Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "chemist" wrote The experiments that are supposed to prove that CO2 is a greenhouse gas show that methane is not. You mean that methane you farted into a pop bottle and heated with a heat lamp. Ahahahahahahahahah..... You still haven't figured out the difference between heat capacity and absorption spectra. Kook-A-Doodle-Doooooo.. And Chemist is a non-scientst too..... "chemist" wrote It is as simple as that. The American Professor who is responsible for one of the greenhouse gas experiments, the German PhD responsible for another one and Roger Coppock are all unable to offer an explanation for these facts but not one them has called me a liar. Ok.. Your a liar. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Study in Science Magazine: Proof of Positive Cloud Feedback? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
A Simple Example Debunks Positive Feedback In CO2 Warming | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
A Simple Example Debunks Positive Feedback In CO2 Warming | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Nature Fed Up with Absorbing Our CO2! - carbon cycle positive feedback | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Even Bacteria are a Positive GW Feedback!!! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |