June is tied for 10th warmest on NASA's 129-year Northern land record.

Lately, fossil fools on this newsgroup have invented their
own fantasy physics. The following references are helpful
for those who want to know how things behave in the real
world.

An overview of Greenhouse gas theory from the
University of Chicago.
http://forecast.uchicago.edu/archer....ouse_gases.pdf

Basic global greenhouse gas physics from MIT.
http://www-paoc.mit.edu/labweb/notes/chap2.pdf

I wonder if misters Chemist, Bedo, and Dunderbar are
not too full of themselves to read a basic textbook?
The first reference, Archer's textbook, is for people
who aren't science students, which includes you three.

Despite fossil fool lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.

These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA,
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt
They represent the results of tens of millions of readings
taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern
Hemisphere over the last 129 years. Yes, the data are corrected
for the urban heat island effect.

The Mean June temperature over the last 129 years is 14.033 C.
The Variance is 0.10958.
The Standard Deviation is 0.3310.

Rxy 0.763655 Rxy^2 0.583169
TEMP = 13.592083 + (0.006788 * (YEAR-1879))
Degrees of Freedom = 127 F = 177.679765
Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately
0.9999999999999999999999999 (25 nines), which is darn close to 100%!

The month of June in the year 2008,
is linearly projected to be 14.468,
yet it was 14.61. - above projected
The sum of the residuals is 22.201923

Equal weight exponential least squares fit:
TEMP = 13.597633 * e^(.0004845 * (YEAR-1879))
The sum of the residuals is 22.13287

Rank of the months of June
Year Temp C Anomaly Z score
2005 14.96 0.927 2.80
2006 14.93 0.897 2.71
1998 14.85 0.817 2.47
2007 14.79 0.757 2.29
2002 14.76 0.727 2.20
1995 14.65 0.617 1.86
2001 14.64 0.607 1.83
2003 14.63 0.597 1.80
1990 14.63 0.597 1.80
2008 14.61 0.577 1.74 --
2004 14.61 0.577 1.74
1991 14.55 0.517 1.56
2000 14.53 0.497 1.50
MEAN 14.033 0.000 0.00
1917 13.65 -0.383 -1.16
1886 13.65 -0.383 -1.16
1902 13.63 -0.403 -1.22
1894 13.62 -0.413 -1.25
1918 13.60 -0.433 -1.31
1882 13.59 -0.443 -1.34
1888 13.57 -0.463 -1.40
1913 13.53 -0.503 -1.52
1903 13.49 -0.543 -1.64
1907 13.48 -0.553 -1.67
1904 13.47 -0.563 -1.70
1885 13.43 -0.603 -1.82
1881 13.32 -0.713 -2.15
1884 13.28 -0.753 -2.28

The most recent 175 continuous months, or 14 years and 7 months,
on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980
data set norm of 14 C.
There are 1542 months of data on this data set:
-- 792 of them are at or above the norm.
-- 750 of them are below the norm.
This run of 175 months above the norm is the result of a warming
world. It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level
of confidence. A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or
meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years,
otherwise expect it to continue.

Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
Roger Coppock wrote:

June is tied for 10th warmest on NASA's 129-year Northern land
record.

Lately, fossil fools on this newsgroup have invented their
own fantasy physics. The following references are helpful
for those who want to know how things behave in the real
world.

An overview of Greenhouse gas theory from the
University of Chicago.
http://forecast.uchicago.edu/archer....ouse_gases.pdf

Basic global greenhouse gas physics from MIT.
http://www-paoc.mit.edu/labweb/notes/chap2.pdf

I wonder if misters Chemist, Bedo, and Dunderbar are
not too full of themselves to read a basic textbook?
The first reference, Archer's textbook, is for people
who aren't science students, which includes you three.

Despite fossil fool lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.

These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA,
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt

Invalid data, invalid results.

Poor petey, he lies, and lies, and lies, and lies...

Hey, lil' Nazi, tell us again how we all shouold be 'gunned down at this
moment'. lol

Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
"Ouroboros_Rex" wrote:

Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
Roger Coppock wrote:

June is tied for 10th warmest on NASA's 129-year Northern land
record.

