Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co..._likely_1.html

The reader should investigate Dr. Svensmark's
response on his/her own.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

On 12/29/08 9:56 AM, in article
, "David"
wrote:

Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co..._rays_likely_1.
html

The reader should investigate Dr. Svensmark's
response on his/her own.

** cosmic rays are still much of a mystery to our climate scientists. They
come from different directions all over the cosmos. While satellites are
helping, our hopes are in an huge lab being built in Switzerland just for
studying cosmic rays.

** Conversely Solar radiation is the key to global
climate and orbital changes are the governing
factors.

As for atmospheric CO2 it is a trivial item in
the GHG and appears to be even less important,
5 years ago atmospheric CO2 was reported @
400 ppm. Now it is at 385 ppm dropping @ 3
ppm per year. It doesn't seem like much until
you note that in 100 years atmospheric CO2
increased by 1 ppm per annum. Don't jerkoff
on the hockey stick, I saw the real graph~~
it was as spikey as it is possible to get.

On Dec 29, 12:38 pm, "
wrote:
On 12/29/08 9:56 AM, in article
, "David"

wrote:
Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...n_cosmic_rays_....
html

The reader should investigate Dr. Svensmark's
response on his/her own.

** cosmic rays are still much of a mystery to our climate scientists. They
come from different directions all over the cosmos. While satellites are
helping, our hopes are in an huge lab being built in Switzerland just for
studying cosmic rays.

** Conversely Solar radiation is the key to global
climate and orbital changes are the governing
factors.

As for atmospheric CO2 it is a trivial item in
the GHG and appears to be even less important,
5 years ago atmospheric CO2 was reported @
400 ppm. Now it is at 385 ppm dropping @ 3
ppm per year. It doesn't seem like much until
you note that in 100 years atmospheric CO2
increased by 1 ppm per annum. Don't jerkoff
on the hockey stick, I saw the real graph~~
it was as spikey as it is possible to get.
"5 years ago atmospheric CO2 was reported @
400 ppm. Now it is at 385 ppm dropping @ 3
ppm per year."

WRONG

WRONG

WRONG

WRONG

WRONG

WRONG

wrote in message
...



On 12/29/08 9:56 AM, in article
, "David"
wrote:

Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co..._rays_likely_1.
html

The reader should investigate Dr. Svensmark's
response on his/her own.

** cosmic rays are still much of a mystery to our climate scientists. They
come from different directions all over the cosmos. While satellites are
helping, our hopes are in an huge lab being built in Switzerland just for
studying cosmic rays.

** Conversely Solar radiation is the key to global
climate and orbital changes are the governing
factors.

As for atmospheric CO2 it is a trivial item in
the GHG and appears to be even less important,
5 years ago atmospheric CO2 was reported @
400 ppm. Now it is at 385 ppm dropping @ 3
ppm per year. It doesn't seem like much until
you note that in 100 years atmospheric CO2
increased by 1 ppm per annum. Don't jerkoff
on the hockey stick, I saw the real graph~~
it was as spikey as it is possible to get.


Amazing, an idiot, a liar and a conspiracy theorist all in one stunted
little body. You may just have made medical history.