On Feb 28, 1:35 am, "B00ZN" wrote:
snip
At least 19,000 scientists are not falling for this AGW drivel!

April 19, 2002

http://www.deanesmay.com/archives/000031.html

What do over 2,600 climate scientists have in common?

2,660 physicists, geophysicists, climatologists, meteorologists,
oceanographers, and other environmental scientists (so far) have signed
a petition saying that global warming hysteria is pseudoscientific
baloney. They've been joined by an additional 5,017 chemists,
biochemists, biologists, and other life scientists, and over 10,000
other scientists, attached to major universities and research
organizations around the world. Yet if you went by what "environmental"
activist groups like Greenpeace, Sierra Club, or the so-called
"Environmental News Network" tell you, you'd think this petition, and
others like it, never existed.

The Oregon Petition reads, in its entirety, as follows...snip

It would be interesting to re-poll these signatories 6 years on (i.e.
now!) and see what they currently think.

On Feb 28, 8:39*am, "John M."
wrote:
On Feb 28, 1:35 am, "B00ZN" wrote:
snip





At least 19,000 scientists are not falling for this AGW drivel!

April 19, 2002

http://www.deanesmay.com/archives/000031.html

What do over 2,600 climate scientists have in common?

2,660 physicists, geophysicists, climatologists, meteorologists,
oceanographers, and other environmental scientists (so far) have signed
a petition saying that global warming hysteria is pseudoscientific
baloney. They've been joined by an additional 5,017 chemists,
biochemists, biologists, and other life scientists, and over 10,000
other scientists, attached to major universities and research
organizations around the world. Yet if you went by what "environmental"
activist groups like Greenpeace, Sierra Club, or the so-called
"Environmental News Network" tell you, you'd think this petition, and
others like it, never existed.

The Oregon Petition reads, in its entirety, as follows...snip

It would be interesting to re-poll these signatories 6 years on (i.e.
now!) and see what they currently think.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Better yet, they should poll every scientist that was ever involved
with the IPCC in any way since its inception.

On Feb 28, 4:34 pm, Tunderbar wrote:
On Feb 28, 8:39 am, "John M."
wrote:



On Feb 28, 1:35 am, "B00ZN" wrote:
snip

At least 19,000 scientists are not falling for this AGW drivel!

April 19, 2002

http://www.deanesmay.com/archives/000031.html

What do over 2,600 climate scientists have in common?

2,660 physicists, geophysicists, climatologists, meteorologists,
oceanographers, and other environmental scientists (so far) have signed
a petition saying that global warming hysteria is pseudoscientific
baloney. They've been joined by an additional 5,017 chemists,
biochemists, biologists, and other life scientists, and over 10,000
other scientists, attached to major universities and research
organizations around the world. Yet if you went by what "environmental"
activist groups like Greenpeace, Sierra Club, or the so-called
"Environmental News Network" tell you, you'd think this petition, and
others like it, never existed.

The Oregon Petition reads, in its entirety, as follows...snip

It would be interesting to re-poll these signatories 6 years on (i.e.
now!) and see what they currently think.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Better yet, they should poll every scientist that was ever involved
with the IPCC in any way since its inception.

Oh! Why is that better? It seems to me it is just different.

"Tunderbar" wrote
Better yet, they should poll every scientist that was ever involved
with the IPCC in any way since its inception.

The IPCC produces a meta-analysis of the scientific literature that has
been printed.

The IPCC report is a synopsis report - a summary - of climate science.

Global warming denialists can't challenge the science. So they focus their
hate on the reporter of the science the IPCC, rather than the science
itself.

It's all so obvious.....

On Feb 29, 3:11 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
"Tunderbar" wrote

Better yet, they should poll every scientist that was ever involved
with the IPCC in any way since its inception.

The IPCC produces a meta-analysis of the scientific literature that has
been printed.

The IPCC report is a synopsis report - a summary - of climate science.

Global warming denialists can't challenge the science. So they focus their
hate on the reporter of the science the IPCC, rather than the science
itself.

It's all so obvious.....

Shoot the messenger if you don't like the message has been recognised
as a failed debating ploy for hundreds of years. Its use by CC
denialists merely accentuates their bankrupt ideology and can safely
be ignored.