Lately, fossil fools on this newsgroup have invented their
own fantasy physics. The following references are helpful
for those who want to know how things behave in the real
world.

An overview of Greenhouse gas theory from the
University of Chicago.
http://forecast.uchicago.edu/archer....ouse_gases.pdf

Basic global greenhouse gas physics from MIT.
http://www-paoc.mit.edu/labweb/notes/chap2.pdf

I wonder if misters Chemist, Bedo, and Dunderbar are
not too full of themselves to read a basic textbook?
The first reference, Archer's textbook, is for people
who aren't science students, which includes you three.

Despite fossil fool lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.

These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA,
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt

Invalid data, invalid results.

Poor petey, he lies, and lies, and lies, and lies...

Hey, lil' Nazi, tell us again how we all shouold be 'gunned down
at this moment'. lol

Say good bye to your account.

ROFLMAO

Let's hope not, lil' Nazi! These people might not like your advocacy of
wholesale murder with their name on it.

http://www.frankenexpress.de/wcms/

"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
June is tied for 10th warmest on NASA's 129-year Northern land record.

Lately, fossil fools on this newsgroup have invented their
own fantasy physics. The following references are helpful
for those who want to know how things behave in the real
world.

ROTFL

Roger: "Hi. I'm Roger. I am a scientist. I am much smarter than you.
Scientists have made many discoveries and invented many wonderful
things."

James: "But those were other scientists. Not you."

Roger: "You don't know much about science, do you?"

LOL

James wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
June is tied for 10th warmest on NASA's 129-year Northern land
record. Lately, fossil fools on this newsgroup have invented their
own fantasy physics. The following references are helpful
for those who want to know how things behave in the real
world.

ROTFL

Roger: "Hi. I'm Roger. I am a scientist. I am much smarter than you.
Scientists have made many discoveries and invented many wonderful
things."

James: "But those were other scientists. Not you."

Roger: "You don't know much about science, do you?"

LOL

Poor James is once again reduced to contentless blather by the facts.

"Roger Coppock" wrote
June is tied for 10th warmest on NASA's 129-year Northern land record.

NOAA: Eighth Warmest June On Record For Globe

ScienceDaily (July 21, 2008) - The combined average global land and ocean
surface temperatures for June 2008 ranked eighth warmest for June since
worldwide records began in 1880, according to an analysis by NOAA's National
Climatic Data Center in Asheville, N.C. Also, globally it was the ninth
warmest
January - June period on record.


MLA National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration (2008, July 21). NOAA:
Eighth Warmest June On Record For Globe.

"Peter Muehlbauer" wrote
Invalid data, invalid results.

NOAA: Eighth Warmest June On Record For Globe

ScienceDaily (July 21, 2008) - The combined average global land and ocean
surface temperatures for June 2008 ranked eighth warmest for June since
worldwide records began in 1880, according to an analysis by NOAA's National
Climatic Data Center in Asheville, N.C. Also, globally it was the ninth
warmest
January - June period on record.


MLA National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration (2008, July 21). NOAA:
Eighth Warmest June On Record For Globe.

"James" wrote
Roger: "Hi. I'm Roger. I am a scientist. I am much smarter than you.
Scientists have made many discoveries and invented many wonderful
things."

NOAA: Eighth Warmest June On Record For Globe

ScienceDaily (July 21, 2008) - The combined average global land and ocean
surface temperatures for June 2008 ranked eighth warmest for June since
worldwide records began in 1880, according to an analysis by NOAA's National
Climatic Data Center in Asheville, N.C. Also, globally it was the ninth
warmest
January - June period on record.


MLA National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration (2008, July 21). NOAA:
Eighth Warmest June On Record For Globe.

On Jul 21, 6:27*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
June is tied for 10th warmest on NASA's 129-year Northern land record.

Lately, fossil fools on this newsgroup have invented their
own fantasy physics. *The following references are helpful
for those who want to know how things behave in the real
world.

