sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 1st 08, 08:36 AM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: May 2005
Posts: 79
Default Claimed cooling a pack of lies.

On Feb 29, 5:58 am, Alan Peake wrote:
V-for-Vendicar wrote:
Global average temperatures from the NCDC.


1989 0.2087


etc.
Are these temps degrees K,C,F or what?
Or, are they variations from some average and if so, what?
Alan


Alan, they are deviations from an arbitrary value (the mean
temperature over an arbitrary time frame). In kelvin/celsius. Part
of the fun is figuring out what the different sources are pretending
is normal. see, clearly they couldn't all just use their actual mean
temps, cause then the fact that they disagree about the actual
temperature by amounts greater than the deviations would be obvious.

This thread is fun, you've got a couple of the more blithering deniers
trying to pretend that a 1 year drop is a trend, and the most idiotic
AGW zealots trying to claim that the cooling didn't happen despite the
fact that every source confirms it.

Cherry-picking in a rather extreme fashion, it is possible to
statistically show a significant cooling trend between 1998 and
january of 2008.

http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com...ast-12-months/



  #2   Report Post  
Old March 1st 08, 02:43 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2008
Posts: 50
Default Claimed cooling a pack of lies.

bill wrote:
On Feb 29, 5:58 am, Alan Peake wrote:
V-for-Vendicar wrote:
Global average temperatures from the NCDC.
1989 0.2087

etc.
Are these temps degrees K,C,F or what?
Or, are they variations from some average and if so, what?
Alan


Alan, they are deviations from an arbitrary value (the mean
temperature over an arbitrary time frame). In kelvin/celsius. Part
of the fun is figuring out what the different sources are pretending
is normal. see, clearly they couldn't all just use their actual mean
temps, cause then the fact that they disagree about the actual
temperature by amounts greater than the deviations would be obvious.

This thread is fun, you've got a couple of the more blithering deniers
trying to pretend that a 1 year drop is a trend, and the most idiotic
AGW zealots trying to claim that the cooling didn't happen despite the
fact that every source confirms it.

Cherry-picking in a rather extreme fashion, it is possible to
statistically show a significant cooling trend between 1998 and
january of 2008.

http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com...ast-12-months/


http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-...5121600098.gif


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Science Is A Pack Of Lies! - Opinion By Non Scientist Peter Foster N : Z : 0OB sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 June 16th 10 01:42 AM
Claimed cooling a pack of lies. V-for-Vendicar sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 March 1st 08 05:31 AM
Claimed cooling a pack of lies. Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 February 29th 08 07:51 PM
Claimed cooling a pack of lies. Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 February 29th 08 05:11 PM
Dr Snow, Coldfinger and Lies Damn 528 dam lies Lawrence uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 1 December 6th 04 06:10 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017