"Whata Fool" wrote
Isn't that great, with any luck and enough rain, harvest should
be really great this year, with the US farmer _FINALLY_ making enough
profit to upgrade equipment and invest in more acreage and possibly
create jobs if there are any people willing to work.

That is good news for the U.S. farmer. Maybe they will be able to pay for
their fuel and fertilizer this year.

"Peter Franks" wrote
Irrelevant. Only data for the last 200 years (according to your
definition of the "global warming" relevance period.

Oh, the Vostock ice cores go back a lot longer than that.

**** Sucker.

Here are the global average temperatures since 1958. "o" = trend line.

Look at all those "o"'s lined up there. The trend is up, Up, UP.

And most recently the rate of increase is about 2'C per century.

View with mono spaced font.

1958 14.08 *******o***************
1959 14.06 ********o************
1960 13.99 *********o******
1961 14.08 **********o************
1962 14.04 ***********o********
1963 14.08 ************o**********
1964 13.79 **===========o
1965 13.89 *********====o
1966 13.97 **************o
1967 14.00 ***************o*
1968 13.96 **************==o
1969 14.08 *****************o*****
1970 14.03 ******************o
1971 13.90 **********=========o
1972 14.00 *****************===o
1973 14.14 ********************o******
1974 13.92 ***********==========o
1975 13.95 *************=========o
1976 13.84 ******=================o
1977 14.13 ************************o*
1978 14.02 ******************=======o
1979 14.09 ***********************===o
1980 14.18 ***************************o**
1981 14.27 ****************************o*******
1982 14.05 ********************========o
1983 14.26 *****************************o*****
1984 14.09 ***********************=======o
1985 14.06 *********************==========o
1986 14.13 **************************======o
1987 14.27 *********************************o**
1988 14.31 **********************************o****
1989 14.19 ******************************=====o
1990 14.38 ************************************o*******
1991 14.35 ************************************o****
1992 14.12 *************************============o
1993 14.14 ****************************===========o
1994 14.24 **********************************=====o
1995 14.38 ****************************************o***
1996 14.30 **************************************===o
1997 14.40 ******************************************o**
1998 14.57 *******************************************o****** *******
1999 14.33 ****************************************===o
2000 14.33 ****************************************====o
2001 14.48 *********************************************o**** *
2002 14.56 **********************************************o*** ******
2003 14.55 ***********************************************o** *****
2004 14.49 ************************************************o* *
2005 14.62 *************************************************o **********
2006 14.54 ************************************************** o****
2007 14.57 ************************************************** *o*****
------------------------------------------- Temperature

Correlation Coefficient .8529209

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VMu14mBXAs

V for Vendicar wrote:

Here are the global average temperatures since 1958. "o" = trend line.

Look at all those "o"'s lined up there. The trend is up, Up, UP.

No, no.

DOWN, DOWN.

Grahama

"V for Vendicar" m
wrote in message ...
Here are the global average temperatures since 1958.
"o" = trend line.

Big ****ing whoop, VD Scotty. They knew that before
1958 and their trend line in much more impressive
then your own phony, silly & wrong graph. Look he
http://www.jonco48.com/blog/Global_2...0..._small.jpg
http://static.flickr.com/48/146953893_89ff2e7ee4.jpg

....and more fun with VD Scotty, he
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.g...f55da4a9?hl=en
ahahaha... ahahahanson

On Jun 12, 2:33*pm, "hanson" wrote:
"V for Vendicar" m
wrote in . .. Here are the global average temperatures since 1958.
"o" = trend line.

Big ****ing whoop, VD Scotty. They knew that before
1958 and their trend line in much more impressive
then your own phony, silly & wrong graph. Look hehttp://www.jonco48.com/blog/Global_2...89ff2e7ee4.jpg

...and more fun with VD Scotty, hehttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.g...8910c3cf55da4a...
ahahaha... ahahahanson

Hey Nudd-case when are you gonna get with the "green" program?
"Global warming" ain't about CO2 levels. That is total bull****. But
for us oxygen-breathing animals, the destruction of rain forests for
the thinnest of reasons including unbridled greed is THE serious issue
and money-making "carbon credits" isn't any solution. So how long are
"we the people" going to allow the Banksters to keep stealing and
destroying large forests. Maybe once you are all gasping for breath
you'll start raising a little hell with them, Only then it may be too
late. Screw all that AGW crap, man is already doing enough nasty
things to the planet that we don't need Algore to be making up new
fake "threats".

"hanson" wrote in message
news:2_d4k.15236$3j2.453@trnddc03...
| "V for Vendicar" m
| wrote in message ...
| Here are the global average temperatures since 1958.
| "o" = trend line.
|
| Big ****ing whoop, VD Scotty. They knew that before
| 1958 and their trend line in much more impressive
| then your own phony, silly & wrong graph. Look he
| http://www.jonco48.com/blog/Global_2...0..._small.jpg
| http://static.flickr.com/48/146953893_89ff2e7ee4.jpg


I have a question.
Are the red pair hanging back to front or are arses getting smaller?


--
Androcles

Why did Einstein say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same?

1/2[tau(A)+tau(A')]= tau(B)
where
A = (0,0,0,t)
A' =(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v) +x'/(c+v))
B = (x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))
x' = x-vt

Ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img22.gif

"Easy: he did NOT say that." - cretin
According to moron van lintel, Einstein did not write the equation he wrote.

"Androcles" wrote in message
...

