V for Vendicar wrote:

"0ZBN0" wrote
The projections are based on results from computer models that involve
simplifications of real physical processes that are not fully
understood.

As are the models that are used to design the PC you are now using.

Complete rubbish.

But then simple facts and honesty aren't a strong point of yours, or indeed the
entire AGW lobby.

Graham

"0ZBN0" wrote
The projections are based on results from computer models that involve
simplifications of real physical processes that are not fully
understood.

V for Vendicar wrote:
As are the models that are used to design the PC you are now using.

"Eeyore" wrote
Complete rubbish.

There is NO equation in existance that completely describes the flow of
electrons through silicon.

The model that is used is incomplete in a multitude of ways, including but
not limited to the transition to the superconducing state in borosilicon
alloys.

In fact the entire area of superconductivity is based on incomplete
models. No general model of superconductivity exists.

Even when it comes to silicon switching states, there is no precise model
that predicts with precision the smallest transistor possible, since the
models don't include the effects of capacitive outflux pinch, and don't
include any of the magnetic effects of the current flow inside the
transistor at all.

But then Eeyore, you are ignorant about virtually everything aren't you.

Transistor design relies on no single model, but rather a host of
overlayed models - each of which is reasonably precise within a specific
area of application.

URAh MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN N
Eeyore.