"Talk-n-Dog" wrote
Socialists work in collectives happily, though individualism is absolutely
legitimate in research and science.

All of the worlds great scientists have been Socialists, and all are
Liberal as Liberalism is a product of education.

Einstein is probably the best example.

wrote:


Of course not! You forget, my input to this thread was started by
Vendicar's idiotic statement,

"Anomalous weather phenomena are expected to increase due to global
warming; snow on the Mediterranean MAY be such a sympton. It might
be
prudent to assume that it is, as opposed to latching onto the snow as
simplistic false proof that there is no warming. ".
As I pointed out,
extreme weather events, like snow in the Mediterranean, would be
expected to DECREASE under global warming - A. McIntire

That's MY idiotic statement. Vendicar is a clown, BTW. Any point he may
have is negated by his juvenile "radicalism".

Talk-n-Dog wrote:
dave wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:57 pm, dave wrote:
wrote:

Acutally, the people most apt to use the term "volatility" would be
those trading on stocks, bonds, or commodities.
Volatility is the measure of the state of instability. You think
weather
would be more volatile with global warming, I say that cooling would
have a more volatile effect.- A. McIntire
So McIntire is a stock broker?

So you're not smart enough to understand the definition?- A. McIntire

I've noticed that the realists quote institutions and other collective
bodies, while the denialists are more apt to cite single individuals
e.g. Lindzen and this McIntire dude.

Socialists work in collectives happily, though individualism is
absolutely legitimate in research and science.

The military is a "socialist" organization. Your unit is only as good
as your "weakest" member, so it is in everyones interest that everyone
is as strong as possible.

V-for-Vendicar wrote:
"Talk-n-Dog" wrote
Socialists work in collectives happily, though individualism is absolutely
legitimate in research and science.

All of the worlds great scientists have been Socialists, and all are
Liberal as Liberalism is a product of education.

Einstein is probably the best example.



What about DR. Schockley?

dave wrote:
Talk-n-Dog wrote:
dave wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:57 pm, dave wrote:
wrote:

Acutally, the people most apt to use the term "volatility" would be
those trading on stocks, bonds, or commodities.
Volatility is the measure of the state of instability. You think
weather
would be more volatile with global warming, I say that cooling would
have a more volatile effect.- A. McIntire
So McIntire is a stock broker?

So you're not smart enough to understand the definition?- A. McIntire

I've noticed that the realists quote institutions and other
collective bodies, while the denialists are more apt to cite single
individuals e.g. Lindzen and this McIntire dude.

Socialists work in collectives happily, though individualism is
absolutely legitimate in research and science.

The military is a "socialist" organization. Your unit is only as good
as your "weakest" member, so it is in everyones interest that everyone
is as strong as possible.


Member(s).... as with any team effort are part of the equation. Freedom
on the other hand... allows for weak and strong.

And in the military you go where - and do what you're told. You can't
spend or earn or marry how you want, and they have Hillary care,
complete Medical coverage for children and all.


If you want to be a socialist in America the Military might be the place
to start looking.
--

http://DOGi-pedia.Talk-n-Dog.com
********* Koom-Bay-Ya *********
Black helicopters are causing Global Warming...

On Feb 23, 6:00*pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
"V-for-Vendicar" wrote:
Nope, you are still too stupid to know the difference betweenclimate
and weather,

wrote

*Climate is what you EXPECT, *weather is what you GET.

Proving my point quite nicely.

So since we GOT a rise of 0.74 deg C over that last 100 years, that
was just weather.

It is good to know that we don't need to worry about AGW.

All of the worlds great scientists have been Socialists, and all are
Liberal as Liberalism is a product of education.

Einstein is probably the best example.


"dave" wrote
What about DR. Schockley?

A relative nobody, who suffered from a deep mental illness. A fine
example of KKKonservatism, rotten and racist to the core.


He was a nasty old man. One of his friends actually described him as having
reverse charisma; he would walk into a room and you instantly took a
disliking to him. He was, at one time, a young man, a nice young man, not a
particularly lovable young man. He was, among other things, extraordinarily
bright, brighter than anybody he'd ever run into and he knew it, he was a
bit arrogant about it. He lacked socialisation, his parents were, let's say
eccentric, kept him out of school until the 8th grade, so he grew up not
knowing how to handle and deal with other people. And as he got older he got
what one psychologist said, paranoid, classic paranoia. His racial stuff is
nonsense, he believed that you could tell how smart a black person was by
how much white blood they had, you could even be able to measure it.

He died alone in agony and in disgrace. His story is a Greek tragedy without
the redemption at the end. By the time he was done he was so obsessed by
what he was trying to do you couldn't have a conversation with him without
discussing this stuff, even his children couldn't do it. His wife once told
another writer that some day we may die alone and he did. He died of
prostate cancer, he had no friends, his wife who was still alive did not
have a memorial service. And one of the reasons I suspect is that nobody
would show up, including his children, from whom he was alienated as well.

His sons detested him, one didn't see him for the last 20 years of his life.

"Talk-n-Dog" wrote
Member(s).... as with any team effort are part of the equation. Freedom
on the other hand... allows for weak and strong.

Ya, the week are otherwise known as "SLAVES"..

"Mr Right" wrote
So since we GOT a rise of 0.74 deg C over that last 100 years, that
was just weather.

No.. That's climate, my stupid little **** Stain.

Why don't you get back to us when you take an adult education class, get
your grade school diploma and know the difference between weather and
climate.

MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN

Climate is what you EXPECT, weather is what you GET.

Proving my point quite nicely.

So since we GOT a rise of 0.74 deg C over that last 100 years, that
was just weather.

It is good to know that we don't need to worry about AGW.

I rather think that this whole conversation has strayed a bit off
topic. The fact is that a worldwide year long temperature change
cannot be construed as "weather" under any conditions. It *may* be
stated to be too short a sample set to be meaningful, and in this case
that is perfectly valid, however, the same case may be made with very
similar validity about the warming pattern of the preceding 50 years.
Sad fact is... Climate science isn't one.