I R A Darth Aggie wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:13:10 -0800,
David , in
wrote:
+ I R A Darth Aggie wrote:
+ On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:58:04 -0800,
+ David , in
+ wrote:
+ + this is bigger than any economic paradigm to come before. If we are to
+ + make a dent we will all (China, India and Peoria) need to sacrifice 'til
+
+ So, you agree that the Kyoto treaty was flawed?
+
+
+ Agree with whom?

Yourself. Apparently you're ignorant of the terms of Kyoto. Kyoto gives
both India and China a free hand to do whatever they like in terms of
emissions.

So, if you believe that neither India or China should be given a pass,
then you must belive Kyoto to be flawed.

QED

+ Treaties are bull****. We need radical action ASAP.

Ok, so what do you propose? and are you willing to go to war to impose
your radical action? what other course of action will you take when
the Chinese tell you to go pound sand?


As long as its a really big, back to Stonehenge kind of war.

On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 06:42:36 -0800,
David , in
wrote:
+ I R A Darth Aggie wrote:

+ Ok, so what do you propose? and are you willing to go to war to impose
+ your radical action? what other course of action will you take when
+ the Chinese tell you to go pound sand?

+ As long as its a really big, back to Stonehenge kind of war.

So no real solution, eh?

--
Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC
I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow
isn't looking good, either.
I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated.