On Jan 21, 3:31*am, Doug Weller wrote:
On 20 Jan, 23:30, David wrote:





On Jan 20, 4:20 pm, Doug Weller
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:53:04 -0800 (PST), in sci.geo.meteorology,

~Nemesis~ wrote:
On Jan 20, 10:39 am, David wrote:
On Jan 19, 2:13 pm, Doug Weller wrote:

On 18 Jan, 12:46, David wrote:

On Jan 16, 5:45 am, Doug Weller wrote:

...
As I don't want David to do to this group what he's done to the
Quaker, archaeology and fibromyalgia groups, I'll try to email you
privately.
...

For Doug -

I don't want you to do to SGM what you have done to archaeology,
ancient history, quaker, environment, and global warming groups..

Your behaviour has been way out of bounds.

DavidChristainsen

Oh. Are you going to threaten to chase me out of your classroom as you
have done to people on sci.archaeology? *Really David, look at the
beam before you complain about motes.

Meanwhile, exposing Inhofe's 400 scientists:http://tinyurl.com/3butgq

Doug- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

In part because you are not a Christian, your use of biblical language
is out of place on SGM.

The Bible has been quoted for centuries by many non-Christians. *A non-
Christian quoting the Bible does not minimize the impact of the
inspiration of the words nor the power contained within. *Your
assessment here, as in so many cases with your Usenet assessments, is
wrong.

I'll have to admit David's response flabbergasted me.
Of course, he isn't a Christian either by most Christian's standards as he
doesn't believe in the Resurrection. But this is getting wildly off-topic.

Meanwhile, I anticipate a January Thaw in New England.
I could be wrong because predicting weather is an art
as well as a science. *Do you agree?

You have no credentials in meteorology, therefore, you are unqualified
to make a scientific, meteorlogical assessment of anything weather-
related. *You can guess, like the rest of us certainly, but in
meteorlogical circles your guess holds no weight. *Do you agree?

Doug
--
Doug Weller --
A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'athttp://www.hallofmaat.com
Doug's Archaeology Site:http://www.ramtops.co.uk
Amun - co-owner/co-moderatorhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/Amun/-Hidequoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You brought this matter up and I think you should face the
music that you were wrong about my having no credentials
in meteorology.

Do you understand your error?

DavidChristainsen

No, I said you had no qualifications in meteorology (you know,
certificates, degrees, whatever) and had never passed a course in
meteorology. I never said that you hadn't had a meteorology related
job, I know you were a System Integrator, but that does not make you a
meteorologist. You were a software engineer and I am sure you picked
up some meteorology. *Claiming you can use the title 'meteorologist'
is misleading. I know a lot about archaeology and have passed some
university level courses in it, but I don't sign my name
'archaeologist' as that would also be misleading.
Doug- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Needless to say, you don't know what you are
talking about. You are way off base.

Meanwhile, I'll just ignore your obssession.

My interest now is whether an omega block
is developing over North America.

David