Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co..._the_us_1.html

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

On Dec 15, 10:53*am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2008/12/a_warming_hole_in_the_u...

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

I know that 1 month's temperature readings, in one region, don't
necessarily point to long-term trends in "climate."

But in light of recent Denier posts in this group concerning unusually
cold conditions in various places, I thought this passage from
Christainsen's post was worth noting:

"The NOAA officials also noted that November 2008 was 2.0 degrees
above normal for the contiguous U.S. and that this past month was the
warmest November on record in the western states. Much of that can be
attributed to the large, persistent upper-level ridge of high pressure
which covered the region during most of November."

"Warmest November on record" in the western US, and 2 degrees above
normal for the Lower 48.

Interesting ...

On Dec 15, 11:04*am, john fernbach wrote:
On Dec 15, 10:53*am, David wrote:

Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2008/12/a_warming_hole_in_the_u...

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

I know that 1 month's temperature readings, in one region, don't
necessarily point to long-term trends in "climate."

But in light of recent Denier posts in this group concerning unusually
cold conditions in various places, I thought this passage from
Christainsen's post was worth noting:

"The NOAA officials also noted that November 2008 was 2.0 degrees
above normal for the contiguous U.S. and that this past month was the
warmest November on record in the western states. Much of that can be
attributed to the large, persistent upper-level ridge of high pressure
which covered the region during most of November."

"Warmest November on record" in the western US, and 2 degrees above
normal for the Lower 48.

Interesting ...

More Alarmist Lies and Propaganda
Typical Leftist/Socialist

Catoni wrote:
On Dec 15, 11:04 am, john fernbach wrote:
On Dec 15, 10:53 am, David wrote:

Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2008/12/a_warming_hole_in_the_u...

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

I know that 1 month's temperature readings, in one region, don't
necessarily point to long-term trends in "climate."

But in light of recent Denier posts in this group concerning
unusually cold conditions in various places, I thought this passage
from Christainsen's post was worth noting:

"The NOAA officials also noted that November 2008 was 2.0 degrees
above normal for the contiguous U.S. and that this past month was the
warmest November on record in the western states. Much of that can be
attributed to the large, persistent upper-level ridge of high
pressure which covered the region during most of November."

"Warmest November on record" in the western US, and 2 degrees above
normal for the Lower 48.

Interesting ...

More Alarmist Lies and Propaganda
Typical Leftist/Socialist

translation: drooool

"marcodbeast" wrote:

Catoni wrote:
On Dec 15, 11:04 am, john fernbach wrote:
On Dec 15, 10:53 am, David wrote:

Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2008/12/a_warming_hole_in_the_u...

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

I know that 1 month's temperature readings, in one region, don't
necessarily point to long-term trends in "climate."

But in light of recent Denier posts in this group concerning
unusually cold conditions in various places, I thought this passage
from Christainsen's post was worth noting:

"The NOAA officials also noted that November 2008 was 2.0 degrees
above normal for the contiguous U.S. and that this past month was the
warmest November on record in the western states. Much of that can be
attributed to the large, persistent upper-level ridge of high
pressure which covered the region during most of November."

"Warmest November on record" in the western US, and 2 degrees above
normal for the Lower 48.

Interesting ...

More Alarmist Lies and Propaganda
Typical Leftist/Socialist

translation: drooool


Just so much ado about nothing, really, when the temperature range
for each day in November is between possibly 10 F and 70 F, what makes
the temperature accountants think all locations absolutely must sum to
some "average" to be normal.


The "air" is not tied to the ground, it is not all the same air every
day, climate study has departed from study to wishy-washy pouting over all
numbers not being perfect.


Talk to a geologist to get sane and rational opinions about this.

Whata Fool wrote:
"marcodbeast" wrote:

Catoni wrote:
On Dec 15, 11:04 am, john fernbach wrote:
On Dec 15, 10:53 am, David wrote:

Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2008/12/a_warming_hole_in_the_u...

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

I know that 1 month's temperature readings, in one region, don't
necessarily point to long-term trends in "climate."

But in light of recent Denier posts in this group concerning
unusually cold conditions in various places, I thought this passage
from Christainsen's post was worth noting:

"The NOAA officials also noted that November 2008 was 2.0 degrees
above normal for the contiguous U.S. and that this past month was
the warmest November on record in the western states. Much of that
can be attributed to the large, persistent upper-level ridge of
high pressure which covered the region during most of November."

"Warmest November on record" in the western US, and 2 degrees above
normal for the Lower 48.

Interesting ...

More Alarmist Lies and Propaganda
Typical Leftist/Socialist

translation: drooool


Just so much ado about nothing, really, when the temperature range
for each day in November is between possibly 10 F and 70 F, what
makes the temperature accountants think all locations absolutely must
sum to some "average" to be normal.


The "air" is not tied to the ground, it is not all the same air
every day, climate study has departed from study to wishy-washy
pouting over all numbers not being perfect.


Talk to a geologist to get sane and rational opinions about this.

An oil geologist, or a coal geologist? Ain't no climate geologists. lol

Which of these things is not like the others?

sci.geo.meteorology
sci.environment
alt.global-warming
soc.religion.quaker

Why is there a religion group among the science groups?

The reason that the quaker group is there is because the poster
who signs his posts "David Christainsen - Meteorologist" is trying
to destroy the Quaker newsgroup by flooding it with off-topic posts
about global warming. Why does he want to hurt the Quakers?
Because he was expelled from a Quaker meeting for being disruptive.

When you reply to the same newsgroups, letting David Christainsen
control where your posts go, you help him in his ongoing quest to
destroy soc.religion.quaker. If you delete s.r.q from the
"Newsgroups:" line, you will be doing the Quakers a huge favor.

....And no, he isn't really a Meteorologist. He belongs to no
meteorology organization, has no degree in meteorology, and
has never held a job in the field of meteorology. It appears
that his definition of "Meteorologist" is "someone who posts
to a meteorology newsgroup".

The Quakers thank thee in advance for thy kindness to them.

"...The unarmed Quakers in Pennsylvania were safe
from attack by Indians for sixty years while in all
the other colonies armed whites suffered massacres.
Then one day a couple of Quakers, a little afraid
and influenced by the example of other white men,
took guns with them to their work some distance from
the cabin. The Indians concluded that the Quakers
must be contemplating an attack on them, decided
that the best defense was an offensive, and promptly
killed the Quakers."

-A. J. Muste, _Non-Violence in an Aggressive World_

On Dec 17, 7:17*am, Engineer wrote:
Which of these things is not like the others?

sci.geo.meteorology
sci.environment
alt.global-warming
soc.religion.quaker

Why is there a religion group among the science groups?

The reason that the quaker group is there is because the poster
who signs his posts "David Christainsen - Meteorologist" is trying
to destroy the Quaker newsgroup by flooding it with off-topic posts
about global warming. *Why does he want to hurt the Quakers? *
Because he was expelled from a Quaker meeting for being disruptive.

When you reply to the same newsgroups, letting David Christainsen
control where your posts go, you help him in his ongoing quest to
destroy soc.religion.quaker. *If you delete s.r.q from the
"Newsgroups:" line, you will be doing the Quakers a huge favor.

...And no, he isn't really a Meteorologist. *He belongs to no
meteorology organization, has no degree in meteorology, and
has never held a job in the field of meteorology. *It appears
that his definition of "Meteorologist" is "someone who posts
to a meteorology newsgroup".
...

There is NO FLOOD.

Possibly because Engineer (Guy Macon) is NOT a
Friend, he does not understand that Friends believe
in stewardship of the earth.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist