| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
January 24th 09, 02:08 AM
posted to sci.environment,aus.politics,sci.skeptic,sci.geo.meteorology
|
|||
|
|||
ABC Caught Out Censoring Climate Change Skepticism
|
|
#2
January 24th 09, 02:26 AM
posted to sci.environment,aus.politics,sci.skeptic,sci.geo.meteorology
|
|||
|
|||
|
ABC Caught Out Censoring Climate Change Skepticism
"Bernd Felsche" wrote in message ... wrote: On Jan 24, 5:39=A0am, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: **Your ability to use English grammar is directly proportional to your knowledge of science. You can bring in all the strawman arguments you wish. I do not feel compelled to deal with them. Then shut the **** up Trevor. **Impressive grasp of science you have there, Mr MoronT. Tervvy, Temperatures during the Holocene Epoch where 1-2 degrees hotter than today. Pay no heed to Trevor. Trevor is a libelous, compulsive liar. **Mr Felsche, * You have claimed, recently, that volcanoes were responsible for the majority of CO2 in the atmosphere. Please supply your science to support this claim. * You have also claimed that 10^15 Tonnes of CO2 were placed into the atmosphere, during the 19th century, over a 10 year period. Please cite by what mechanism this alleged event occured. * Additionally, you have claimed that the same 10^15 tonnes of CO2 wer extracted from the atmosphere over a similar time period in the 19th century. Please cite the mechanism that caused this remarkable event. Seriously. Scientists have been instructed to find ways of moving large amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere. YOU, alone, seem to be the only person on the planet with this knowledge. Please enlighten us. I look forward to your answers. Unless, of course, you happen to be full of ****. I bet you have no answers to the above. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
|
#3
January 24th 09, 03:10 AM
posted to sci.environment,aus.politics,sci.skeptic,sci.geo.meteorology
|
|||
|
|||
|
ABC Caught Out Censoring Climate Change Skepticism
"Trevor Wilson" wrote:
"Bernd Felsche" wrote: wrote: On Jan 24, 5:39=A0am, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: **Your ability to use English grammar is directly proportional to your knowledge of science. You can bring in all the strawman arguments you wish. I do not feel compelled to deal with them. Then shut the **** up Trevor. **Impressive grasp of science you have there, Mr MoronT. Tervvy, Temperatures during the Holocene Epoch where 1-2 degrees hotter than today. Pay no heed to Trevor. Trevor is a libelous, compulsive liar. **Mr Felsche, * You have claimed, recently, that volcanoes were responsible for the majority of CO2 in the atmosphere. Please supply your science to support this claim. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. * You have also claimed that 10^15 Tonnes of CO2 were placed into the atmosphere, during the 19th century, over a 10 year period. Please cite by what mechanism this alleged event occured. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. * Additionally, you have claimed that the same 10^15 tonnes of CO2 wer extracted from the atmosphere over a similar time period in the 19th century. Please cite the mechanism that caused this remarkable event. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. Seriously. Scientists have been instructed to find ways of moving large amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere. YOU, alone, seem to be the only person on the planet with this knowledge. Please enlighten us. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. I look forward to your answers. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious requests. Unless, of course, you happen to be full of ****. I bet you have no answers to the above. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. -- /"\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia \ / ASCII ribbon campaign | Religion is regarded by the common people X against HTML mail | as true, by the wise as false, and by the / \ and postings | rulers as useful. -- Seneca the Younger |
|
#4
January 24th 09, 04:21 AM
posted to sci.environment,aus.politics,sci.skeptic,sci.geo.meteorology
|
|||
|
|||
|
ABC Caught Out Censoring Climate Change Skepticism
"Bernd Felsche" wrote in message ... "Trevor Wilson" wrote: "Bernd Felsche" wrote: wrote: On Jan 24, 5:39=A0am, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: **Your ability to use English grammar is directly proportional to your knowledge of science. You can bring in all the strawman arguments you wish. I do not feel compelled to deal with them. Then shut the **** up Trevor. **Impressive grasp of science you have there, Mr MoronT. Tervvy, Temperatures during the Holocene Epoch where 1-2 degrees hotter than today. Pay no heed to Trevor. Trevor is a libelous, compulsive liar. **Mr Felsche, * You have claimed, recently, that volcanoes were responsible for the majority of CO2 in the atmosphere. Please supply your science to support this claim. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. **Here are your words: "Nature produce the REAL vast majority of CO2 in the atmosphere." * You have also claimed that 10^15 Tonnes of CO2 were placed into the atmosphere, during the 19th century, over a 10 year period. Please cite by what mechanism this alleged event occured. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. **Of course not. Here are your words: "On the contrary. CO2 levels were MEASURED to have risen more quickly during the 19th century; about 100 ppm in the space of a decade, IIRC." And this: "A meta-analysis of those many thousands of measurements shows CO2 to be highly variable over the space of a decade or so; peaking at over 400 ppm in the middle of the 1800's." Have fun proving how this occured. We are all waiting. * Additionally, you have claimed that the same 10^15 tonnes of CO2 wer extracted from the atmosphere over a similar time period in the 19th century. Please cite the mechanism that caused this remarkable event. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. **There's this: "A meta-analysis of those many thousands of measurements shows CO2 to be highly variable over the space of a decade or so; peaking at over 400 ppm in the middle of the 1800's." You made it clear that there was a huge amount of CO2 in the atmosphere during the 19th century. It then magically vanished. 