Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NO WAY there'll be a global cool down for a decade considering all the
anxcient ice which has been lost in the Arctic over recent years. On Apr 30, 10:57*pm, "0BZN0" wrote: "raylopez99" wrote in message ... Here is what the liberal NY Times says about today's global *cooling*. Read it and weep 'tards. *********************** ROTFLMAO *********************** May 1, 2008 In a New Climate Model, Short-Term Cooling in a Warmer World By ANDREW C. REVKIN ******************* Fudge factors adjusted!!! ********************** After decades of research that sought, and found, evidence of a human influence on the earth’s climate, climatologists are beginning to shift to a new and similarly daunting enterprise: creating decade-long forecasts for climate, just as meteorologists routinely generate weeklong forecasts for weather. One of the first attempts to look ahead a decade, using computer simulations and measurements of ocean temperatures, predicts a slight cooling of Europe and North America, probably related to shifting currents and patterns in the oceans. ********************* ABSOLUTE GARBAGE Global cooling came as a complete surprise to the climate model ******s! Those crappy climate modellers were not saying anything about global cooling until it was sprung on them and they had to adjust their fudge factors! A disclaimer seems appropriate here ... Disclaimer * The projections are based on results from computer models that involve simplifications of real physical processes that are not fully understood. Accordingly, no responsibility will be accepted by CSIRO for the accuracy of the projections inferred from this brochure or for any person's interpretations, deductions, conclusions or actions in reliance on this information. And further: * Climate model responses are most uncertain in how they represent feedback effects, particularly those dealing with changes to cloud regimes, biological effects and ocean-atmosphere interactions. The coarse spatial resolution of climate models also remains a limitation on their ability to simulate the details of regional climate change. Future climate change will also be influenced by other, largely unpredictable, factors such as changes in solar radiation, volcanic eruptions and chaotic variations within the climate system itself. Rapid climate change, or a step-like climate response to the enhanced greenhouse effect, is possible but its likelihood cannot be defined. Because changes outside the ranges given here cannot be ruled out, these projections should be considered with caution. Warmest Regards Bonzo “Every year they recalibrate their computer model and put in the observed temperature. So, as they go along, the curve that trails behind is perfect. It’s like predicting the morning’s weather at six-o’clock in the evening..” Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Professor Emeritus Geology, Western Washington University |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fast Pat wrote:
NO WAY there'll be a global cool down for a decade considering all the anxcient ice which has been lost in the Arctic over recent years. As my contribution to the recycling movement, I fully support efforts towards new ice creation throughout the Arctic. The anxcient (sic) ice had it's day, it's time for NEW ICE! -- Gregg C. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
La Nina & the Jet Stream - The Times article | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Sunday Times article about the global warmingistas. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
GIGO-an example of a flawed GW GCM (why doing nothing is a good GW option) | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Desktop GCM | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
UK enlists world's help to predict climate | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |