Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bhanwara" wrote in message ... On Jul 14, 2:15 pm, Uncle Ben wrote: Huh? How can CO2 increase evaporation of water? Tell me. The CO2 can cause a small warming. The small warming causes a small evaporation. The small evaporation causes a larger evaporation. Add a few more cycles and you have a large effect. ====================== If the same "small warming" came from a small fluctuation in water vapor itself, it can't trigger the same process -- well, because CO2 is, uh, CO2, and nothing else can trigger this amazing repeated feedback cycle. ======================== Ah-hah! Dedicated denier detected. About time we had some new meat. ======================= When properly utilized, this amazing feedback cycle can produce catastrophe starting from a very small amount of heat, as long as the source for the very small amount of heat was politically correct, i.e. CO2. ======================== What did you pay for your automatic strawman builder? It doesn't work very well; I think you got ripped off. ===================== Did I get the essense of this right? ====================== Of course not, nor did you intend to. Tendentious blather was your goal. In that, you succeeded. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 17, 7:21*pm, "f-newguy" wrote:
"Bhanwara" wrote in message ... On Jul 14, 2:15 pm, Uncle Ben wrote: Huh? How can CO2 increase evaporation of water? Tell me. The CO2 can cause a small warming. The small warming causes a small evaporation. The small evaporation causes a larger evaporation. Add a few more cycles and you have a large effect. ====================== If the same "small warming" came from a small fluctuation in water vapor itself, it can't trigger the same process -- well, because CO2 is, uh, CO2, and nothing else can trigger this amazing repeated feedback cycle. ======================== Ah-hah! *Dedicated denier detected. *About time we had some new meat. ======================= When properly utilized, this amazing feedback cycle can produce catastrophe starting from a very small amount of heat, as long as the source for the very small amount of heat was politically correct, i.e. CO2. ======================== What did you pay for your automatic strawman builder? *It doesn't work very well; I think you got ripped off. ===================== Did I get the essense of this right? ====================== Of course not, nor did you intend to. *Tendentious blather was your goal. In that, you succeeded. Phew, you got that I was being sarcastic! Congratulations. You are a jewel among Global Warmists. I have posted a whole new thread around this subject, titled "About Computer Models in Global Warming". Do feel free to wade in and use your sharp intellect to take it all apart. (Just repeating "lies", "lies" counts too, I believe, in the warmist world.) |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bhanwara" wrote in message ... On Jul 17, 7:21 pm, "f-newguy" wrote: "Bhanwara" wrote in message ... On Jul 14, 2:15 pm, Uncle Ben wrote: Huh? How can CO2 increase evaporation of water? Tell me. The CO2 can cause a small warming. The small warming causes a small evaporation. The small evaporation causes a larger evaporation. Add a few more cycles and you have a large effect. ====================== If the same "small warming" came from a small fluctuation in water vapor itself, it can't trigger the same process -- well, because CO2 is, uh, CO2, and nothing else can trigger this amazing repeated feedback cycle. ======================== Ah-hah! Dedicated denier detected. About time we had some new meat. ======================= When properly utilized, this amazing feedback cycle can produce catastrophe starting from a very small amount of heat, as long as the source for the very small amount of heat was politically correct, i.e. CO2. ======================== What did you pay for your automatic strawman builder? It doesn't work very well; I think you got ripped off. ===================== Did I get the essense of this right? ====================== Of course not, nor did you intend to. Tendentious blather was your goal. In that, you succeeded. Phew, you got that I was being sarcastic! Congratulations. You are a jewel among Global Warmists. Ah, I see: just kidding! You don't really mean it. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Greenhouse Effect Is A Myth | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
The Greenhouse Effect Is A Myth | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Question: Antarctic ozone hole and greenhouse effect | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Greenhouse effect? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Greenhouse effect brigade, cup a load of this | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |