sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 24th 08, 03:32 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.skeptic,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2007
Posts: 181
Default Wacky Climate Models Can't Predict Anything!

On Mar 22, 7:01 pm, "0N0ZB" wrote:
You need a deeeeeep faith to believe anything these crappy climate
models predict!

A Comparison Of Tropical Temperature Trends With Model Predictions

David H. Douglass,a* John R. Christy,b Benjamin D. Pearsona? and S. Fred
Singerc,d

a Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester,
Rochester, NY 14627, USA

b Department of Atmospheric Science and Earth System Science Center,
University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA

c Science and Environmental Policy Project, Arlington, VA 22202, USA

d University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA

11 Oct 2007

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/DOUGLASPAPER.pdf

ABSTRACT: We examine tropospheric temperature trends of 67 runs from 22
'Climate of the 20th Century' model simulations and try to reconcile
them with the best available updated observations (in the tropics during
the satellite era).

Model results and observed temperature trends are in disagreement in
most of the tropical troposphere, being separated by more than twice the
uncertainty of the model mean. In layers near 5 km, the modelled trend
is 100 to 300% higher than observed, and, above 8 km, modelled and
observed trends have opposite signs. These conclusions contrast strongly
with those of recent publications based on essentially the same data.
Copyright ? 2007 Royal Meteorological Society

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY

Int. J. Climatol. (2007)

Published online in Wiley InterScience

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/joc.1651

Warmest Regards

Boonzoo

"In scientific circles, C02 is referred to as a `trace gas' that, for
hundreds of thousands of years, has remained at or below five
ten-thousandths of the atmosphere by volume.


So? Arsenic is a trace element.

Even among the so-called
`greenhouse gases' (GHG), C02 accounts for less than 4%, with water
vapour being by far the most significant GHG.


Irrelevant.

C02 is clearly a
miniscule component of the massive mechanisms that create climate and
cause climate change."


You're clearly ignorant.

Dr. Timothy Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(NRSP.com), Former Professor Of Climatology, University of Winnipeg


Oh wow, Singer. Well, we know it's fraudulent then.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AGW Zealots In A Furious Lather As Warmist Models Shown To Be Unable To Even Predict The Past Sapient Fridge sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 December 13th 10 07:35 PM
Think-Tank Says Trained Chimp Can Predict Hurricanes Better Than NOAA. And Puts it to the Test Eric Gisin[_2_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 May 18th 10 11:27 PM
Piers can now predict Volcanic eruptions. Dawlish uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 4 April 23rd 10 01:27 PM
James Failed to Learn Anything About Climate Models From Fossil FoolBlogs Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 13 May 13th 09 07:39 PM
Gore's Wacky Facts Lloyd sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 February 19th 08 07:00 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017