On Jan 15, 1:23*pm, "obzon" wrote:
"Fran" wrote in message

...
On Jan 15, 11:38 am, "obzon" wrote:



"Fran" wrote in message

....

Barnaby Joyce, speaking of the anthropogenic climate change hypothesis
on ABC radio yesterday:

"I become sceptical when religious fervour builds up around an issue"

Barnaby describes himself as a "born again" Christian. He's not
sceptical when hew should be and "sceptical" when there's no good
basis for it.

CORRECTION:
He's sceptical when he should be and not sceptical when there's no good
basis for it.

So there's no good basis for being sceptical of christianity? It's all
sound and ratiopnal is it?
********************************************

There is far, far more basis for being skeptical of the rabid socialist
whackos pushing the AGW scam.


Answer the question: Is there a basis for being sceptical of the
claims of Christianity. Is the religious fervour associated with
christainity a reasonable basis for acting?


********************************************** There is very good reason to be skeptical of the AGW scam!!
The fact that it's being pushed almost entirely by rabid socialist whackos
should be reason enough.

You need to get in touch with James or the folks at naysayer central
who are claiming that leftists who support AGW have been co-opted by
corporate capitalist interest.
*************************************************

The rabid socialist whackos pushing the AGW scam are doing it to further
their, historically, woeful attempts at enslaving the masses.
The capitalists are hopping onto the bandwagon because they see massive
profits for themselves in this scam.


This is not what was being claimed. It was claimed that capitalist
were enlisting socialists and liberals into their corporate schemes,
not the toher way about. How could the expropriation of capitalists
lead to "more profits" for them? They wouldn't have assets.

I see no conflict here!

But that's because you have no powers of reasoning. All you can do is
regurgitate the latest nonsense.

Fran