On Jul 20, 5:47*pm, "ZB00N" wrote:
"Trygve Lillefosse" wrote in message

...





On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:41:33 +1000, "0ZB0N" wrote:

"Trygve Lillefosse" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:19:38 GMT, (Mauried)
wrote:

Im simply tryin g to point out the bleeding obvious which is that
any
measures to combat AGW only work if every country implements them.
And thats NOT the case.
No one on this NG has come up with any solution as to how to get
countries like China , India and Russia to cut their emissions.
Im eagerly awaiting any suggestions.

To do that, one would have to tax imports from those countries that
does not tax their coal use/carbon emmisions.

If the message is - either you tax it or we tax it - I think that
they
would start taxing coal and/or emmisions.

ROTFLMAO

To paraphrase ...
Either you commit economic suicide or we'll do it for you!!!
Typical agenda-driven socialist drivel.

I think you are underestemating how economics are working, and how
fast usage patterns can change.

Would you buy stuff from your neighbour if the production process
involved polluting your groundwater?

--

Of course not.
But CO2 is not a pollutant, it is a trace gas essential for all life on
earth.
Only an agenda-driven socialist whacko would call it a pollutant!.
--

Warmest Regards

Bonzo

"The question scientists should now be asking is not how much it will
warm over the next 50 to 100 years, but why has it warmed so little
during the major carbon dioxide buildup?" Patrick J. Michaels,
Environmental Scientist , University of Virginia- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

breathe in bush's farts you idiot

On Jul 21, 11:27*am, wrote:


snip


Of course not.
But CO2 is not a pollutant, it is a trace gas essential for all life on
earth.
Only an agenda-driven socialist whacko would call it a pollutant!.
--


snip

breathe in bush's farts you idiot

Of course, the Bonzo troll deliberately overlooks the fact that CO2 is
both a trace gas essential to life as we know it *and* a pollutant at
certain concentrations. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Were it indeed the case that only 'agenda-driven socialist whackos'
would point this out, then this would be a very poor commentary on the
state of scientific knowledge.

As it happens, the Bonzo-troll is wrong, as usual. In some
concentrations, CO2 is of no marginal value to life. In higher
concentrations, it is involved in climate forcing and can disrupt
patterns of vegetation and the composition of the seas. At about 1000
ppmv, people start to become uncomfortable. At 5000ppmv people can
become comatose and die.

Bonzo is an example of someone recklessly spreading disinformation for
purposes that remain obscure.

Fran

On Jul 20, 10:52*pm, Fran wrote:
On Jul 21, 11:27*am, wrote:

snip

Of course not.
But CO2 is not a pollutant, it is a trace gas essential for all life on
earth.
Only an agenda-driven socialist whacko would call it a pollutant!.
--

snip

breathe in bush's farts you idiot

Of course, the Bonzo troll deliberately overlooks the fact that CO2 is
both a trace gas essential to life as we know it *and* a pollutant at
certain concentrations. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Were it indeed the case that only 'agenda-driven socialist whackos'
would point this out, then this would be a very poor commentary on the
state of scientific knowledge.

As it happens, the Bonzo-troll is wrong, as usual. In some
concentrations, CO2 is of no marginal value to life. In higher
concentrations, it is involved in climate forcing and can disrupt
patterns of vegetation and the composition of the seas. At about 1000
ppmv, people start to become uncomfortable. At 5000ppmv people can
become comatose and die.

Bonzo is an example of someone recklessly spreading disinformation for
purposes that remain obscure.

Fran

Could he be breathing too high a concentration of CO2, maybe?

