Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tunderbar" wrote No, 16 parts per million of trace co2 in the atmosphere causing catastrophic end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it total global destruction, is magic, and smoke, and mirrors, and sleight-of-hand, and an out-and- out fraud, not to mention absurd to the extreme. What are you Yammering about? MORON. Atmospheric CO2 levels Started (preindustrial) at 300 ppm and have increased to 383.72 ppm, with the latest increase coming in at 2.15 ppm per year. So the increase is 83.72 ppm, not 16. MMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNN And of course no one is claiming that an additional 16 PPM will trigger catastrophe. The science projects outwar to the year 2100 and beyond, when CO2 levels - without taking the actions you oppose to limite the emissions - are a minimum of 2 times higher than the preindustrial average - around 600 ppm. MMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNN N |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 12, 9:11 pm, "00NZB" wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message ... On Mar 12, 4:41 pm, Tunderbar wrote: [ . . . ] Like the Exxon-tobacco conspiracy to malign your religion? The sponsor of this fossil fool conference, The Heartland Institute, is a tobacco lobbyist. Just go to their website. Many of the so-called "scientists" denying global warming are also are tobacco lobbyists, too. Fred Singer is just one notorious example. The Canadian Broadcasting Company did a video that explains the reasons for the Fossil Fool - Tobacco Lobby connection. Please see:http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...84499045867811 ***************** What the f---k is a "tobacco lobbyist"? Is it someone who CORRECTLY explained that second hand smoke does not cause cancer? Of course, breathing in something that contains dozens of known carcinogens does not cause cancer! Bullets don't cause wounds, fire doesn't cause burns, and impacts don't cause bruises either. When it's sufficiently advanced that you don't understand it, it's magic! Please explain what you regard as such. Warmest Regards Bonzo ". researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Solar Research in Germany report the sun has been burning more brightly over the last 60 years, accounting for the 1 degree Celsius increase in Earth's temperature over the last 100 years."http://ibdeditorial.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=287279412587175 P |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 2:09*pm, Lloyd wrote:
On Mar 12, 9:11 pm, "00NZB" wrote: "Roger Coppock" wrote in message ... On Mar 12, 4:41 pm, Tunderbar wrote: [ . . . ] Like the Exxon-tobacco conspiracy to malign your religion? The sponsor of this fossil fool conference, The Heartland Institute, is a tobacco lobbyist. Just go to their website. *Many of the so-called "scientists" denying global warming are also are tobacco lobbyists, too. *Fred Singer is just one notorious example. *The Canadian Broadcasting Company did a video that explains the reasons for the Fossil Fool - Tobacco Lobby connection. Please see:http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...84499045867811 ***************** What the f---k is a "tobacco lobbyist"? Is it someone who CORRECTLY explained that second hand smoke does not cause cancer? Of course, breathing in something that contains dozens of known carcinogens does not cause cancer! *Bullets don't cause wounds, fire doesn't cause burns, and impacts don't cause bruises either. *When it's sufficiently advanced that you don't understand it, it's magic! Please explain what you regard as such. Warmest Regards Bonzo ". researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Solar Research in Germany report the sun has been burning more brightly over the last 60 years, accounting for the 1 degree Celsius increase in Earth's temperature over the last 100 years."http://ibdeditorial.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=287279412587175 P- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, 16 parts per million of trace co2 in the atmosphere causing catastrophic end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it total global destruction, is magic, and smoke, and mirrors, and sleight-of-hand, and an out-and- out fraud, not to mention absurd to the extreme. The rest that you speak of is real. Unfortunately for you, all these silly littel strawman arguments only make you guys look more the fool. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Global warming alarmism US style! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Obama escalates global warming alarmism | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Global Warming Alarmism Swamps Debate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Man the Lifeboats - Global Warming Alarmism Is Swamping Debate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
'Earthshine' fall heats global warming debate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |