Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...ns_actual.html

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

David wrote:
Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...ns_actual.html

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

I hear you aren't actually a meteorologist. And why are you
crossposting to quaker?

Bill Carter wrote:

David wrote:

Accuweather

http://[deleted].com/climate_cha...ns_actual.html

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

I hear you aren't actually a meteorologist. And why are you
crossposting to quaker?

It is true that he isn't really a Meteorologist. He belongs
to no meteorology organization, has no degree in meteorology,
and has never held a job in the field of meteorology.

It appears that his definition of "Meteorologist" is "someone
who posts to a meteorology newsgroup".

The reason he keeps adding the quaker group to the newsgroups
line is because he is trying to destroy the Quaker newsgroup
by flooding it with off-topic posts about global warming.
Why does he want to hurt the Quakers? Because he was expelled
from a Quaker meeting for being disruptive in much the same way
he is disruptive online.

When you reply to the same newsgroups, letting David Christainsen
control where your posts go, you help him in his ongoing quest to
destroy soc.religion.quaker. If you delete s.r.q from the
"Newsgroups:" line, you will be doing the Quakers a huge favor.

I would encourage everyone here to follow the fine example of
Bill Carter and to remove soc.religion.quaker from the newsgroups
line when replying to this fake meteorologist. Better yet would
be posting only to newsgroups that you yourself read rather than
letting a well-known net-kook control where your posts go like
some puppet on a string.

The Quakers thank thee in advance for thy kindness to them
in not assisting David's attempt to flood the Quaker newsgroup.

"...The unarmed Quakers in Pennsylvania were safe
from attack by Indians for sixty years while in all
the other colonies armed whites suffered massacres.
Then one day a couple of Quakers, a little afraid
and influenced by the example of other white men,
took guns with them to their work some distance from
the cabin. The Indians concluded that the Quakers
must be contemplating an attack on them, decided
that the best defense was an offensive, and promptly
killed the Quakers."

-A. J. Muste, _Non-Violence in an Aggressive World_

On Dec 18, 8:25*am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2008/12/climate_change_concerns...

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

Scientists way back were also fearful of falling off the edge of the
flat disc that was the Earth. We know better now.