Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Global Warming Dominates the "Live Science" Top 10 for 2007
Please see: http://www.livescience.com/environme...indings-1.html #1 - Climate Change #2 - Arctic Meltdown #3 - Extreme Weather #4 - Alternative Energy #5 - Carbon Dioxide #8 - Drought |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:15:49 -0800 (PST), Roger Coppock
sayd the following: Global Warming Dominates the "Live Science" Top 10 for 2007 Please see: http://www.livescience.com/environme...indings-1.html #1 - Climate Change #2 - Arctic Meltdown #3 - Extreme Weather #4 - Alternative Energy #5 - Carbon Dioxide #8 - Drought Isn't live science the company that produces magazines for profit? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:15:49 -0800 (PST), Roger Coppock sayd the following: Global Warming Dominates the "Live Science" Top 10 for 2007 Please see: http://www.livescience.com/environme...indings-1.html #1 - Climate Change #2 - Arctic Meltdown #3 - Extreme Weather #4 - Alternative Energy #5 - Carbon Dioxide #8 - Drought Isn't live science the company that produces magazines for profit? Is that possible? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:05:00 -0800, David sayd
the following: Crackles McFarly wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:15:49 -0800 (PST), Roger Coppock sayd the following: Global Warming Dominates the "Live Science" Top 10 for 2007 Please see: http://www.livescience.com/environme...indings-1.html #1 - Climate Change #2 - Arctic Meltdown #3 - Extreme Weather #4 - Alternative Energy #5 - Carbon Dioxide #8 - Drought Isn't live science the company that produces magazines for profit? Is that possible? As with those working for oil companies are criticized so should those working for "for profit" companies on the other side of the debate. LiveScience should disband all profit making activities and then we can know they have no bias. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 31, 4:46*am, Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:15:49 -0800 (PST), Roger Coppock sayd the following: Global Warming Dominates the "Live Science" Top 10 for 2007 Please see: http://www.livescience.com/environme...indings-1.html #1 - Climate Change #2 - Arctic Meltdown #3 - Extreme Weather #4 - Alternative Energy #5 - Carbon Dioxide #8 - Drought Isn't live science the company that produces magazines for profit? Doesn't some paid idiot hide behind the name "Crackles McFarly?" Why can't he get a real job? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:05:00 -0800, David sayd the following: Crackles McFarly wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:15:49 -0800 (PST), Roger Coppock sayd the following: Global Warming Dominates the "Live Science" Top 10 for 2007 Please see: http://www.livescience.com/environme...indings-1.html #1 - Climate Change #2 - Arctic Meltdown #3 - Extreme Weather #4 - Alternative Energy #5 - Carbon Dioxide #8 - Drought Isn't live science the company that produces magazines for profit? Is that possible? As with those working for oil companies are criticized so should those working for "for profit" companies on the other side of the debate. LiveScience should disband all profit making activities and then we can know they have no bias. Why would they be biased one way or another? http://www.imaginova.com/partners/ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 31, 4:15 am, Roger Coppock wrote:
Global Warming Dominates the "Live Science" Top 10 for 2007 Wow! "Live Science" !!! Keeerist, you co2-agw-cult-tards are pathetic. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 31, 2:11 pm, David wrote:
Crackles McFarly wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:05:00 -0800, David sayd the following: Crackles McFarly wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:15:49 -0800 (PST), Roger Coppock sayd the following: Global Warming Dominates the "Live Science" Top 10 for 2007 Please see: http://www.livescience.com/environme...indings-1.html #1 - Climate Change #2 - Arctic Meltdown #3 - Extreme Weather #4 - Alternative Energy #5 - Carbon Dioxide #8 - Drought Isn't live science the company that produces magazines for profit? Is that possible? As with those working for oil companies are criticized so should those working for "for profit" companies on the other side of the debate. LiveScience should disband all profit making activities and then we can know they have no bias. Why would they be biased one way or another? To make a buck, **** for brains. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bawana" wrote Wow! "Live Science" !!! Live Science is a continually updated outlet for university press science news. Essentially every article comes from the PR departments of university science faculty from all over the world. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Why would they be biased one way or another? "Bawana" wrote To make a buck, **** for brains. Sorry Bawana, unlike you, most people won't debase themselves, lie, cheat and steal to make a buck. Lying to make a buck is an integral part of KKKonservative Liedeology. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
In nature, number one dominates | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
What Real Scientists Do: Global Warming Science vs. Global Whining Scientists | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Top Ten Global-Warming Myths | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Britain's top climatologist backs global warming claims | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
No severe spell While the Azores High dominates | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |