Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:39:16 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by chemist : On Jun 18, 5:16*pm, "Ouroboros_Rex" wrote: 0ZNB0 wrote: Eric Creed 17 Jun 2008 http://www.cityviewmag.com/stories-t...er-perpetrated... GOOGLE "RECORD HEAT" and you will get 3,180,000 hits. Google "record cold" and you will get 5,110,000. * Could this get any more stupid? *lol Yes some of your responses a great deal more stupid than that. Stupider than using Google hits as scientific evidence, or thinking that either "record cold" or "record heat" is particularly relevant? No, I doubt that. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fwd: Greatest Hoax of the 21st Century! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Rationality Returning To Australian Media On AGW Hoax | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
AGW Is The Greatest Hoax Ever Perpetrated | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
AGW Is The Greatest Hoax Ever Perpetrated | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
AGW Is The Greatest Hoax Ever Perpetrated | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |