Here's a great graphic of global yearly mean temperatures,
their error bounds, and their chronological decades from the
Met Office: Please see:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...pr20071213.gif

Plenty of global warming on our planet!
It definitely is not slowing down, either.

"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
Here's a great graphic of global yearly mean temperatures,
their error bounds, and their chronological decades from the
Met Office: Please see:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...pr20071213.gif

Plenty of global warming on our planet!
It definitely is not slowing down, either.

The graph confirms that temperatures have plateaued since 1998.
It shows 1998 as the warmest year WITH NO WARMING SINCE THEN.
Coppcock is putting his own spin on the obvious fact that GLOBAL WARMING
HAS STOPPED SINCE 1998.
--


Get The TRUE Facts At
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/index.html

Excellent Links At
http://www.warwickhughes.com/

Regards
Bonzo

"If the atmosphere was a 100 story building, our annual anthropogenic
CO2
contribution today would be equivalent to the linoleum on the first
floor"
D'Aleo


"...and I think future generations are not going to blame us for
anything except for being silly, for letting a few tenths of a degree
panic us"
Dr. Richard Lindzen, Professor of Meteorology MIT and Member of the
National Academy of Sciences


"What most commentators-and many scientists-seem to miss is that the
only thing we can say with certainly about climate is that it changes"
Dr. Richard Lindzen


[most of the current alarm over climate change is based on] "inherently
untrustworthy climate models, similar to those that cannot accurately
forecast the weather a week from now." Dr. Richard Lindzen

Roger Coppock wrote:

Here's a great graphic of global yearly mean temperatures,
their error bounds, and their chronological decades from the
Met Office: Please see:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...pr20071213.gif

Plenty of global warming on our planet!
It definitely is not slowing down, either.

That's great, thanks. You can see that something extraordinary happened
in the 1995 to 1997 timeframe, that's when the obvious beach erosion set
in where I am. Before then it was much less obvious. I remember it well.

I'm guessing we're witnessing the reorganization of air and water
recirculation somewhere at the very periphery of our understanding.

"B0NZ0" wrote:

"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
Here's a great graphic of global yearly mean temperatures,
their error bounds, and their chronological decades from the
Met Office: Please see:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...pr20071213.gif

Plenty of global warming on our planet!
It definitely is not slowing down, either.

The graph confirms that temperatures have plateaued since 1998.
It shows 1998 as the warmest year WITH NO WARMING SINCE THEN.
Coppcock is putting his own spin on the obvious fact that GLOBAL WARMING
HAS STOPPED SINCE 1998.

Can Woger talk about the length of those bars on the graph,
especially the ones with a stripe in them, and remark about how
much shorter the bars have been recently.

And look the graph over and imagine what it would look like
with the bars in chronological order, but then it becomes hard to
explain how much the "average" jumps up and down.

It looks to me like the bars for some years would be totally
above or below the bar for the year before or the year after, then
how can that be explained as a change in total energy content
(which the annual global average _must_ represent to have
any meaning at all)!

It looks to me like 2007 was the 5th or 6th coldest in the last
seven years, how can Woger claim 2007 is remarkably warm, and
that warming is progressive?

And look where 2000 is, and 1994 and 1996. Look at
where 1986 is, wow, that was cold.

And the fact that certain blocks of years seem to be somehow
connected, could that be a result of gross changes in which GISS sites
were selected by NASA officials?

Could it be the result of some countries changing from analog
to digital thermometers?

Could it be because some countries changed from human
read thermometers to automatic recording instruments?

Could it be because the airport or other development was
built close to, or at the site, or was enlarged.

Could two of those blocks resulted from the change in
observation sites after the breaking up of the Soviet Union,
and not using the eastern European sites that were 6 or 8
degrees colder than the global average?

And could the graph represent simply statistical aberrations
due to the likelihood of __NO__ record cold temperatures, because
if the wind is from the direction of the equator, it can't get to record
lows.

And the graph would convey a less biased motive if dots for
the all time record highs for each year were placed above the bar,
this should only be done by the entity that created the graph, and
I respectfully ask them to do that.

kT wrote:
Roger Coppock wrote:

Here's a great graphic of global yearly mean temperatures,
their error bounds, and their chronological decades from the
Met Office: Please see:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...pr20071213.gif


Plenty of global warming on our planet!
It definitely is not slowing down, either.

That's great, thanks. You can see that something extraordinary happened
in the 1995 to 1997 timeframe, that's when the obvious beach erosion set
in where I am. Before then it was much less obvious. I remember it well.

I'm guessing we're witnessing the reorganization of air and water
recirculation somewhere at the very periphery of our understanding.

One mofo of an el Nino.

"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
Here's a great graphic of global yearly mean temperatures,
their error bounds, and their chronological decades from the
Met Office: Please see:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...pr20071213.gif

Plenty of global warming on our planet!
It definitely is not slowing down, either.

How can you say it's not slowing down since 1998?

"joe six pack" wrote in message
...

"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
Here's a great graphic of global yearly mean temperatures,
their error bounds, and their chronological decades from the
Met Office: Please see:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...pr20071213.gif

Plenty of global warming on our planet!
It definitely is not slowing down, either.

How can you say it's not slowing down since 1998?

Simple - 1998 is an outlier, the trend proceeds to rise again afterwards.

"Ouroboros_Rex" wrote in message
...

"joe six pack" wrote in message
...

"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
Here's a great graphic of global yearly mean temperatures,
their error bounds, and their chronological decades from the
Met Office: Please see:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...pr20071213.gif

Plenty of global warming on our planet!
It definitely is not slowing down, either.

How can you say it's not slowing down since 1998?

Simple - 1998 is an outlier, the trend proceeds to rise again afterwards.


Not on the link I click.

On Jan 15, 9:16 am, "joe six pack" wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message

...

Here's a great graphic of global yearly mean temperatures,
their error bounds, and their chronological decades from the
Met Office: Please see:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...images/pr20071...

Plenty of global warming on our planet!
It definitely is not slowing down, either.

How can you say it's not slowing down since 1998?

Hey, you denialists, where's 1934?

joe six pack wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
Here's a great graphic of global yearly mean temperatures,
their error bounds, and their chronological decades from the
Met Office: Please see:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...pr20071213.gif

Plenty of global warming on our planet!
It definitely is not slowing down, either.

How can you say it's not slowing down since 1998?



How can you say "it" is? Nothing goes in a straight line.