10^15 Tonnes of the stuff. Where did it go? Seriously. Scientists have been instructed to find ways of moving large amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere. YOU, alone, seem to be the only person on the planet with this knowledge. Please enlighten us. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. **Of course you don't. Rather than attempting to justify your nonsensical religious beliefs, you prefer to insult your opponent. SOP. You have nothing left. You're done. I look forward to your answers. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious requests. Unless, of course, you happen to be full of ****. I bet you have no answers to the above. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. **LOL! You're done, Mr Felsche. You would have been better keeping your head down. Your words have come back to haunt you. Time and time again. Had you approached this topic with some decorum, I would have felt less compelled to expose your more serious blunders. You blew it. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
|
#5
February 1st 09, 12:53 AM
posted to sci.environment,aus.politics,sci.skeptic,sci.geo.meteorology
|
|||
|
|||
|
ABC Caught Out Censoring Climate Change Skepticism
"Trevor Wilson" wrote:
"Bernd Felsche" wrote in message "Trevor Wilson" wrote: "Bernd Felsche" wrote: wrote: On Jan 24, 5:39=A0am, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: **Your ability to use English grammar is directly proportional to your knowledge of science. You can bring in all the strawman arguments you wish. I do not feel compelled to deal with them. Then shut the **** up Trevor. **Impressive grasp of science you have there, Mr MoronT. Tervvy, Temperatures during the Holocene Epoch where 1-2 degrees hotter than today. Pay no heed to Trevor. Trevor is a libelous, compulsive liar. **Mr Felsche, * You have claimed, recently, that volcanoes were responsible for the majority of CO2 in the atmosphere. Please supply your science to support this claim. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. **Here are your words: "Nature produce the REAL vast majority of CO2 in the atmosphere." q.e.d. * You have also claimed that 10^15 Tonnes of CO2 were placed into the atmosphere, during the 19th century, over a 10 year period. Please cite by what mechanism this alleged event occured. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. **Of course not. Here are your words: "On the contrary. CO2 levels were MEASURED to have risen more quickly during the 19th century; about 100 ppm in the space of a decade, IIRC." q.e.d. And this: "A meta-analysis of those many thousands of measurements shows CO2 to be highly variable over the space of a decade or so; peaking at over 400 ppm in the middle of the 1800's." q.e.d. Have fun proving how this occured. We are all waiting. You've just proven that you LIED. You stated that I had written things that I did not. And you did so deliberately. * Additionally, you have claimed that the same 10^15 tonnes of CO2 wer extracted from the atmosphere over a similar time period in the 19th century. Please cite the mechanism that caused this remarkable event. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. **There's this: "A meta-analysis of those many thousands of measurements shows CO2 to be highly variable over the space of a decade or so; peaking at over 400 ppm in the middle of the 1800's." Repeating yourself, dogmatically! You made it clear that there was a huge amount of CO2 in the atmosphere during the 19th century. It then magically vanished. 10^15 Tonnes of the stuff. Where did it go? Your dogma. It's not science. CO2 is NOT distributed uniformly over the planet, throughout the atmosphere or the oceans. You MADE UP a figure of 10^15 tonnes. Then attributed it to me. You lied. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. Seriously. Scientists have been instructed to find ways of moving large amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere. YOU, alone, seem to be the only person on the planet with this knowledge. Please enlighten us. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. **Of course you don't. Rather than attempting to justify your nonsensical religious beliefs, you prefer to insult your opponent. SOP. You have nothing left. You're done. My "religious" belief is in what we can measure, Your dogma is based on simulation. Simulation that even the high priests of global warming don't take seriously. I look forward to your answers. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious requests. Unless, of course, you happen to be full of ****. I bet you have no answers to the above. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. I feel no compulsion to answer the specious request. **LOL! You're done, Mr Felsche. You would have been better keeping your head down. Your words have come back to haunt you. Time and time again. Had you approached this topic with some decorum, I would have felt less compelled to expose your more serious blunders. You blew it. You are a libelous, compulsive liar. You have demonstrated this adequately, yet insist on repeating the experiment. -- /"\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia \ / ASCII ribbon campaign | Religion is regarded by the common people X against HTML mail | as true, by the wise as false, and by the / \ and postings | rulers as useful. -- Seneca the Younger |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ABC Caught Out Censoring Climate Change Skepticism | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| ABC Caught Out Censoring Climate Change Skepticism | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| ABC Caught Out Censoring Climate Change Skepticism | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| ABC Caught Out Censoring Climate Change Skepticism | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| ABC Caught Out Censoring Climate Change Skepticism | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
![Bernd Felsche[_2_] is offline](https://www.weather-banter.co.uk/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
