Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 8:14 pm, "0N0ZB" wrote:
"Lloyd" wrote in message ... On Mar 24, 5:00 pm, "James" wrote: On March 14, 2007 Lord Monckton of Brenchley challenged you to debate your position on global warming, but your refusal only strengthens their position. We urge you to debate Lord Monckton of Brenchley, or otherwise admit that the causal link between man and global warming is spurious. Sign petition athttp://tinyurl.com/3b74e8 The debate takes place in scientific journals all the time. Huh? Where? Do you have links? Read the scientific journals. Tell me, what is the ratio of articles disagreeing with AGW vs those agreeing? Warmest Regards Bonzo Get The TRUE Facts At http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/index.html Excellent Links At http://www.warwickhughes.com/ "...and I think future generations are not going to blame us for anything except for being silly, for letting a few tenths of a degree panic us" Dr. Richard Lindzen, Professor of Meteorology MIT and Member of the National Academy of Sciences "What most commentators-and many scientists-seem to miss is that the only thing we can say with certainly about climate is that it changes" Dr. Richard Lindzen [most of the current alarm over climate change is based on] "inherently untrustworthy climate models, similar to those that cannot accurately forecast the weather a week from now." Dr. Richard Lindzen |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lloyd wrote:
Read the scientific journals. Tell me, what is the ratio of articles disagreeing with AGW vs those agreeing? Again, Lloyd thinks you VOTE to decide truth. Majority rules. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 25, 1:19 pm, "Cat_in_awe" wrote:
Lloyd wrote: Read the scientific journals. Tell me, what is the ratio of articles disagreeing with AGW vs those agreeing? Again, Lloyd thinks you VOTE to decide truth. Majority rules. -- Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com And why is that not superior to just 2 people in a debate? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cat_in_awe" wrote Again, Lloyd thinks you VOTE to decide truth. Majority rules. The Cat thinks he is a butterfly dreaming that he is a cat. Most people disagree, and just think he is a fool. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Global Warming Alarmism Swamps Debate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Man the Lifeboats - Global Warming Alarmism Is Swamping Debate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Media Censors Global Warming Debate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Floods Intensify Global Warming Debate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
'Earthshine' fall heats global warming debate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |