"Mauried" wrote
And on this topic, just how many people on this NG actually understand
what emissions trading is .

Well, when it comes to the Denialits, it's clear that many of them don't
even know what their own names are.

Such is their level of ignorance.

Although they aren't quite as stupid as the War Criminal Crack Head that
currently occupies the White House.

"Mauried" wrote
An analogy would a almost empty glass of water into which you add a
few drops of addirional water with a eye dropper and then claim we
have a huge amount of water in the glass.

The dilution ratio is such that it would be closer to adding a drop of
food coloring into a glass of water and then
claiming that the change in color (CO2 is a pigment), can not alter the
temperature of the water when exposed to sunlight.

Even children know that such a statement is false. Yet the Global Warming
Denialists continue to repeat their false claims that even a child knows if
false.

LOSERS..

AAHAHAHAHAHAHA

"Mauried" wrote
For example, if the entire world stopped all CO2 emitting tomorrow
what would happen to the current CO2 density in the atmosphere .
Whats the mechanism that reduces it back to 100 year ago levels
and how long will it take.

The decline to the levels of 100 years ago would occur at a rate such that
the half life of the difference would be the order of 200 years.

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:26:31 -0400, "V for Vendicar"
m wrote:


"Mauried" wrote
An analogy would a almost empty glass of water into which you add a
few drops of addirional water with a eye dropper and then claim we
have a huge amount of water in the glass.

The dilution ratio is such that it would be closer to adding a drop of
food coloring into a glass of water and then
claiming that the change in color (CO2 is a pigment), can not alter the
temperature of the water when exposed to sunlight.

Even children know that such a statement is false. Yet the Global Warming
Denialists continue to repeat their false claims that even a child knows if
false.

LOSERS..

AAHAHAHAHAHAHA




Show me the proof that Emissions Trading fixes Global Warming.

"Mauried" wrote
Show me the proof that Emissions Trading fixes Global Warming.

Show me the proof that your plan to sit on your Fat, Lazy, Immoral, ass
and do nothing will.

URAh MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN

On Jul 24, 2:28*pm, "V for Vendicar"
m wrote:
"Mauried" wrote

For example, if the entire world stopped all CO2 emitting tomorrow
what would happen to the current CO2 density in the atmosphere .
Whats the mechanism that reduces it back to 100 year ago levels
and how long will it take.

* The decline to the levels of 100 years ago would occur at a rate such that
the half life of the difference would be *the order of 200 years.



More bull**** lies from the anti-American, KKKommie, DhimmiKKK-rat,
dip****, dillusional, dumbass, dickhead, dope
Vendicar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


MMMMMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOONNNN NNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On Jul 24, 3:02*pm, "V for Vendicar"
m wrote:
"Mauried" wrote

Show me the proof that Emissions Trading fixes Global Warming.

* Show me the proof that your plan to sit on your Fat, Lazy, Immoral, ass
and do nothing will.



Didnt think you could, thanks for clarifying the fact that your
talking out your ass.


URAh
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!

"Steve Thomas" wrote
More bull**** lies from the anti-American, KKKommie, DhimmiKKK-rat,
dip****, dillusional, dumbass, dickhead, dope
Vendicar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


The Lifetime of Excess Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide

Berrien Moore III

Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New
Hampshire, Durham




B. H. Braswell

Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New
Hampshire, Durham




Abstract
We explore the effects of a changing terrestrial biosphere on the
atmospheric residence time of CO2 using three simple ocean carbon cycle
models and a model of global terrestrial carbon cycling. We find differences
in model behavior associated with the assumption of an active terrestrial
biosphere (forest regrowth) and significant differences if we assume a
donor-dependent flux from the atmosphere to the terrestrial component (e.g.,
a hypothetical terrestrial fertilization flux). To avoid numerical
difficulties associated with treating the atmospheric CO2 decay (relaxation)
curve as being well approximated by a weighted sum of exponential functions,
we define the single half-life as the time it takes for a model atmosphere
to relax from its present-day value half way to its equilibrium pCO2 value.
This scenario-based approach also avoids the use of unit pulse (Dirac Delta)
functions which can prove troublesome or unrealistic in the context of a
terrestrial fertilization assumption. We also discuss some of the numerical
problems associated with a conventional lifetime calculation which is based
on an exponential model. We connect our analysis of the residence time of
CO2 and the concept of single half-life to the residence time calculations
which are based on using weighted sums of exponentials. We note that the
single half-life concept focuses upon the early decline of CO2 under a
cutoff/decay scenario. If one assumes a terrestrial biosphere with a
fertilization flux, then our best estimate is that the single half-life for
excess CO2 lies within the range of 19 to 49 years, with a reasonable
average being 31 years. If we assume only regrowth, then the average value
for the single half-life for excess CO2 increases to 72 years, and if we
remove the terrestrial component completely, then it increases further to 92
years.

Received 17 February 1993; accepted 1 December 1993.

On Jul 24, 3:02 pm, "V for Vendicar"
m wrote:
"Mauried" wrote

Show me the proof that Emissions Trading fixes Global Warming.

Show me the proof that your plan to sit on your Fat, Lazy, Immoral, ass
and do nothing will.



"Steve Thomas" wrote
Didnt think you could, thanks for clarifying the fact that your
talking out your ass.

Poor Steve. Scientifically illiterate to the very end.