tvor wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On Jun 9, 11:21 am, "tvor" wrote:
[ . . . ]
Arctic temps accounts for the majority of the increase of the 'average'
global temperature. Dirty snow causes up to 94% of the observed arctic
temperature changes. Soot is the problem, not CO2.

What you describe is called the BC, (for Black Carbon,) effect
As you can see from these data, greenhouse gases dominate
this small effect.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/



I don't know Roj, this guy has a different opinion:

http://today.uci.edu/news/release_detail.asp?key=1621

Actually, no, he doesn't :

The Arctic is warming about twice as rapidly as the rest of Earth. Black
carbon (BC) particles are an important short-lived pollutant that
explain a significant fraction of the observed Arctic warming. Most
Arctic BC comes from fuel-combustion not from open fires. Arctic climate
is very sensitive to the surface warming that BC causes. BC appears to
warm the Arctic more than any other agent *except CO2*. Reducing the
concentration of Arctic BC now will cool the planet more than a delayed
reduction."

http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20071018110919.pdf

Why do you feel you have to be dishonest to people who are orders of
magnitude more intelligent than you, and can easily see through your
lies and delusions and dishonesty. What do you expect to accomplish?

In the past two centuries, the Arctic has warmed about 1.6 degrees. Dirty
snow caused .5 to 1.5 degrees of warming, or up to 94 percent of the
observed change, the scientists determined.

"kT" wrote in message
...
tvor wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On Jun 9, 11:21 am, "tvor" wrote:
[ . . . ]
Arctic temps accounts for the majority of the increase of the 'average'
global temperature. Dirty snow causes up to 94% of the observed arctic
temperature changes. Soot is the problem, not CO2.

What you describe is called the BC, (for Black Carbon,) effect
As you can see from these data, greenhouse gases dominate
this small effect.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/



I don't know Roj, this guy has a different opinion:

http://today.uci.edu/news/release_detail.asp?key=1621

Actually, no, he doesn't :

The Arctic is warming about twice as rapidly as the rest of Earth. Black
carbon (BC) particles are an important short-lived pollutant that explain
a significant fraction of the observed Arctic warming. Most Arctic BC
comes from fuel-combustion not from open fires. Arctic climate
is very sensitive to the surface warming that BC causes. BC appears to
warm the Arctic more than any other agent *except CO2*. Reducing the
concentration of Arctic BC now will cool the planet more than a delayed
reduction."

http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20071018110919.pdf

Why do you feel you have to be dishonest to people who are orders of
magnitude more intelligent than you, and can easily see through your lies
and delusions and dishonesty. What do you expect to accomplish?



"orders of magnitude more intelligent" hahahahahaa. Stick around, you
make me laugh!!!


In the past two centuries, the Arctic has warmed about 1.6 degrees. Dirty
snow caused .5 to 1.5 degrees of warming, or up to 94 percent of the
observed change, the scientists determined.

tvor wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On Jun 9, 11:21 am, "tvor" wrote:
[ . . . ]
Arctic temps accounts for the majority of the increase of the
'average' global temperature. Dirty snow causes up to 94% of the
observed arctic temperature changes. Soot is the problem, not CO2.

What you describe is called the BC, (for Black Carbon,) effect
As you can see from these data, greenhouse gases dominate
this small effect.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/



I don't know Roj, this guy has a different opinion:

http://today.uci.edu/news/release_detail.asp?key=1621

In the past two centuries, the Arctic has warmed about 1.6 degrees.
Dirty snow caused .5 to 1.5 degrees of warming, or up to 94 percent
of the observed change, the scientists determined.

"Dirty snow has had a significant impact on climate warming since the
Industrial Revolution. In the past 200 years, the Earth has warmed about .8
degree Celsius. Zender, graduate student Mark Flanner, and their colleagues
calculated that dirty snow caused the Earth's temperature to rise .1 to .15
degree, or up to 19 percent of the total warming."

