On Jan 15, 3:34*pm, "obzon" wrote:
"Fran" wrote in message

...





On Jan 15, 2:45 pm, "obzon" wrote:
"Fran" wrote in message

....

On Jan 15, 1:23 pm, "obzon" wrote:
"Fran" wrote in message

...
On Jan 15, 11:38 am, "obzon" wrote:

"Fran" wrote in message

...

Barnaby Joyce, speaking of the anthropogenic climate change
hypothesis
on ABC radio yesterday:

"I become sceptical when religious fervour builds up around an
issue"

Barnaby describes himself as a "born again" Christian. He's not
sceptical when hew should be and "sceptical" when there's no good
basis for it.

CORRECTION:
He's sceptical when he should be and not sceptical when there's no
good
basis for it.

So there's no good basis for being sceptical of christianity? It's all
sound and rational is it?
********************************************

There is far, far more basis for being skeptical of the rabid
socialist
whackos pushing the AGW scam.

Answer the question: Is there a basis for being sceptical of the
claims of Christianity. Is the religious fervour associated with
christainity a reasonable basis for acting?

Come on Bonzo: Is there a basis for being sceptical of the claims of
Christianity. Is the religious fervour associated with christainity a
reasonable basis for acting?

Repeating for slow learners ...


Ironic. Slow learners often repeat errors, and here you are again:


There is far, far more basis for being skeptical of the climate change scam!

This is not a response to the questions: Is there a basis for being
sceptical of the claims of Christianity. Is the religious fervour
associated with christainity a reasonable basis for acting?

How much relative basis there is is too vague a claim to shed any
light on the questions at all.

Is there some basis or no basis for scepticism about the claims of
Christianity. Is the religious fervour associated with christianity a
reasonable basis for acting?

One more try Bonzo. Can you answer?

Fran