On Jul 22, 10:14*am, wrote:
On Jul 20, 10:52*pm, Fran wrote:





On Jul 21, 11:27*am, wrote:

snip

Of course not.
But CO2 is not a pollutant, it is a trace gas essential for all life on
earth.
Only an agenda-driven socialist whacko would call it a pollutant!.
--

snip

breathe in bush's farts you idiot

Of course, the Bonzo troll deliberately overlooks the fact that CO2 is
both a trace gas essential to life as we know it *and* a pollutant at
certain concentrations. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Were it indeed the case that only 'agenda-driven socialist whackos'
would point this out, then this would be a very poor commentary on the
state of scientific knowledge.

As it happens, the Bonzo-troll is wrong, as usual. In some
concentrations, CO2 is of no marginal value to life. In higher
concentrations, it is involved in climate forcing and can disrupt
patterns of vegetation and the composition of the seas. At about 1000
ppmv, people start to become uncomfortable. At 5000ppmv people can
become comatose and die.

Bonzo is an example of someone recklessly spreading disinformation for
purposes that remain obscure.

Fran

Could he be breathing too high a concentration of CO2, maybe?

It would be irresponsible to suggest that breathing elevated CO2 was
addictive, but in Bonzo's case, the anecdotal data points that way.

Fran

On Jul 21, 9:41*pm, Fran wrote:
On Jul 22, 10:14*am, wrote:





On Jul 20, 10:52*pm, Fran wrote:

On Jul 21, 11:27*am, wrote:

snip

Of course not.
But CO2 is not a pollutant, it is a trace gas essential for all life on
earth.
Only an agenda-driven socialist whacko would call it a pollutant!..
--

snip

breathe in bush's farts you idiot

Of course, the Bonzo troll deliberately overlooks the fact that CO2 is
both a trace gas essential to life as we know it *and* a pollutant at
certain concentrations. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Were it indeed the case that only 'agenda-driven socialist whackos'
would point this out, then this would be a very poor commentary on the
state of scientific knowledge.

As it happens, the Bonzo-troll is wrong, as usual. In some
concentrations, CO2 is of no marginal value to life. In higher
concentrations, it is involved in climate forcing and can disrupt
patterns of vegetation and the composition of the seas. At about 1000
ppmv, people start to become uncomfortable. At 5000ppmv people can
become comatose and die.

Bonzo is an example of someone recklessly spreading disinformation for
purposes that remain obscure.

Fran

Could he be breathing too high a concentration of CO2, maybe?

It would be irresponsible to suggest that breathing elevated CO2 was
addictive, but in Bonzo's case, the anecdotal data points that way.

Fran- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Think it will be fatal? Or only to his brain?

On Jul 23, 1:36*pm, wrote:
On Jul 21, 9:41*pm, Fran wrote:





On Jul 22, 10:14*am, wrote:

On Jul 20, 10:52*pm, Fran wrote:

On Jul 21, 11:27*am, wrote:

snip

Of course not.
But CO2 is not a pollutant, it is a trace gas essential for all life on
earth.
Only an agenda-driven socialist whacko would call it a pollutant!.
--

snip

breathe in bush's farts you idiot

Of course, the Bonzo troll deliberately overlooks the fact that CO2 is
both a trace gas essential to life as we know it *and* a pollutant at
certain concentrations. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Were it indeed the case that only 'agenda-driven socialist whackos'
would point this out, then this would be a very poor commentary on the
state of scientific knowledge.

As it happens, the Bonzo-troll is wrong, as usual. In some
concentrations, CO2 is of no marginal value to life. In higher
concentrations, it is involved in climate forcing and can disrupt
patterns of vegetation and the composition of the seas. At about 1000
ppmv, people start to become uncomfortable. At 5000ppmv people can
become comatose and die.

Bonzo is an example of someone recklessly spreading disinformation for
purposes that remain obscure.

Fran

Could he be breathing too high a concentration of CO2, maybe?

It would be irresponsible to suggest that breathing elevated CO2 was
addictive, but in Bonzo's case, the anecdotal data points that way.

Think it will be fatal? *

Not in his case.

Or only to his brain?

Perhaps, but in his case, the brain is purely vestigial.

Fran