You neoliberal anarchists seem to think you can win arguments by being
rude and repeating some fascist, pro-business mantra. Truth be told,
this is bigger than any economic paradigm to come before. If we are to
make a dent we will all (China, India and Peoria) need to sacrifice 'til
it hurts. I realize that this concept is foreign to most Amerikkkan
people, and that is why I'd really not mind it too bad if all us
unworthy monkeys did get wiped off the face of the Earth.

On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:58:04 -0800, David sayd
the following:

If we are to
make a dent we will all (China, India and Peoria) need to sacrifice 'til
it hurts. I realize that this concept is foreign to most Amerikkkan
people, and that is why I'd really not mind it too bad if all us
unworthy monkeys did get wiped off the face of the Earth.


You start first and then maybe some will join in.

Deal?

Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:58:04 -0800, David sayd
the following:

If we are to
make a dent we will all (China, India and Peoria) need to sacrifice 'til
it hurts. I realize that this concept is foreign to most Amerikkkan
people, and that is why I'd really not mind it too bad if all us
unworthy monkeys did get wiped off the face of the Earth.


You start first and then maybe some will join in.

Deal?



Lots of us have already started, Crackles.

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:44:13 -0800, David sayd
the following:

Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:58:04 -0800, David sayd
the following:

If we are to
make a dent we will all (China, India and Peoria) need to sacrifice 'til
it hurts. I realize that this concept is foreign to most Amerikkkan
people, and that is why I'd really not mind it too bad if all us
unworthy monkeys did get wiped off the face of the Earth.


You start first and then maybe some will join in.

Deal?



Lots of us have already started, Crackles.


Good for you, now leave the rest of us alone please.

Or do you not want others to enjoy freedom?

I don't drive my car with the intent to destroy the atmosphere, please
don't make it seem that I, and others, do.


Good Day sir.

Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:44:13 -0800, David sayd
the following:

Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:58:04 -0800, David sayd
the following:

If we are to
make a dent we will all (China, India and Peoria) need to sacrifice 'til
it hurts. I realize that this concept is foreign to most Amerikkkan
people, and that is why I'd really not mind it too bad if all us
unworthy monkeys did get wiped off the face of the Earth.

You start first and then maybe some will join in.

Deal?


Lots of us have already started, Crackles.


Good for you, now leave the rest of us alone please.

Or do you not want others to enjoy freedom?

I don't drive my car with the intent to destroy the atmosphere, please
don't make it seem that I, and others, do.


Good Day sir.


Your concept of freedom is flawed. Freedom doesn't mean anarchy.

If we don't wake up soon we'll be free to be pariahs (along with your
precious Chinese).

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:03:51 -0800, David sayd
the following:

Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:44:13 -0800, David sayd
the following:

Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:58:04 -0800, David sayd
the following:

If we are to
make a dent we will all (China, India and Peoria) need to sacrifice 'til
it hurts. I realize that this concept is foreign to most Amerikkkan
people, and that is why I'd really not mind it too bad if all us
unworthy monkeys did get wiped off the face of the Earth.

You start first and then maybe some will join in.

Deal?


Lots of us have already started, Crackles.


Good for you, now leave the rest of us alone please.

Or do you not want others to enjoy freedom?

I don't drive my car with the intent to destroy the atmosphere, please
don't make it seem that I, and others, do.


Good Day sir.


Your concept of freedom is flawed. Freedom doesn't mean anarchy.


Anarchy? My buying the car I WANT is anarchy?

If freedom requires a clarifier then it is no longer freedom.

How would you like the freedom of speech defined to a list of hundreds
of exceptions?

Not the fire in a theatre either, many many more.

Cars aren't the problem anyway.

Why do you want poor people to pay as much as 25% more for a
car/truck/suv? Shouldn't we help the poor spend as little as possible?

On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:58:04 -0800,
David , in
wrote:
+ this is bigger than any economic paradigm to come before. If we are to
+ make a dent we will all (China, India and Peoria) need to sacrifice 'til

So, you agree that the Kyoto treaty was flawed?

--
Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC
I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow
isn't looking good, either.
I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated.

Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:03:51 -0800, David sayd
the following:

Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:44:13 -0800, David sayd
the following:

Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:58:04 -0800, David sayd
the following:

If we are to
make a dent we will all (China, India and Peoria) need to sacrifice 'til
it hurts. I realize that this concept is foreign to most Amerikkkan
people, and that is why I'd really not mind it too bad if all us
unworthy monkeys did get wiped off the face of the Earth.
You start first and then maybe some will join in.

Deal?


Lots of us have already started, Crackles.

Good for you, now leave the rest of us alone please.

Or do you not want others to enjoy freedom?

I don't drive my car with the intent to destroy the atmosphere, please
don't make it seem that I, and others, do.


Good Day sir.

Your concept of freedom is flawed. Freedom doesn't mean anarchy.


Anarchy? My buying the car I WANT is anarchy?

Half the people buying cars that increase danger to the other half is
insane. What if I want to driven APC around town?

If freedom requires a clarifier then it is no longer freedom.

Freedom requires taking responsibility.

How would you like the freedom of speech defined to a list of hundreds
of exceptions?

In this context there are no absolutes.


Cars aren't the problem anyway.

Why do you want poor people to pay as much as 25% more for a
car/truck/suv? Shouldn't we help the poor spend as little as possible?

I don't really care about what you call poor people. They are wealthy
beyond belief to most of the world's great unwashed.

I R A Darth Aggie wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:58:04 -0800,
David , in
wrote:
+ this is bigger than any economic paradigm to come before. If we are to
+ make a dent we will all (China, India and Peoria) need to sacrifice 'til

So, you agree that the Kyoto treaty was flawed?


Agree with whom?

Treaties are bull****. We need radical action ASAP. Otherwise, we as a
civilization fail.

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:13:10 -0800,
David , in
wrote:
+ I R A Darth Aggie wrote:
+ On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:58:04 -0800,
+ David , in
+ wrote:
+ + this is bigger than any economic paradigm to come before. If we are to
+ + make a dent we will all (China, India and Peoria) need to sacrifice 'til
+
+ So, you agree that the Kyoto treaty was flawed?
+
+
+ Agree with whom?

Yourself. Apparently you're ignorant of the terms of Kyoto. Kyoto gives
both India and China a free hand to do whatever they like in terms of
emissions.

So, if you believe that neither India or China should be given a pass,
then you must belive Kyoto to be flawed.

QED

+ Treaties are bull****. We need radical action ASAP.

Ok, so what do you propose? and are you willing to go to war to impose
your radical action? what other course of action will you take when
the Chinese tell you to go pound sand?

--
Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC
I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow
isn't looking good, either.
I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated.