Despite often made fossil fool claims to the contrary,
satellite data show warming in this 21st century.
--------
Satellite Global Land Ocean Warming Rates So Far This Century
(January 2000 to May 2008)

RSS MSU LT 3.1 82.5N to 70S Lat. +0.7 +- 0.5 K/Century
UAH MSU LT 5.2 GLOBAL +1.1 +- 0.6 K/Century

Monthly satellite Lower Troposphere data show warming in this century.
--

Remote Sensing Systems data come from the column marked "-70/82.5" at:

http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...cean_v03_1.txt
--

University of Alabama Huntsville data come from the column marked
"GLOBAL" at:

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2

On Jun 14, 2:40 am, Roger Coppock wrote:
Despite often made fossil fool claims to the contrary,
satellite data show warming in this 21st century.
--------
Satellite Global Land Ocean Warming Rates So Far This Century
(January 2000 to May 2008)

RSS MSU LT 3.1 82.5N to 70S Lat. +0.7 +- 0.5 K/Century
UAH MSU LT 5.2 GLOBAL +1.1 +- 0.6 K/Century

Monthly satellite Lower Troposphere data show warming in this century.
--

Remote Sensing Systems data come from the column marked "-70/82.5" at:

http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS...
--

University of Alabama Huntsville data come from the column marked
"GLOBAL" at:

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2

CHERRYPICKER

On 14 Jun, 03:40, Roger Coppock wrote:
Despite often made fossil fool claims to the contrary,
satellite data show warming in this 21st century.
--------
Satellite Global Land Ocean Warming Rates So Far This Century
(January 2000 to May 2008)

RSS MSU LT 3.1 *82.5N to 70S Lat. * +0.7 +- 0.5 K/Century
UAH MSU LT 5.2 *GLOBAL * * * * * * *+1.1 +- 0.6 K/Century

Monthly satellite Lower Troposphere data show warming in this century.
--

Remote Sensing Systems data come from the column marked "-70/82.5" at:

http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS...
--

University of Alabama Huntsville data come from the column marked
"GLOBAL" at:

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2

Feb 2000 to Feb 2008 doesnt.

On Jun 14, 1:25*am, matt_sykes wrote:
On 14 Jun, 03:40, Roger Coppock wrote:

Despite often made fossil fool claims to the contrary,
satellite data show warming in this 21st century.
--------
Satellite Global Land Ocean Warming Rates So Far This Century
(January 2000 to May 2008)

RSS MSU LT 3.1 *82.5N to 70S Lat. * +0.7 +- 0.5 K/Century
UAH MSU LT 5.2 *GLOBAL * * * * * * *+1.1 +- 0.6 K/Century

Monthly satellite Lower Troposphere data show warming in this century.
--

Remote Sensing Systems data come from the column marked "-70/82.5" at:

http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS...
--

University of Alabama Huntsville data come from the column marked
"GLOBAL" at:

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2

Feb 2000 to Feb 2008 doesnt.

But only a cherrypicker would run those numbers.

On Jun 13, 9:26*pm, chemist wrote:
On Jun 14, 2:40 am, Roger Coppock wrote:

Despite often made fossil fool claims to the contrary,
satellite data show warming in this 21st century.
--------
Satellite Global Land Ocean Warming Rates So Far This Century
(January 2000 to May 2008)

RSS MSU LT 3.1 *82.5N to 70S Lat. * +0.7 +- 0.5 K/Century
UAH MSU LT 5.2 *GLOBAL * * * * * * *+1.1 +- 0.6 K/Century

Monthly satellite Lower Troposphere data show warming in this century.
--

Remote Sensing Systems data come from the column marked "-70/82.5" at:

http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS...
--

University of Alabama Huntsville data come from the column marked
"GLOBAL" at:

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2

CHERRYPICKER

I only ran these numbers because fossil fool
articles made the claim 'No warming this century."
I didn't pick them. I know that it takes about
three decades to make a climate trend, so I
wouldn't normally run these numbers.

On Jun 14, 1:25*am, matt_sykes wrote:
On 14 Jun, 03:40, Roger Coppock wrote:

Despite often made fossil fool claims to the contrary,
satellite data show warming in this 21st century.
--------
Satellite Global Land Ocean Warming Rates So Far This Century
(January 2000 to May 2008)

RSS MSU LT 3.1 *82.5N to 70S Lat. * +0.7 +- 0.5 K/Century
UAH MSU LT 5.2 *GLOBAL * * * * * * *+1.1 +- 0.6 K/Century

Monthly satellite Lower Troposphere data show warming in this century.
--

Remote Sensing Systems data come from the column marked "-70/82.5" at:

http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS...
--

University of Alabama Huntsville data come from the column marked
"GLOBAL" at:

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2

Feb 2000 to Feb 2008 doesnt.

Only a cherrypicker would run those numbers.
However, you are incorrect, this period shows warming too.

(February 2000 to February 2008)
RSS MSU LT 3.1 82.5N to 70S Lat. +1.1 +- 0.6 K/Century
UAH MSU LT 5.2 GLOBAL +1.5 +- 0.6 K/Century

On Jun 14, 11:18 am, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Jun 14, 1:25 am, matt_sykes wrote:



On 14 Jun, 03:40, Roger Coppock wrote:

Despite often made fossil fool claims to the contrary,
satellite data show warming in this 21st century.
--------
Satellite Global Land Ocean Warming Rates So Far This Century
(January 2000 to May 2008)

RSS MSU LT 3.1 82.5N to 70S Lat. +0.7 +- 0.5 K/Century
UAH MSU LT 5.2 GLOBAL +1.1 +- 0.6 K/Century

Monthly satellite Lower Troposphere data show warming in this century.
--

Remote Sensing Systems data come from the column marked "-70/82.5" at:

http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS...
--

University of Alabama Huntsville data come from the column marked
"GLOBAL" at:

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2

Feb 2000 to Feb 2008 doesnt.

Only a cherrypicker would run those numbers.
However, you are incorrect, this period shows warming too.

(February 2000 to February 2008)
RSS MSU LT 3.1 82.5N to 70S Lat. +1.1 +- 0.6 K/Century
UAH MSU LT 5.2 GLOBAL +1.5 +- 0.6 K/Century

You are still cherrypicking Roger

"chemist" wrote
CHERRYPICKER

In what way did roger Coppock cause the satellites to cherry pick the wrong
tempertures.

URAh MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN NN

"matt_sykes" wrote
Feb 2000 to Feb 2008 doesnt.

Poor stupid sykes. Still thinks that you a trend lin e of a dataset by
drawing a line between two end points and ignoring allof the data inbetwen

He is what we call a....

MMMMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNN NNNNN

"chemist" wrote
You are still cherrypicking Roger

In what way is Roger causing the satellite data to be cherry picked.

The non-chemist who isn't a chemist, Doesn't seem capable of elaborating
on his accusation.