19%, but soot is the problem, not CO2? Whatever you're on, I want some!
lol

tvor wrote:
"kT" wrote in message
...
tvor wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On Jun 9, 11:21 am, "tvor" wrote:
[ . . . ]
Arctic temps accounts for the majority of the increase of the
'average' global temperature. Dirty snow causes up to 94% of the
observed arctic temperature changes. Soot is the problem, not CO2.

What you describe is called the BC, (for Black Carbon,) effect
As you can see from these data, greenhouse gases dominate
this small effect.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/



I don't know Roj, this guy has a different opinion:

http://today.uci.edu/news/release_detail.asp?key=1621

Actually, no, he doesn't :

The Arctic is warming about twice as rapidly as the rest of Earth.
Black carbon (BC) particles are an important short-lived pollutant
that explain a significant fraction of the observed Arctic warming.
Most Arctic BC comes from fuel-combustion not from open fires.
Arctic climate is very sensitive to the surface warming that BC causes.
BC appears
to warm the Arctic more than any other agent *except CO2*. Reducing
the concentration of Arctic BC now will cool the planet more than a
delayed reduction."

http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20071018110919.pdf

Why do you feel you have to be dishonest to people who are orders of
magnitude more intelligent than you, and can easily see through your
lies and delusions and dishonesty. What do you expect to accomplish?



"orders of magnitude more intelligent" hahahahahaa. Stick around,
you make me laugh!!!

So far, your record here is zero.

tvor wrote:
"kT" wrote in message
...
tvor wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On Jun 9, 11:21 am, "tvor" wrote:
[ . . . ]
Arctic temps accounts for the majority of the increase of the 'average'
global temperature. Dirty snow causes up to 94% of the observed arctic
temperature changes. Soot is the problem, not CO2.
What you describe is called the BC, (for Black Carbon,) effect
As you can see from these data, greenhouse gases dominate
this small effect.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/



I don't know Roj, this guy has a different opinion:

http://today.uci.edu/news/release_detail.asp?key=1621
Actually, no, he doesn't :

The Arctic is warming about twice as rapidly as the rest of Earth. Black
carbon (BC) particles are an important short-lived pollutant that explain
a significant fraction of the observed Arctic warming. Most Arctic BC
comes from fuel-combustion not from open fires. Arctic climate
is very sensitive to the surface warming that BC causes. BC appears to
warm the Arctic more than any other agent *except CO2*. Reducing the
concentration of Arctic BC now will cool the planet more than a delayed
reduction."

http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20071018110919.pdf

Why do you feel you have to be dishonest to people who are orders of
magnitude more intelligent than you, and can easily see through your lies
and delusions and dishonesty. What do you expect to accomplish?

"orders of magnitude more intelligent" hahahahahaa. Stick around, you
make me laugh!!!

That's an improvement over your lies and dishonesty.

kT wrote:
That should be good enough for any crackpot or Gomer.

So, you're pretty much covered...
--
): "I may make you feel, but I can't make you think"
(: Off the monitor, through the modem, nothing but net

Well Done wrote:

kT wrote:

That should be good enough for any crackpot or Gomer.

So, you're pretty much covered...

You Limbaugh listeners sure showed them scientists who's right and who's
wrong. I'm happy reality is how it outta be, and not how it really is.

"kT" wrote in message
...
Chimp Ears Obama Commie wrote:

NASA has confirmed that a developing natural climate pattern
will likely result in much colder temperatures, according to Marc
Shepherd, writing in the April 30 American Thinker.

Hahah hahah ahahahahaha ha haha stop ... please ... I'm getting
dumber.

So which are you laughing at?

James wrote:

Marc Shepherd, writing in the April 30 American Thinker.

Hahah hahah ahahahahaha ha haha stop ... please ... I'm getting dumber.

So which are you laughing at?

You James. At you, not with you.

"kT" wrote in message
...
James wrote:

Marc Shepherd, writing in the April 30 American Thinker.

Hahah hahah ahahahahaha ha haha stop ... please ... I'm getting
dumber.

So which are you laughing at?

You James. At you, not with you.

You got the wrong hillbilly you West VA redneck.