed 10% of incomes. This will be the
utopia liberals dream of....