An overview of Greenhouse gas theory from the
University of Chicago.http://forecast.uchicago.edu/archer....ouse_gases.pdf

Basic global greenhouse gas physics from MIT.http://www-paoc.mit.edu/labweb/notes/chap2.pdf

I wonder if misters Chemist, Bedo, and Dunderbar are
not too full of themselves to read a basic textbook?
The first reference, Archer's textbook, is for people
who aren't science students, which includes you three.

Despite fossil fool lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.

These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA,http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt
They represent the results of tens of millions of readings
taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern
Hemisphere over the last 129 years. *Yes, the data are corrected
for the urban heat island effect.

The Mean June temperature over the last 129 years is 14.033 C.
The Variance is 0.10958.
The Standard Deviation is 0.3310.

Rxy 0.763655 * Rxy^2 0.583169
TEMP = 13.592083 + (0.006788 * (YEAR-1879))
Degrees of Freedom = 127 * * * * F = 177.679765
Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately
0.9999999999999999999999999 (25 nines), which is darn close to 100%!

The month of June in the year 2008,
is linearly projected to be 14.468,
* * * * * * * * *yet it was 14.61. - above projected
The sum of the residuals is 22.201923

Equal weight exponential least squares fit:
TEMP = 13.597633 * e^(.0004845 * (YEAR-1879))
The sum of the residuals is 22.13287

* Rank of the months of June
Year * Temp C * Anomaly * Z score
2005 * 14.96 * * 0.927 * * 2.80
2006 * 14.93 * * 0.897 * * 2.71
1998 * 14.85 * * 0.817 * * 2.47
2007 * 14.79 * * 0.757 * * 2.29
2002 * 14.76 * * 0.727 * * 2.20
1995 * 14.65 * * 0.617 * * 1.86
2001 * 14.64 * * 0.607 * * 1.83
2003 * 14.63 * * 0.597 * * 1.80
1990 * 14.63 * * 0.597 * * 1.80
2008 * 14.61 * * 0.577 * * 1.74 --
2004 * 14.61 * * 0.577 * * 1.74
1991 * 14.55 * * 0.517 * * 1.56
2000 * 14.53 * * 0.497 * * 1.50
MEAN * 14.033 * *0.000 * * 0.00
1917 * 13.65 * *-0.383 * *-1.16
1886 * 13.65 * *-0.383 * *-1.16
1902 * 13.63 * *-0.403 * *-1.22
1894 * 13.62 * *-0.413 * *-1.25
1918 * 13.60 * *-0.433 * *-1.31
1882 * 13.59 * *-0.443 * *-1.34
1888 * 13.57 * *-0.463 * *-1.40
1913 * 13.53 * *-0.503 * *-1.52
1903 * 13.49 * *-0.543 * *-1.64
1907 * 13.48 * *-0.553 * *-1.67
1904 * 13.47 * *-0.563 * *-1.70
1885 * 13.43 * *-0.603 * *-1.82
1881 * 13.32 * *-0.713 * *-2.15
1884 * 13.28 * *-0.753 * *-2.28

The most recent 175 continuous months, or 14 years and 7 months,
on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980
data set norm of 14 C.
There are 1542 months of data on this data set:
* -- 792 of them are at or above the norm.
* -- 750 of them are below the norm.
This run of 175 months above the norm is the result of a warming
world. *It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level
of confidence. *A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or
meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years,
otherwise expect it to continue.

thanks for the post roger

James wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
June is tied for 10th warmest on NASA's 129-year Northern land record.

Lately, fossil fools on this newsgroup have invented their
own fantasy physics. The following references are helpful
for those who want to know how things behave in the real
world.

ROTFL

Roger: "Hi. I'm Roger. I am a scientist. I am much smarter than you.
Scientists have made many discoveries and invented many wonderful
things."

James: "But those were other scientists. Not you."

Roger: "You don't know much about science, do you?"

LOL

Is Roger a scientist? He can't answer a simple question, much
less a question about his linear analysis of weather.

Cheers,

Rich