On Apr 12, 6:04 am, "0BN0Z"
wrote:
"John M." wrote in message

...



On Apr 11, 3:24 am, Poetic Justice -n-
Dog.com wrote:
Al Bedo wrote:
Roger Coppock wrote:
On Apr 10, 7:01 am, Tunderbar wrote:
OK, so far no agwer will admit that there is anything at all good
about global warming, other than one who said that it will kill
humans
and one that said that when agw hits, supporters of the oil
industry
will be torn limb from limb. Not exactly answering the question,
but
certainly showing some interesting trend of bias and agenda.

No bias, Dunderbar, beyond the simple fact that when
masses of people are starved they get mad.

So far the masses that are starving are due to a stupid response
(Ethanol) to a non-problem: globull worming.

Masses are starving due to Liberals that aren't starving.

Thomas Malthus explained the inevitable occurrence of food shortages
over two centuries ago.

And he was wrong.

As annual global average food supply has not increased in line with
population increases, he seems to have been spot on.

Starvation was on the decrease until the madness of the AGW biofuel
agenda started pushing food prices up recently.

Malthus did not engage in dotting 'i's and crossing 't's. He observed
the rather obvious connection between two fundamental variables and
extrapolated likely trends in each.

Obviously Malthus couldn't foresee the madness of the rabid socialist
biofuel agenda!

Oh. So market forces are because of socialism, are they. You need a
few lessons in how global capitalism operates and its differences from
demand economics.