V-for-Vendicar wrote:
"David Moss" wrote
Libertarianism is based on the concept of informed consent.
Children are not in a position where they are fully aware of the
consequences of engaging in certain activities, hence cannot provide
informed consent for them to occur.

And that makes David Moss another Libertairan Liar.


From the Libertarian Party Platform..

21. CHILDREN'S RIGHTS

Children are human beings and, as such, have all the rights of human
beings.

...

We oppose all laws that empower government officials to seize children
and make them "wards of the state" or, by means of child labor laws
and compulsory education, to infringe on their freedom to work or
learn as they choose. We oppose all legally created or sanctioned
discrimination against (or in favor of) children, just as we oppose
government discrimination directed at any other artificially defined
sub-category of human beings. Specifically we oppose ordinances that
outlaw adults-only apartment housing.

We also support the repeal of all laws establishing any category of
crimes applicable to children for which adults would not be similarly
vulnerable, such as curfew, smoking, and alcoholic beverage laws, and
other status offenses. Similarly, we favor the repeal of "stubborn
child" laws and laws establishing the category of "persons in need of
supervision." We call for an end to the practice in many states of
jailing children not accused of any crime. We seek the repeal of all
"children's codes" or statutes which abridge due process protections
for young people. We further favor the abolition of the juvenile
court system, so that juveniles will be held fully responsible for
their crimes.

Whenever parents or other guardians are unable or unwilling to care
for their children, those guardians have the right to seek other
persons who are willing to assume guardianship, and children have the
right to seek other guardians who place a higher value on their lives.
Accordingly, we oppose all laws that impede these processes, notably
those restricting private adoption services or those forcing children
to remain in the custody of their parents against their will.

Children should always have the right to establish their maturity by
assuming administration and protection of their own rights, ending
dependency upon their parents or other guardians and assuming all the
responsibilities of adulthood.



This says the government can't *discriminate* against children. The
parents are the care givers and the rule makers when it comes to smoking
and any other family issues, not the government.


You seem preoccupied with having sex with children.



--

http://Talk-n-Dog.org
********* Koom-Bay-Ya *********
If your not the lead dog, the view never changes.

"watch-dog" wrote in message
...
V-for-Vendicar wrote:
"David Moss" wrote
Libertarianism is based on the concept of informed consent.
Children are not in a position where they are fully aware of the
consequences of engaging in certain activities, hence cannot provide
informed consent for them to occur.

And that makes David Moss another Libertairan Liar.


From the Libertarian Party Platform..

21. CHILDREN'S RIGHTS

Children are human beings and, as such, have all the rights of human
beings.

...

We oppose all laws that empower government officials to seize children
and make them "wards of the state" or, by means of child labor laws
and compulsory education, to infringe on their freedom to work or
learn as they choose. We oppose all legally created or sanctioned
discrimination against (or in favor of) children, just as we oppose
government discrimination directed at any other artificially defined
sub-category of human beings. Specifically we oppose ordinances that
outlaw adults-only apartment housing.

We also support the repeal of all laws establishing any category of
crimes applicable to children for which adults would not be similarly
vulnerable, such as curfew, smoking, and alcoholic beverage laws, and
other status offenses. Similarly, we favor the repeal of "stubborn
child" laws and laws establishing the category of "persons in need of
supervision." We call for an end to the practice in many states of
jailing children not accused of any crime. We seek the repeal of all
"children's codes" or statutes which abridge due process protections
for young people. We further favor the abolition of the juvenile
court system, so that juveniles will be held fully responsible for
their crimes.

Whenever parents or other guardians are unable or unwilling to care
for their children, those guardians have the right to seek other
persons who are willing to assume guardianship, and children have the
right to seek other guardians who place a higher value on their lives.
Accordingly, we oppose all laws that impede these processes, notably
those restricting private adoption services or those forcing children
to remain in the custody of their parents against their will.

Children should always have the right to establish their maturity by
assuming administration and protection of their own rights, ending
dependency upon their parents or other guardians and assuming all the
responsibilities of adulthood.

This says the government can't *discriminate* against children. The
parents are the care givers and the rule makers when it comes to smoking
and any other family issues, not the government.


You seem preoccupied with having sex with children.

Maybr a NAMBLA member.

"V-for-Vendicar" wrote in message
...

"James" wrote
Maybr a NAMBLA member.

Unlike you James, I don't get excited at the thought of little boys. Or
older men for that matter.

But you are right, Nambla members are typically Libertarian. Your
inside information just confirms the correlation.

and you know this how?

"James" wrote
Maybr a NAMBLA member.

Unlike you James, I don't get excited at the thought of little boys. Or
older men for that matter.

But you are right, Nambla members are typically Libertarian. Your inside
information just confirms the correlation.

"watch-dog" wrote
This says the government can't *discriminate* against children.

Absolutely, so in Libertopia if an 18 year old has the right to suck cocks
for money, then since the government can't discriminate against little
children, so too must an 8 year old have the same right. Anything else
would be *discrimination* against the child.

