Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
0ZB0N wrote:
July 17, 2008 So not only is the "feedback effect" totaly imaginary (a "what if" modeling game), it is also totally illogical. There is no way it can be valid. The only thing totally imaginary here is any semblance of your intellect. What tripe. -- Message posted via NatScience.com http://www.natscience.com/Uwe/Forums...ology/200807/1 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Global warmists rely on anecdotal stories to sell their theories | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Inhofe's *BOGUS* list of '700 scientists' | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Inhofe's *BOGUS* list of '700 scientists' | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
The Bogus CO2 Runaway Models Of Global Warmists | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
How much CO2 required for runaway greenhouse effecf? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |