sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 08, 03:20 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,alt.energy.renewable,alt.politics.bush,alt.conspiracy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: May 2005
Posts: 1,360
Default Solar Cycle 24: Implications For The US

Bonzo repeats the big lie.

On Jul 21, 6:02*pm, "ZB0N0" wrote:
David Archibald

International Conference on Climate Change

March, 2008

QUOTE: Globally, we have had 10 years of temperature decline since that
peak in 1998, with a rate of decline of 0.06 degrees per annum. I am


It's a big lie, as often repeated as, "The German army was
never defeated in the field." Every fossil fool repeats it.
It's become their hallmark. If you are stupid enough to
believe this lie, then you're a fossil fool. Being totally
ignorant of introductory statistics is a sure fire ticket to
join this club of know nothings.

I am 88% sure that the global mean land and sea surface
temperature increased at 0.017K per year over the years
1998 to 2007. (88% confidence from only 10 points is the
indication of just how strong the warming trend has become!)

TEMP = -19.7225 + (0.01709 * YEAR)
Degrees of Freedom = 8 F = 2.9631
Confidence of nonzero correlation = 0.88
(To locate an explanation of this calculation see
the bottom of this article.)

This result, a current warming rate of 1.7K per century,
is entirely consistent with longer term trends which
show a steady increase in this rate of temperature rise
for more than the last 50 years. Please see:
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/Slope1952-2007.jpg
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/Slope1880-2007.jpg
--
The data are available in the column labeled "AnnMean" and "J-D" at
this URL:

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/ta...LB.Ts+dSST.txt

Year AnnMean
1998 14.57
1999 14.33
2000 14.33
2001 14.48
2002 14.56
2003 14.55
2004 14.48
2005 14.62
2006 14.54
2007 14.56
---
Those who are new to statistical regression will find a tutorial
on the subject in almost any introductory statistics text. The
information is also available on the net in many places, here for
example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_analysis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-test

Encyclopedia Britannica also has this information.

Those who lack either the math or the reference skills,
may simply graph the 10 points given above.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Solar Cycle 25 To End Man Made Climate Change Myth [email protected] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 3 May 23rd 09 07:09 PM
Day H??*10^3 - Solar activity is very low - "devastating implications of global hunger" Edmund Fitzgerald[_6_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 May 1st 09 01:16 PM
GW is not sunspots, solar cycle length, solar magnetic field, cosmic rays, or solar irradiance. Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 48 July 14th 07 08:04 AM
Fwd: Scientists Predict Big Solar Cycle Keith (Southend) uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 December 22nd 06 10:45 PM
"The next solar cycle is going to be a big one" Mike Tullett uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 6 December 22nd 06 10:18 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017