The alternative would be to make selling blow jobs illegal in Libertopia.
But as we all know, Prostitution is protected commerce in Libertarian Land.

And so is Child Prostitution.

Exactly what the Pedophiles in the Libertarian party have always wanted.

Want some Candy Little Girl?

On Mar 24, 5:38*am, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
"watch-dog" wrote

This says the government can't *discriminate* against children.

* Absolutely, so in Libertopia if an 18 year old has the right to suck cocks
for money, then since the government can't discriminate against little
children, so too must an 8 year old have the same right. *Anything else
would be *discrimination* against the child.

an outright lie but, i'm sure that won't stop you and your sick rants
about it, just to get attention. actually you're starting to get
really boring about the subject.

when everyone else ignores you for the boring troll bait you are, then
you'll claim moral victory because people stopped responding to your
foul spews. typical leftist behavior. transparent as hell, to boot.

* The alternative would be to make selling blow jobs illegal in Libertopia.
But as we all know, Prostitution is protected commerce in Libertarian Land..

you have yet to show us a libertarian leader that claims that
prostitution by children exists in the libertarian platform or that
any libertarian would be in favor of it. admit it, vendicar, you hate
freedom & think that all people should be enslaved for the "good" of
advancing the power of the state. you just can't be honest enough to
come right out with it.



* And so is Child Prostitution.

* Exactly what the Pedophiles in the Libertarian party have always wanted.

only says sickos like you. actually only you. your kkkomrades in arms
have abandoned you on this goofy issue.

use a flamethrower to push the off button on your computer if you
really want to be of help, you are as boring as you are creepy.

how you like them apples?


aardvark

"James" wrote
and you know this how?

Your own respons just confirmed it.

Thanx for playing.

"Aardvark" wrote in message
...
On Mar 24, 5:38 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
"watch-dog" wrote

This says the government can't *discriminate* against children.

Absolutely, so in Libertopia if an 18 year old has the right to suck cocks
for money, then since the government can't discriminate against little
children, so too must an 8 year old have the same right. Anything else
would be *discrimination* against the child.

an outright lie but, i'm sure that won't stop you and your sick rants
about it, just to get attention. actually you're starting to get
really boring about the subject.

when everyone else ignores you for the boring troll bait you are, then
you'll claim moral victory because people stopped responding to your
foul spews. typical leftist behavior. transparent as hell, to boot.

The alternative would be to make selling blow jobs illegal in Libertopia.
But as we all know, Prostitution is protected commerce in Libertarian
Land.

you have yet to show us a libertarian leader that claims that
prostitution by children exists in the libertarian platform or that
any libertarian would be in favor of it.

So what?

Absolutely, so in Libertopia if an 18 year old has the right to suck cocks
for money, then since the government can't discriminate against little
children, so too must an 8 year old have the same right. Anything else
would be *discrimination* against the child.


"Aardvark" wrote
An outright lie

Yes you are lying. But then All Libertairans are Liars.

The Libertarian Party Platform is quite clear on it's virluent opposition
to any special laws that either benefit or act to the detrement of children.

From the Libertairan party platform...

"We also support the repeal of all laws establishing any category of crimes
applicable to children for which adults would not be similarly vulnerable,
such as curfew, smoking, and alcoholic beverage laws, and other status
offenses. Similarly, we favor the repeal of "stubborn child" laws and laws
establishing the category of "persons in need of supervision."


"Aardvark" wrote
"when everyone else ignores you for the boring troll bait you are, then
you'll claim moral victory because people stopped responding to your
foul spews. typical leftist behavior. transparent as hell, to boot."

Prepping to run away are you? You PEDO COWARD.


The alternative would be to make selling blow jobs illegal in Libertopia.
But as we all know, Prostitution is protected commerce in Libertarian
Land.



"Aardvark" wrote
You have yet to show us a libertarian leader that claims that
prostitution by children exists in the libertarian platform or that
any libertarian would be in favor of it.

From the Libertarian Pedo Party Platform... The Child Prostitution Pimp
Clause

"Whenever parents or other guardians are unable or unwilling to care for
their children, those guardians have the right to seek other persons who are
willing to assume guardianship, and children have the right to seek other
guardians who place a higher value on their lives. Accordingly, we oppose
all laws that impede these processes, notably those restricting private
adoption services or those forcing children to remain in the custody of
their parents against their will."

"V-for-Vendicar" wrote in message
...

Absolutely, so in Libertopia if an 18 year old has the right to suck
cocks
for money, then since the government can't discriminate against little
children, so too must an 8 year old have the same right. Anything else
would be *discrimination* against the child.


"Aardvark" wrote
An outright lie

Yes you are lying. But then All Libertairans are Liars.

I am a Saggitarius, and usually tell the truth.

Why do we get all this irrelevant material on sci.environment? Could you,
and the person/s you are arguing with, find another Usenet group where the
readers would actually be interested in this type of issue?