"hanson" wrote in message
news:2_d4k.15236$3j2.453@trnddc03...
| "V for Vendicar" m
| wrote in message ...
| Here are the global average temperatures since 1958.
| "o" = trend line.
|
| Big ****ing whoop, VD Scotty. They knew that before
| 1958 and their trend line in much more impressive
| then your own phony, silly & wrong graph. Look he
| http://www.jonco48.com/blog/Global_2...0..._small.jpg
| http://static.flickr.com/48/146953893_89ff2e7ee4.jpg

Androcles wrote:
I have a question.
Are the red pair hanging back to front or are arses getting smaller?

hanson worte:
ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA...dunno, but write a nice e-mail
to her and with some smooth green-talk by you she may
offer her arse to you. Let me know whether she turned green
or just grinned... ahahaha... Have fun & thanks for the laughs....
ahahahaha... ahahahasnon

--
Androcles

Why did Einstein say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same?

1/2[tau(A)+tau(A')]= tau(B)
where
A = (0,0,0,t)
A' =(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v) +x'/(c+v))
B = (x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))
x' = x-vt

Ref:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img22.gif

"Easy: he did NOT say that." - cretin
According to moron van lintel, Einstein did not write the equation he
wrote.

"Benj" wrote in message
...

Scott Nudds aka aka VD Scotty aka "V for Vendicar"
m
wrote in message:
...
Here are the global average temperatures since 1958.
"o" = trend line.

"hanson" wrote:
Big ****ing whoop, VD Scotty. They knew that before
1958 and their trend line in much more impressive
then your own phony, silly & wrong graph. Look he
http://www.jonco48.com/blog/Global_20Warning_20..._small.jpg
http://static.flickr.com/48/146953893_89ff2e7ee4.jpg

....and more fun with VD Scotty, he
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/88910c3cf55da4a
ahahaha... ahahahanson

Benj wrote to VD Scotty:
Hey Nudd-case when are you gonna get with the "green" program?
"Global warming" ain't about CO2 levels. That is total bull****. But
for us oxygen-breathing animals, the destruction of rain forests for
the thinnest of reasons including unbridled greed is THE serious issue
and money-making "carbon credits" isn't any solution. So how long are
"we the people" going to allow the Banksters to keep stealing and
destroying large forests. Maybe once you are all gasping for breath
you'll start raising a little hell with them, Only then it may be too
late. Screw all that AGW crap, man is already doing enough nasty
things to the planet that we don't need Algore to be making up new
fake "threats".

hanson wrote:
.... ahahahaha... Benj, you and me and the rest of the world
can preach our sermons to the little green idiots till their
doom-day, that never comes, and they still won't believe you.
Greenism is like any other religion, all of which are used by
the few to **** the many... It's very effective and lucrative... for
the few...( which is why all the 3 major monotheistic regions
are at each other throat... constantly).... and on the political
level look at this tread
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.environment/msg/f7e368c25cfd5bad?hl=en
and see how the little green idiots defend and (still) bark
daily after I posted it.... ahahaha... --- sci.enviro & alt. GW
are much better entertainment then is currently sci.chem &
sci. phys. Over there all fanatical enviros are damaged goods,
officially undiagnosed mental patients since they are PC
at the moment... Enjoy, Benj,.... ahahahaha... ahahanson

"Eeyore" wrote
Look at all those "o"'s lined up there. The trend is up, Up, UP.
No, no.
DOWN, DOWN.

Proving once again that AmeriKKKan KKKonservatives are too stupid to even
interpret a simple graph.



Here are the global average temperatures since 1958. "o" = trend line.

Look at all those "o"'s lined up there. The trend is up, Up, UP.

And most recently the rate of increase is about 2'C per century.

View with mono spaced font.

1958 14.08 *******o***************
1959 14.06 ********o************
1960 13.99 *********o******
1961 14.08 **********o************
1962 14.04 ***********o********
1963 14.08 ************o**********
1964 13.79 **===========o
1965 13.89 *********====o
1966 13.97 **************o
1967 14.00 ***************o*
1968 13.96 **************==o
1969 14.08 *****************o*****
1970 14.03 ******************o
1971 13.90 **********=========o
1972 14.00 *****************===o
1973 14.14 ********************o******
1974 13.92 ***********==========o
1975 13.95 *************=========o
1976 13.84 ******=================o
1977 14.13 ************************o*
1978 14.02 ******************=======o
1979 14.09 ***********************===o
1980 14.18 ***************************o**
1981 14.27 ****************************o*******
1982 14.05 ********************========o
1983 14.26 *****************************o*****
1984 14.09 ***********************=======o
1985 14.06 *********************==========o
1986 14.13 **************************======o
1987 14.27 *********************************o**
1988 14.31 **********************************o****
1989 14.19 ******************************=====o
1990 14.38 ************************************o*******
1991 14.35 ************************************o****
1992 14.12 *************************============o
1993 14.14 ****************************===========o
1994 14.24 **********************************=====o
1995 14.38 ****************************************o***
1996 14.30 **************************************===o
1997 14.40 ******************************************o**
1998 14.57 *******************************************o****** *******
1999 14.33 ****************************************===o
2000 14.33 ****************************************====o
2001 14.48 *********************************************o**** *
2002 14.56 **********************************************o*** ******
2003 14.55 ***********************************************o** *****
2004 14.49 ************************************************o* *
2005 14.62 *************************************************o **********
2006 14.54 ************************************************** o****
2007 14.57 ************************************************** *o*****
------------------------------------------- Temperature

Correlation Coefficient .8529209

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VMu14mBXAs